Jump to content

Theory of Geometric Unity: Difference between revisions

Theory of Geometric Unity (view source)

Revision as of 16:44, 27 September 2025

3,591 bytes added ,  27 September
→‎2025
Line 2,039: Line 2,039:




{{Tweet
|image=Reason_Will_Win-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Reason_Will_Win/status/1927743853475356836
|name=Zagros Ozkan
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Reason_Will_Win
|username=Reason_Will_Win
|content=That's why your observation about peer review really being peer injunction makes so much sense.
Sorry Eric, I feel you, and I'm sure many more do too. The spell will break through, I believe that.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=HeathHimself-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/HeathHimself/status/1926519377404285084
|name=Heath
|usernameurl=https://x.com/HeathHimself
|username=HeathHimself
|content=@EricRWeinstein Caught your debate with Sean Carroll on Piers. Why do you think he was spouting off so much misinformation about GU? "There's no Lagrangian!" I'm looking at the paper right now. There's literally 3 pages worth of Lagrangians like wtf.
|timestamp=6:03 AM · May 25, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 2,045: Line 2,064:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@HeathHimself Shhh. Have you noticed that you are like close to the only one who caught that? Explain that!
|content=Shhh. Have you noticed that you are like close to the only one who caught that? Explain that!


He just made that up. And no one noticed or bothered to check. And it is ALWAYS like this and has been for 40 years. I have no explanation. It’s completely beyond my comprehension.
He just made that up. And no one noticed or bothered to check. And it is ALWAYS like this and has been for 40 years. I have no explanation. It’s completely beyond my comprehension.
|timestamp=11:14 AM · May 28, 2025
|timestamp=11:14 AM · May 28, 2025
}}
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Reason_Will_Win-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Reason_Will_Win/status/1927743853475356836
|name=Zagros Ozkan
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Reason_Will_Win
|username=Reason_Will_Win
|content=Perhaps he was "instructing" the physics community:


 
"Act as though there are no Lagrangians"
|media1=Reason_Will_Win-X-post-1927743853475356836-GsCONH8XkAA0hfG.jpg
|timestamp=12:02 PM · May 28, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 2,071: Line 2,100:


It has been *exactly* like this for 40 years.  No one can believe it until they experience it. It has no explanation.
It has been *exactly* like this for 40 years.  No one can believe it until they experience it. It has no explanation.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1927742248894275596-GsC3W3NaoAEe59K.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-1927742248894275596-GsC3W3NbwAAUnRf.jpg
|timestamp=3:02 PM · May 28, 2025
|timestamp=3:02 PM · May 28, 2025
|media1=GsC3W3NaoAEe59K.jpg
}}
|media2=GsC3W3NbwAAUnRf.jpg
|timestamp=3:08 AM · May 28, 2025
}}
}}


Line 2,101: Line 2,132:




{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1928095740926251169
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ah. It has two features that general Ehressmanian geometry generally lacks:
I) A distinguished Choice of Connection (The Levi Civita connection and the connections induced from it on associated bundles).
II) Tensor Decomposition coming from the lack of structure groups auxiliary to those of the tangent bundles.
So actually the specific sub geometry of (pseudo)-Riemannian geometry is an exchange of Gauge Symmetry and field content freedom for these two attributes.
Except in totally exotic cases. Like the one in which we oddly happen to live…but I digress.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=HeathHimself-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/HeathHimself/status/1926519377404285084
|name=Heath
|usernameurl=https://x.com/HeathHimself
|username=HeathHimself
|content=@EricRWeinstein Caught your debate with Sean Carroll on Piers. Why do you think he was spouting off so much misinformation about GU? "There's no Lagrangian!" I'm looking at the paper right now. There's literally 3 pages worth of Lagrangians like wtf.
|timestamp=6:03 AM · May 25, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Neon__Genesis_-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Neon__Genesis_/status/1927831447164928207
|name=Neon
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Neon__Genesis_
|username=Neon__Genesis_
|content=The whole debate was very odd, Carroll didn't offer a single criticism of any substance, not a single concept or equation. We need to remember Sean at heart is a philosophy and astronomy major, not a mathematician or physicist despite their self-styling
|timestamp=8:56 PM · May 28, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 2,118: Line 2,183:


Sean’s work is the DIRECT competitor of this GU theory. And GU sacrificed neither.
Sean’s work is the DIRECT competitor of this GU theory. And GU sacrificed neither.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1928085868054729136-GsHv4ISaUAcvL0z.jpg
|timestamp=1:47 PM · May 29, 2025
|timestamp=1:47 PM · May 29, 2025
|media1=GsHv4ISaUAcvL0z.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=uniservent-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/uniservent/status/1928093271336665134
|name=UniServEnt
|usernameurl=https://x.com/uniservent
|username=uniservent
|content=Given info on this link, why do you need Riemannian  geometry in the first place if it is a subset of Ehressman?
 
https://chatgpt.com/share/68386b13-93e0-8013-a47d-75b2769f464d
|timestamp=2:17 PM · May 29, 2025
}}
|timestamp=2:27 PM · May 29, 2025
}}
}}


Line 2,157: Line 2,235:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=He was super encouraging about GU but saw symmetry totally differently from my more geometric perspective so there was always a translation issue. He always wanted everything translated into Hilbert space symmetries rather than manifold symmetries.  
|content=He was super encouraging about GU but saw symmetry totally differently from my more geometric perspective so there was always a translation issue. He always wanted everything translated into Hilbert space symmetries rather than manifold symmetries.  


One day he said something uncharacteristically “off” about the Large Exceptional Lie groups: F4 E6 E7 E8. It was uncomfortable because it was a sour note in the middle of an otherwise beautiful explanation. So I called attention to it.
One day he said something uncharacteristically “off” about the Large Exceptional Lie groups: F4 E6 E7 E8. It was uncomfortable because it was a sour note in the middle of an otherwise beautiful explanation. So I called attention to it.
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/22492"