Anthony Fauci
The virus appeared to learn a few tricks in Wuhan that really surprised me. We have been assured by Dr Fauci that this was in no way Gain of Function related.
Whatever happened in Wuhan *looks* like directed natural selection. I’m worried that this virus not quickly learn again.
@satoshishinosak Well, @BretWeinstein has been warning about lots of things about which he is simply and easily absolutely correct. Like the simple fact that vaccines change the adaptive landscape and will drive selection and viral adaptation.
Crazy seeing people arguing them to invalidate him.
@satoshishinosak @BretWeinstein As to the Ivermectin, spike protein as toxin, or danger from trials issues, I can’t say because I can’t evaluate that. But people are now trying to demonize everything we can say to avoid the conclusions he reaches on other issues.
But he’s CLEARLY right about many many things.
@satoshishinosak @BretWeinstein I have pushed him to separate his points and not to hybridize his views with others. He is usually at his best alone as a thinker. One man’s opinion.
@satoshishinosak @BretWeinstein That’s not against his guests on his podcast. It’s about the idea that many of Bret’s points are very subtle. The rigors of inviting someone you partially agree with but don’t know all that well make it important to be socially appropriate as host. And that leads to ambiguity.
I wanted to check my recollection. It is slightly off. Fauci says “very very strongly leaning toward this *could not* have been artificially or deliberately manipulated” Emphasis mine.
Not “was not”, but “could not”.
A crazy strong claim, but my memory is in error.
Apologies.
@AdamMcAdamson That was what I remembered. Crazily strong statement. But he did leave a tiny escape route. So I am in error. Even if a formal one.