UAP: Difference between revisions

From The Portal Wiki
Line 1,828: Line 1,828:
}}
}}
|timestamp=10:18 PM Ā· Oct 12, 2022
|timestamp=10:18 PM Ā· Oct 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584525548507652096
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@delbel156 I’m trying to keep this channel open.
The Portal is a communal resource. It reappears when you both need it and are prepared to fight for it. I cannot answer the interpersonal attacks myself as a public figure. Think about it a bit: It’s not haters.Ā  It’s a bit more serious.šŸ™
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584512558262026240
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’m happy to answer a few.
It’ll be fewer than I’d like. I was invited to participate in the press conference about to start, but that project is totally separate, so I politely declined the gracious offer of my hosts, as I came here as *unaffiliated* observer.
How may I help?
|timestamp=11:50 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584513260493344769
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you’re not interested in my responses, or feel I owe you total personal disclosure, I politely decline in advance and suggest you unfollow. Any abuse of good will ends in a block. Those are my rules so that I can say all I might to those genuinely interested. Fair? Let’s go!
|timestamp=11:52 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584514293990506497
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@DasWoolf I was not expecting to speak. The guest of honor, Lue Elizondo, became unavailable at the last minute. I was asked to step in. As a courtesy I agreed, and shared some ideas that represent no one but myself as a private US citizen working with publicly available info. Specifics?
|timestamp=11:57 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584515630987763713
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@andyinberlin I am not as sure as you are that this what is going on. It’s a matryoshka problem. I’m convinced that many people you think of as insiders are not really inside enough. The UAP/UFO community leaps to MANY conclusions as if this is fun. This is not fun if you are serious about it.
|timestamp=12:02 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584516670512504832
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ALean_Skye I don’t think people understand disclosure properly. Consider layers:
A) The basic *claimed* phenomena.</br>
B) Associate phenomena.</br>
C) Cover up of the above.</br>
D) People in the know living a lie.</br>
E) Outsiders being destroyed to keep secrets.</br>
F) Outsiders being forced to live lies.
|timestamp=12:06 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584517440205033472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ALean_Skye Disclosure likely has to do with F) as much as anything. No matter what A) Turns out to be. Which I still don’t really know. If you are fighting for disclosure, don’t over focus on whether we are prepared for A).
I’m not inflating my level of knowledge here. I still don’t know.
|timestamp=12:09 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584517907836329984
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@andyinberlin I see a lot of people struggling under a heavy weight. People take their NDAs very seriously.
|timestamp=12:11 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584518630129078272
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@dkb003 Official panels tend to be tightly controlled in advance through use of insiders. Occasionally that screws up and you get a Jeff Sachs (Lancet) or a Richard Feynman/Gen Kutyna (Challenger). Galileo Project is an outsider project. Prefer the latter.
|timestamp=12:14 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584519621931331584
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@DasWoolf Technology is the entry point *if* recovered craft are real. I’ve seen no such proof. None.
But it is *psychotic* not to have Particle Theorists, General Relativists and Differential Geometers all over our US effort. I have yet to meet one in two years. Makes me very suspicious.
|timestamp=12:18 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584520802656870401
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@DasWoolf One thought is that it is very hard to make up ghost stories about how Alcubierre Drives, Wormholes, Time Dilation, etc REALISTICALLY account for this with actual specialists.
I mean, I get it. But it’s nonsense. This is not about tech. It’s about post-GR/SM physics or a psyop.
|timestamp=12:22 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584521029879070721
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@DasWoolf It could sorta kinda maybe be a cover story for advanced tech. But I can’t get that to make sense yet. Maybe my failure of imagination.
|timestamp=12:23 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584522273477705728
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@delbel156 If others have gone beyond GR/SM to navigate/settle the cosmos, I don’t think they would let us leave this solar system with the BS we see in Russia/Ukraine, Wuhan etc. We look like a crazy species about to unlock the source code. It’s unbelievable. We look like savage fools.
|timestamp=12:28 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584522736096841728
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@delbel156 Just got warned. You want to know why I don’t tweet? Sorry all. Write to Twitter. I’m out. https://t.co/8aR5F0juYf
|timestamp=12:30 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
|media1=Ff1bBxEXEAE15qD.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584523483811172353
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@delbel156 This account is throttled beyond belief. Check the graph over time. Check the level of reputational attack. Check the DOJ ready to block Elon. Go review portal Episode 21. The level of narrative control is through the roof. Wake up. Look at the patterns. All FUD. All suppression. https://t.co/949t7DAPsS
|timestamp=12:33 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
|media1=Ff1btVrXwAAd4pI.jpg
}}
|timestamp=12:41 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584711870841520129
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben_koski Hope that helped clear things up. I was never meant to speak at this conference. Keep that in mind. Goodnight.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584685455077179392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Willing to answer a few more Tweets on the San Marino UAP conference where I unexpectedly was asked to fill in for @LueElizondo. I’m likely to get throttled &amp; harassed yet again. When and if the beloved Twitter nanny algorithm starts again, I’ll call it a night here in Rome.
Go! https://t.co/ZmhNnaRyIe
|timestamp=11:17 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
|media1=Ff3vBSbXEAEye24.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584686578357919744
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Same rules as before. No changes on my part. I’m doing this only because I am not trying to hide anything that I am in a reasonable position to share and many of you want to know what the heck is going on as much as I do. But there are limits. Such is life.
Shoot.
|timestamp=11:21 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584687193599401985
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@McLuhanStates @LueElizondo There is a lot of loose talk about dimensionality. Keep in mind that I have zero direct evidence of the phenomena. So this is wildly premature.
My interest here is that GU replaces one manifold with two in a bundle structure and adds BOTH temporal and spatial dimensions.
|timestamp=11:24 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584687932039798784
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@McLuhanStates @LueElizondo As the author of GU, I still don’t know how to think in multiple temporal dimensions. The math is quite exotic. But I at least know through GU that the math can FORCE us to confront ultra hyperbolic PDE. It would change everything we know if unscreened. No simple Hamiltonian.
|timestamp=11:26 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584688956171759622
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@McLuhanStates @LueElizondo I wish people would stop talking about higher dimensional beings though. If GU is on point, then we are also higher dimensional beings. So I could do without Exoticism. If this is in any way real, we should reserve speech for precise meanings. And I don’t know if it is real. Yet.
|timestamp=11:31 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584690081646153728
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@prowl4uap @LueElizondo Here goes. I still feel like this FEELS like bullshit. Particularly the number of explicit depictions of Tetrapod hominid like beings.
But the truckloads of indirect evidence suggests NHI. I just don’t have a way of squaring this. And the ā€œexperiencersā€ are breaking my heart.
|timestamp=11:35 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584690613970096129
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@prowl4uap @LueElizondo I wasn’t prepared for this part to be honest. I’ve met so many voices who’s lives were taken over by an experience that they seemingly didn’t want. People breaking down. As far from attention seeking as you can imagine with no theater background. It’s pretty hard to explain away.
|timestamp=11:37 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584691503862931456
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@prowl4uap @LueElizondo Why would ordinary folks ruin their lives like this? No money in it. No desire for fame. No other signs of shifted reality. So I don’t know what to say.
The absence of direct evidence screams BS. The indirect evidence screams some wildly new thing in town. And I’m too dumb here.
|timestamp=11:41 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584692115229270022
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@mikedduffey @LueElizondo Don’t know. Less if not asked to do something official. I hate this topic. It’s an infinite conundrum. Always a new hint. Never just some actual solid trustworthy data.
I’ve had quite enough space opera and national security runaround. Let’s get to the meal. Too many appetizers.
|timestamp=11:43 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584692504456491009
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@montanacasey @LueElizondo Don’t know who that is. I see the name around. But I’m not really in this space. It’s embarrassing. But I’m not a ufologist. And there is so much ufology that I’m not up on this stuff. My fault.
|timestamp=11:45 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584693072117788672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@smbodie3 @LueElizondo People were very kind. Apparently I did some wrong things on stage. But a condition of taking this on the night before was that I would be me. They decided this is real. I don’t have that data. I am still spread over real / not real until I see something super clear &amp; concrete.
|timestamp=11:47 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584693989126467584
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@twitpucker @LueElizondo I’d start with academic freedom and civility. There is more than enough here to DEMAND answers. This belongs to science as much as it does to NatSec. We don’t need a Fauci for UAP. We need physics and math to begin. Biology if warranted. Let’s just be serious if it is a threat.
|timestamp=11:51 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584694917762527233
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@twitpucker @LueElizondo The gigglers &amp; shamers &amp; accusers need to get a pacifier and a juice box for a time out. We gave out too many PhDs to mediocre souls. It’s a disaster. It’s nuts that they’re STILL here to inhibit consideration of this after all the claims by USG.
Too much inclusion of trolls.
|timestamp=11:54 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584695179218681856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@BostonsBuddha @twitpucker @LueElizondo It appears to be titrated. Which I dislike. At some point foreplay made sense. That was a while ago. Enough.
|timestamp=11:55 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584696317963403265
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@StevenBelmont4 @LueElizondo We’re now waiting for a cataclysmic event to arrive in a Poisson process. We aren’t getting it. Biden &amp; Putin &amp; Xi &amp; Kim &amp; Khamenei &amp; Zelensky are not getting where we are. It’s like they’re throwing a rave on a life boat surrounded by oceanic whitetips. Who are these people?
|timestamp=12:00 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584696981040947200
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@StevenBelmont4 @LueElizondo We have all our eggs in this basket and we are focused on Eastern Ukraine &amp; Chips in Taiwan like the world didn’t change last century forever? I’m totally lost. I don’t want to be here for the Poisson process. I want to be somewhere with an atmosphere and real distance from this.
|timestamp=12:02 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584697476241510401
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@RGoddardishere @LueElizondo Would prefer not to. I need data and an end to NatSec paternalism. This is either serious or it isn’t. If it isn’t, stop wasting time. If it is, you need the physicists and geometers at a minimum. Where are they??
|timestamp=12:04 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584698467951464449
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@codingfodder @LueElizondo Read @notevenwrong’s excerpts of the David E Kaplan interview. We need to clean house to revitalize physics as if our lives depend on its progress. Anyone who wants to whine about taxpayer dollars for theoretical physics gets thrown out of the planning discussion. So destructive.
|timestamp=12:08 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584699302479204352
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@UAPDAO @LueElizondo Yes…but it’s like space opera. Lots of claims. I’d like to see something. Isn’t it a bit weird to hear these super detailed stories with hard NO EVIDENCE this even happened?
It’s embarrassing frankly. Like Stag-o-Lee stories around a campfire. Only from serious people.
|timestamp=12:12 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584699557858115584
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@galacticfuton Been going on for too long. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø
|timestamp=12:13 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584700173498077186
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@207isHeaven I’m not read in anywhere. Not an insider unless I have to become one.
|timestamp=12:15 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584701148396916737
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@SergheiIancenco @McLuhanStates @LueElizondo There’s an operation called ā€œPull Backā€ in differential topology. It’s akin to pulling back data from a record album. You don’t hear the album all at once even though the data is all there at once. We’d be pullbacks into 4D from 14D w/ both 4D &amp; 14D existence. Bit of a mind flip.
|timestamp=12:19 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584701772332863488
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@nickthadude_86 @LueElizondo Many. Of either Material vehicles or spoofing and disinformation. It feels like a spoof that is too big for anyone or any group to pull off. Like way too big. So I think it’s probably real. Just can’t believe it has no solid evidence. I don’t get how this is possible.
|timestamp=12:21 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584702496517533699
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@TheCertainT @Klupperz Let me answer this. I don’t think we are alone in the universe. So a lot rests on GR being effectively a moat making travel so cumbersome as to be not worth attempting. If that’s wrong; it’s pretty arrogant to think we are alone in the solar system. Post-GR changes a lot of odds.
|timestamp=12:24 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584703074048028673
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@TheCertainT @Klupperz I promise you India would keep the North Sentinelese from leaving and causing trouble if the Islanders figured out Science and Fusion Wepons before they figured out how to escape and build vehicles to escape their island. Think about it.
|timestamp=12:27 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584703429313966080
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@lololmaoha @LueElizondo Magic spoon has weird mouth feel. But it’s okay.
|timestamp=12:28 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584704312470474752
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@Intriguing_Post @LueElizondo Tetrapods are the least interesting beings. Because then it’s likely just earth life or we were seeded from them. Tells us little about Post-GR escape. Post-GR is everything to me. Can we travel the cosmos? Dunno.
ā€œOur home is in the stars or not at all.ā€
I believe that.
|timestamp=12:32 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584706388785524736
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@207isHeaven No.
|timestamp=12:40 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584706827098664960
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@kerskine They are running out of road. So it is way up. People are fed up.
|timestamp=12:42 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584707061828694016
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@YungJozuz Yes.
|timestamp=12:43 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584707144435519488
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben83724 Can’t answer.
|timestamp=12:43 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584707494857043970
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@DannyDeck68 There was a lot of disinformation around the Golden Age of GR. It’s mostly in the public domain. But it requires piecing together.
|timestamp=12:44 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584708395851882496
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben_koski Last Question of the Night: where did the top mathematicians and physicists go after the Mansfield amendment(s)? How can you have UAP where I am the only voice loudly pointing out that Real Alien Vehicles would like require new physical law. We can account for every relevant PhD.
|timestamp=12:48 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584709482550276096
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben_koski Where are the physicists and Geometers? Hint hint.
If they are not out here, it’s likely all BS. If they are here, they are hidden in plain sight. There just aren’t that many of us. Technology won’t work if you don’t know the relevant science. That’s not engineering or MatSci.
|timestamp=12:52 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584710235285229568
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben_koski Stop dreaming about FTL. Or element 115. Or Alcubierre GR. Or electogravitics. It’s bizarre that we discuss this so much.
First Ask: where are our relevant experts? Imagine you want the top 25 GR/SM/DiffGeometers for a matter of national security? Put together that list.
|timestamp=12:55 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584710958823665664
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben_koski If those folks aren’t out here then we are talking about a psyop or a giant government blunder endangering us all. If they ARE here, you know their names. Work backwards. Is there an NSA for UAP? If so what is its address? Come on guys. Not many speak this language. Small club.
|timestamp=12:58 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584711694034833409
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@ben_koski What happened with the Mansfield amendment &amp; why does no one discuss this? We used to have our top people on this but we called it something else. Where did it go? Either it ended or it didn’t. It’s a tiny world. Just don’t get all Qanon. It’s a big story: Treat it w/ respect.šŸ™
|timestamp=1:01 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
|timestamp=1:02 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586314916809449472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@nickpopemod I say exactly the same. But, to be fair, the skeptics can point to zero incontrovertible evidence (at least so far as I am aware)…Which is a big deal in my book. The soft evidence is not in their favor. The absence of hard evidence *available to citizens &amp; scientists* is. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586165471233003520
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let me say two things.
A) I have always believed that almost all Unidentified Flying Objects are just that: something unremarkable that is not identified.
B) That has nothing to do with the issue of the remainder. It takes no more than a *single* confirmed inexplicable event.
|timestamp=1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586165474198376450
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Beyond that, as I have told you, I am sure that I am being used by at least some of those who have come to talk to me. But I cannot come up with any explanation for some of the representations made to me. And I get more fed up by the day with USG playing ā€œLucy &amp; the footballā€.
|timestamp=1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586165477553803264
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=National Security isn’t license to gaslight &amp; ruin the lives of ordinary folks who aren’t participating in IC games. It’s cruel, abusive &amp; totally UnAmerican. Come up with better cover if you need it. But between bioweapons/UAP gaslighting, you’re playing god. And you’re not him.
|timestamp=1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586165480670171136
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Shabbat Shalom everyone. Have a great weekend.
|timestamp=1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586305195897544736
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@Methedra And often forced to speak as if one voice. Don’t forget that part.
|timestamp=10:33 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586306033349033984
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@CarpathianMts Happy to NEVER mention UFO/UAP ever again and work quietly. Totally up to what the interested community wants. I hate this topic. I just think it is clear that it appears to be criticallyĀ  important. Even if it is a USG headfake.
|timestamp=10:36 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
|timestamp=11:12 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587174715864408065
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@UAP_LEE @dsmethurst66 Yeah. That must be it. ;-)
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587093226254499841
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This is an odd moment. Official Washington tells us we have lost control of airspace. But also we should not in any way freak out because it is mostly just a combination of Hypersonic enemy drones of rival powers and some ultra high performing seagulls. And some alien non-aliens.
|timestamp=2:44 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587093228200656896
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Which is to say…we clearly have two factions in government not allowed to file separate reports. The result is total intellectual incoherence.
So the whole thing comes across like the USG is having its first collective magic mushroom trip in real time. It’s so embarrassing.
|timestamp=2:44 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587093229580607494
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Good luck on this report. If I had to guess it will again be super interesting if unpacked and as boring as possible on the surface. But I have little confidence in my own guess.
I am going to drop my interest way back if things stay like this too much longer. But let’s see. šŸ™
|timestamp=2:44 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587099011533574144
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@528vibes Let’s put it this way. I will lose interest in government disclosure as a self protective measure. This is an abusive relationship. Whose government is it? Ours? Theirs? Lockheed’s? Enough.
I’m playing by the rules. They aren’t.
|timestamp=3:07 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587101954521452546
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@seanonolennon Done.
|timestamp=3:19 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587114557683552256
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@IdesignsWak Deliberate misinterpretation to smear never gets old.
|timestamp=4:09 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587125487423614976
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@seanonolennon Let’s get out of here.
Miss you too. And happy belated if I didn’t call. I think I did or sent a voice message. But the days run together honestly.
|timestamp=4:52 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587173436778250240
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Ya know, it kinda did Mick. It speaks with many voices. And some of those heads said stuff.
I really don’t get why we are often apart. We agree there is no incontrovertible concrete data in the public domain. And I never mention those grainy videos because they don’t impress me.
|timestamp=8:03 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1587174226108174339
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Anytime you can clear up a bird or a weather ballon, or flares or a jet with a funny reflection, I am thrilled.
I’m really grateful for that part of what you have contributed. So thank you.
But the other part, leaves me feeling like I just don’t get something.
Take care.
|timestamp=8:06 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
|timestamp=8:08 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590777418075496448
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This isn’t 18th century France. Just a thought.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739362454843396
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=One of the questions about UFOs that needs to be asked, and that I don’t hear much about, is: ā€œHas the US government built fake UFOs?ā€
UFO people are so focused on whether there are real UFOs that they don’t push hard enough on this question.
Allow me to share a thought or two. https://t.co/B1FXSmb9Z3
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
|media1=FhNxBNvVUAMH8ns.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739368503046145
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=When I first realized I was totally wrong about UFO/UAP, I was shocked by how many folks have very similar stories about recovered crashes of very similar advanced vehicles.
It was mind blowing in 2 ways.
A) We have real crashed vehicles.
And/Or
B) We built fake alien vehicles. https://t.co/4sOOXDtPoW
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
|media1=FhNxBicVUAA69V9.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739374559617025
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=At this point I’m reasonably sure there are things that look like cool alien vehicle in some hangers. But I also grew up near Hollywood and remember super cool looking fake space cars visible off the Hollywood freeway.
So: does anyone have stories of building fake UFOs for USG? https://t.co/3JuMmOwFRZ
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
|media1=FhNxB4iVUAg6Ff_.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739382201307140
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As you likely guessed, all the photos in this thread are fake military equipment. The airbase is totally fake. The dummy tanks are often inflated on the battlefield. The fake tank pieces are bolted on to real cars.
Q: Did we build fake UFOs in places like Wright-Patterson AFB? https://t.co/VRD9vroHdm
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
|media1=FhNxCXaVUAA7vrd.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739384583979008
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=After studying this issue for 2yrs, I’m pretty convinced that there ARE wild looking vehicles in secret high security locations. But I also find NO SIGN OF OUR TOP PHYSICISTS. That is a huge red flag. If you had fake UFOs, you would have a puzzle for physics: What is the science?
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739386131689472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A true recovered interstellar craft would be like LHC or LIGO data: potential scientific data for physics beyond the Standard Model and General Relativity.
But if the crafts are fake, you would be crazy to let the A-team physicists near them. It would blow up in your face.
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739390351159297
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So my ignorant question is this: are there stories of building fake UFOs for sites in Nevada? Ohio? Are there fake retrieval teams? To what extent does faking military equipment spill into faking a UFOgasm for decades?
Because there are too many very similar craft stories. https://t.co/CfXOh0yXdW
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
|media1=FhNxC3_VUAEUmwE.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739392733536256
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So, at this point, the stories of craft kept at secret locations is most likely to be true in my opinion.Ā  But it is also true that all the top physics talent that was working only semi-covertly on suspicious gravity projects left by the early 1970s. So any craft may be faked.
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739394285428737
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Either way, it’s a big deal. Everything changed in the early 70s. It’s impossible to say how much. The moment the Mansfield amendment came in, physics began to stagnate. And ā€œQuantum Gravityā€ destroyed our culture of science. We don’t even whisper about its ā€œAnti-Gravityā€ origin.
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590739396055412736
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So to sum up: there do *appear* to be craft. But advanced armies all build dummy weapons.
Q1: Do we have any Fakes?
Q2: Do we have only Fakes?
Q3: Why do we talk almostĀ  *exclusively* about Technology and not new Post-GR/SM science if there are *any* real interstellar craft?
šŸ™
|timestamp=4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590755212503183363
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Note Added: many readers are making wild inferences about me talking aboutĀ  flying fakes. I was very clear that this was about apparent crafts on the ground and in Hangars in Nevada, Ohio &amp; elsewhere.
Wild or bad inference patterns will get you blocked. I don’t have time. Thx.
|timestamp=5:16 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1590777415827337216
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Uh. I’m kind of coming to the end of my patience w/ this line of thinking.
PhD Scientists aren’t the ā€˜help.’ We are the backbone. And, honestly, I would never treat ANY service people this way! The security risks of embittering scientists by treating them like servants is nuts.
|timestamp=6:44 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
|timestamp=6:44 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1591473825690288128
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@Deepneuron @SBF_FTX I can’t explain curvature tensor to 5 year olds. I admit I don’t even understand the rule of ā€œif you can’t explain it simply you don’t understand it.ā€ It seems totally wrong to me! Oh well.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1591468740767612931
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I don’t think there is any history of my ever commenting on @SBF_FTX.
It is because I never deeply understood what was going on when it was explained to me. I’m not going to lie: I felt dumb.
[[Morals|Moral]]: be very careful celebrating success that you don’t understand for its own sake.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=SBF_FTX-profile-AKRRTAI-.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/SBF_FTX/status/1591089320290816000
|name=SBF
|usernameurl=https://x.com/SBF_FTX
|username=SBF_FTX
|content=2) I'm really sorry, again, that we ended up here.
Hopefully things can find a way to recover.Ā  Hopefully this can bring some amount of transparency, trust, and governance to them.
Ultimately hopefully it can be better for customers.
|timestamp=4:31 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=4:31 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1591472636454133760
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Other things that made/make me feel dumb:
Bernie Madoff’s Returns</br>
COVID origin questions = Racism</br>
Fauci</br>
Hilary’s Inevitability</br>
[[Quantum Gravity]]</br>
[[Jeffrey Epstein|Jeffrey Epstein’s CCY trading Claims]]</br>
[[CPI|CPI Construction]]</br>
[[UAP|UFO/UAP]]</br>
Chinese Graduate Students in STEM</br>
Open Borders</br>
Defund The Police</br>
DEI</br>
NIH
|timestamp=4:46 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=4:51 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1594057250833768449
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@TOEwithCurt I think that there is a lot more deliberate mis/disinformation right now and a modest increase in the level of information. So far as I can make out, they seem related. It’s as if as soon as more needles appear, haystacks arrive that make them hard to find.
I’m pretty annoyed.
|timestamp=7:57 PM Ā· Nov 19, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1594058579916431360
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@TOEwithCurt As to intuition….we don’t and shouldn’t have much.
Hard UFO/UAP data is supposed to be all about the unprecedented. Disinformation and superstition is all well precedented. So intuition should say it’s all BS. The whole thing comes down to hard data.
Intuition here is useless.
|timestamp=8:02 PM Ā· Nov 19, 2022
}}
}}



Revision as of 03:51, 18 January 2026

MW-Icon-Warning.png This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.

On X

2021

As I said before, I have no idea what to make of the UAP shift of our government. But I do know that this period is unlike *any* other epoch. And there are many *different* unprecedented things that could happen so close to the source code as we have been for 50 to 75 years.

4:30 PM Ā· Apr 16, 2021


The number of higher credibility officials or former officials choosing to walk right up to, yet generally not over, the line of confirming alien encounters via UAP has changed markedly.

I have always avoided UFO discussion. This makes that impossible:

https://t.co/uaM0wwEVMu

4:09 PM Ā· Apr 21, 2021


At this point, the story I am tracking isn’t ā€œLittle Green Menā€. It is ā€œOfficials inexplicably change course on UFO narrativeā€.

Also, the story about ā€œTechnology never before seen.ā€ Would make more sense with ā€œTechnologyā€ replaced by ā€œPhysicsā€.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

High level government officials have given UAPs credibility, but it's still pretty hard for an outsider to analyze the evidence objectively. It's all video footage and testimony. We need much stronger evidence to form any real opinion on UFOs being extraterrestrial or not.

12:06 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

The US/Europe seriously diverted attention from doing real theoretical physics almost 40 years ago in 1984 to explore physics inspired mathematics. Did China/Iran/Russia/Israel? I don’t know.

But I can tell you this: no one in government is appropriately focused on new physics.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

Imagine in 1900 some ā€œcrankā€ told you about thermonuclear weapons. Would you listen or laugh? Well, they’d be only 5 decades away with no aliens necessary. And powered flight hadn’t happened yet!

That’s how powerful a ā€œnew physicsā€ advantage is. We’re behaving like lunatics.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

Any time ANYONE at least 1/2-way viable says something weird or kooky or interesting (Wolfram, Lisi, etc.) the cost of a Department of Energy 1hr phone call is negligible. Almost no one with that background says anything like this. Maybe less than 1 such PhD ā€œlunaticā€ per year.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

Do I think Wolfram, Lisi, Kaku, Smolin, Klee Irwin, Sarfatti, Woit/Penrose etc are right or on the doorstep of new physics? No! But It’s also totally irrelevant to the security risk.

It wouldn’t matter to me at all. I would check in with all of them: the cost is zero. The risk?

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

The thing I like least about Geometric Unity is not being able to know what it would unlock if true, any more than Einstein and Bohr understood Lise Meitner, Stan Ulam & Edward Teller’s weaponization of New Physics.

We are talking about UFOs while not worrying about New Physics.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

Think about the g-2 muon anomaly. Have you heard as much about that suggesting the possibility of New Physics from high precision (rather than high energy) as you have about the TicTac UAP?

Similarly, how often do you hear about UAP technology rather than physics issues. Right??

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

I have no idea what to make of the change in the UAP narrative. What I can tell you with certainty is that for such an ENORMOUS change in the narrative there is no sane explanation for the DOE not to be talking new physics risks and taking every one of the few claims seriously.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

As we saw over & over in the 20th century, any small change in physics can change everything almost overnight. From A-Bombs to Semiconductors.

The handful of PhD level claims are of negligible cost to investigate & dismiss compared to a single fighter jet.

DOE lost the plot.

1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021

Enough! Let’s get back to UFOs and space opera so we don’t have to worry about China & Iran making a breakthrough on a white board in some lab we can’t see.

Moral: if you take UFOs seriously but not the risk of new physics, you aren’t thinking clearly.

Just think about it. šŸ™

ERW-X-post-1385231788667113474-EzlU-H5VUAcjajt.jpg
1:59 PM Ā· Apr 22, 2021


We are being told L*ttl*-Gr**n-M*n and are being handed the vowels i and four e’s by our defense department.

Only don’t say UFO...say UAP. And when we ask ā€œSo...aliens?ā€ They say ā€œThis is not consistent with the capabilities of any nation.ā€

Cut the crap: https://t.co/cfDIUVvndC

4:37 PM Ā· May 16, 2021

No one knows how to talk about this. It isn’t our top headline.

My question is *how* is this not our top headline? Either the defense department is pranking the entire world or we have the largest dire security mystery on earth or we have contact.

All 3 would be our top story.

4:37 PM Ā· May 16, 2021


When our experts now talk openly about all these UFOs they talk about their ā€œtechnologyā€.

And every time they do, I replace the word ā€œtechnologyā€ with the word ā€œphysicsā€ for the obvious reasons. Because if non-terrestrial craft are here, physics > technology.

5:26 PM Ā· May 16, 2021

Imagine if these UAP were actually visitors from beyond the local solar neighborhood. You wouldn’t be focused on their technology first. You’d want to understand how they got here and if they used new physics to do so. Most importantly, you’d want to know about dimension hacking.

5:26 PM Ā· May 16, 2021

A key issue in Geometric Unity for me is whether additional temporal & spatial degrees of freedom are accessible or shielded from manipulation. But consider what 6 additional temporal dimensions or the ability to manipulate rulers and protractors fundamentally could yield.

5:26 PM Ā· May 16, 2021

We are somehow no longer worried about any new physics. We are so sure it won’t suddenly progress in an unexpected way or unlock anything new that we aren’t even paying attention to the field. After String Theory it all feels ironic.

This is potentially a *catastrophic* mistake.

5:26 PM Ā· May 16, 2021

Every threat against a head of state is taken seriously. Even the absurd ones. It is cheaper to dot a few ā€œiā€s and cross a few ā€œtā€s than to not worry about such threats.

Obviously.

UAP, Gain Of Function, New Physics, MANPADS, loose nukes, etc should be the same.

Obviously.

5:26 PM Ā· May 16, 2021


You can recover a surprising amount from just one simple statement: UAP, public health, standardized testing, immigration, mortgage backed securities, crypto, inflation methodology, String Theory, Aaron Swartz, Etc.

ā€œInstitutions do not have the right to gaslight individuals.ā€

6:40 PM Ā· May 18, 2021

In a certain sense, that is the main through-line of my politics. Any institution that gaslights an ordinary human trying to make sense of the world in a reasonable fashion is wrong to me in a particularly profound way.

Don’t know how to describe this as a political perspective.

6:40 PM Ā· May 18, 2021


Folk wisdom to the contrary, we are somehow mildly pregnant with UFOs.

1:29 AM Ā· May 29, 2021

It’s very weird. It’s ongoing titration of UFO declassifications so that we never wake up to hear ā€œIt’s little green men!ā€ nor ā€œWe figured out they were just seagulls covered in metallic flotsam.ā€

We just get pulled farther and farther out. Like a rip-tide you don’t even notice.

1:34 AM Ā· May 29, 2021

I’m not saying that the UAP/UFO stuff is šŸ‘½. I am saying that we’re being *told* it’s šŸ‘½ in a game.

The game: we present a mystery (UFOs) and then take away all but one option. If you guess *anything* but šŸ‘½, we tell you it is de facto been ruled out.

Guess šŸ‘½, and we shrug šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø.

1:44 AM Ā· May 29, 2021


Our National and military position on UAP/UFO in restricted military airspace makes no sense to me.

As in zero. Maybe I just don’t get it but I really really don’t get it. Can anyone make this make sense? Why is the leadership of the US scientific community totally absent?

7:36 PM Ā· May 31, 2021

The US isn’t explaining or keeping secrets. We aren’t debunking. We aren’t defending ourselves. We aren’t interested as a nation or even particularly curious. We aren’t outraged. We do giggle a bit. We aren’t debating. We aren’t excited.

We are sleepwalking. As usual. Even here.

7:36 PM Ā· May 31, 2021


UFO / UAP Poll:

2:55 AM Ā· Jun 6, 2021

Note: if you think this is Atlantis or future humans or Orca technology, choose ā€œalienā€ to this earth. There just weren’t enough characters allowed. Sorry.

3:06 AM Ā· Jun 6, 2021


On UFO/UAP: note the absence of top physicists. Or scientists more generally. Or academicians more generally than that.

Any science fiction author would know to get our leading physicists, geometers, evolutionary biologists, linguists on this if it’s real. Ok, so where are they?

7:01 PM Ā· Jun 7, 2021

There has been a tiny response. Mostly we see military, ex-military and civilians UFO community commenting.

The number of top relevant academicians commenting is near zero. This is very odd because we know from the Manhattan project that you need to tap your academics. Thoughts?

7:04 PM Ā· Jun 7, 2021


The UAP data is all of ours. Not the military’s exclusively.

It is scientific data. It is physics data.

We need to get it to our physicists. Not just our aerospace companies & defense contractors.

The Institute for advanced study, fully informed, should be leading discussion.

6:16 PM Ā· Jun 8, 2021

@the_IAS > @LockheedMartin

This is ridiculous.

6:16 PM Ā· Jun 8, 2021


Not releasing claimed (remarkable) data and expecting scientists comment is a recipe for destroying scientific credibility.

The Military destroyed lives of those who claimed to have seen what leaked.

I demand our data from the defense department. Demand yours as well.

  1. UAP #UFO
7:26 PM Ā· Jun 8, 2021


25000 of you answered. Almost 3 in 4 of you believe either that UFOs are a deliberate fabrication of the government and/or Next Generation US Tech, or from some previously unknown advanced civilization.

About 1 in 4 say the US is just incompetent (in error or being leapfrogged).

2:47 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021

UFO / UAP Poll:

ERW-X-poll-1401372265564889091.jpg
2:55 AM Ā· Jun 6, 2021

The poll ran for 3 days to decrease selection bias. It was stable from early on in the response patterns.

Over 2/5 of you have already gone to some form of alien explanation.

Even at this crude level I find this fascinating having run several of these Twitter polls in the past.

2:47 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021

The poll was intended to force people to make a definite guess:

There is nothing real there (lying or incompetence)

There is something there (US tech)

There is something there (Adversaries).

There is something there (Aliens)

More characters would have helped, but not much.

2:47 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021

But here is what I find fascinating: if 2/5 of us think this is Aliens, and 3/4 of us think the US is *baldly* lying on a matter of grave security, in possession of out of this world tech, or are being visited by advanced alien civilizations…and UAP is still not the top story.

2:47 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021

I personally have no idea what’s going on. If I believe in my country then it is most likely aliens. If I disbelieve my country we are engaged in a lie that will soon collapse and destroy our trust and credibility even more.

Moral: get us US scientists our own US UAP data. Now.

2:47 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021


My 1st tweet thread ever about UFO/UAP so far as I know was end of April of 2020.

So I am WAY late to this party.

Why? Because I thought this was all bullshit. I shutdown most every conversation until last year on this.

Why? Because it seemed obviously preposterous. I trusted.

11:02 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021

I never went through an X-files phase. No ā€œChariots of The Godsā€ or ā€œAncient Aliensā€ phase. Ever.

I can’t even conceive of a world where this national strategy makes any sense.

The US can be occasionally ruthless. But just plain dumb? I still can’t believe we are Keystone Cops.

11:02 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2021


John reached out to me not all that long ago. I also will not kill myself. I’m not suicidal.

Also, this is getting fucking ridiculous.

This authoritarian turn around Epstein, Wuhan, Ivermectin, ā€œFortifying Democracyā€, UAP, climate, mostly peaceful protests, Leaked Tax Returns…

10:27 PM Ā· Jun 23, 2021

Getting subtle messages from U.S. officials saying, in effect: "We're coming for you McAfee! We're going to kill yourself". I got a tattoo today just in case. If I suicide myself, I didn't. I was whackd. Check my right arm.

$WHACKD available only on http://McAfeedex.com:)

Officialmcafee-X-post-1200864283766251521-EKpTsSGW4AU2 Ke.jpg
7:48 PM Ā· Nov 30, 2019

…mandatory racism exorcism at work, #metoo witch hunts, shadowbanning, Build Back Better, Trust and Safety, TOS changes, compulsory speech, ANTIFA denials, Labor Shortage claims, denial etc…etc… is clearly a repudiation of all the US stands for. He was bugged by it all.

10:27 PM Ā· Jun 23, 2021

And if you mention the ENORMOUS number of issues that are behaving in this *same* totally artificial fashion, the reputation attacks SOAR from all sides.

What the hell has control of the US and why is it localized to the Democratic Party & it’s associated media and businesses?

10:27 PM Ā· Jun 23, 2021

I wish I could remember his call w/ more precision. But it was when I was in San Francisco. I couldn’t believe I was known to him.

NOTE: I will be taking a new approach to all repetitive doxing, reputational or other attacks as a result.

Think I’m done fucking around.

10:27 PM Ā· Jun 23, 2021

Having been menaced over asking for Epstein as a fake ā€œDisgraced Financierā€ to be called out by our press and connected to any intelligence services, this takes on new meaning.

When you can’t call your own damn teams for help, who can you even call?

I so hate this shit. RIP JM.

10:27 PM Ā· Jun 23, 2021


DOD: It appears not to be that we can't confirm that it's no longer the case that with multiple sensor data that it is now unlikely that at least some UAP are likely to be non-human technology or enemies leapfrogged us.

Public: Huh. Gosh. Ok. Meh.

DOD: Phew. Dodged that bullet.

4:20 PM Ā· Jun 26, 2021


It’s totally irresponsible for any scientist to refuse to investigate UAP after this report with a full and unpruned decision tree at her side.

That includes considering the total incompetence of the defense department, *aliens*, spoofing by enemies and UFO political economy.

6:37 PM Ā· Jun 26, 2021

Name a single species on earth so insignificant that biologists do not bother to include it on the phylogenetic tree or consider it interesting?

Neil:Pardon me for asking, but isn’t *this* an egocentric anti-curiosity position elevating radical obligate ā€œdebunkingā€ over science?

1:14 AM Ā· Jun 28, 2021

How egocentric of us to think that Space Aliens, who have mastered interstellar travel across the Galaxy, would give a shit about humans on Earth.

Neiltyson-X-post-1409308565127450631-E47aRRlWEAEVQ4H.png
12:32 AM Ā· Jun 28, 2021

This isn’t meant as a dig. I am trying to use your same exactly choice of normative framing that you used to dismiss my fellow inquiring minds in the wake of the UAP report. Happy to remove it if we can get rid of the invective. Thanks.

1:19 AM Ā· Jun 28, 2021

*exact

1:23 AM Ā· Jun 28, 2021


I subscribe to an unpopular position. Consider 3 kinds of šŸŒŽ:

A) Ones with no life or at least no life within striking distance of the source code (ToE).

B) Worlds that are on the verge of gaining the source code but are confined to a terrestrial surface.

C) Root level access.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

Now, if you can jack into the cosmos as ā€˜Root’ it MAY facilitate stuff that’s unimaginable (e.g. dimension hacking) yet only one remaining big upgrade away from being able to fuse nuclei. Which is where we are now.

I’d guess all civilizations that are Root care about each other.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

The following is pure speculation (Tutored by experience w/ GU):

I think we sent a signal to the cosmos in 1945 and then on Nov. 1, 1952. Fusing Nuclei is what you do JUST before you become root. If this is right, we let the cosmos know ā€œEarth is root adjacentā€ w/o awareness.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

Is there anyone in the cosmos listening? Perhaps not. But we are all acting as if living on a terrestrial surface with the ability to fuse nuclei is some totally normal thing due to <70 years of good luck. Which is insane.

Now what if I’m right in the above and the cosmos cares?

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

The idea of a newly space-time-faring unwise civilization with fresh root level access is a nightmare. And no one but no one on earth takes this seriously anymore. After 1952 fundamental physics went on progressing normally for ~20yrs. So after that it’s been~50yrs of stagnation.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

In those ~50yrs we learned to stop worrying. About Fusion-weapons, interstellar travel, a cosmos that listens or even our ability to progress to the end. In 1984, physicists were talking about the end of physics without irony. They then failed, while failing to report failure.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

So they told another story: ā€œString theory didn’t fail!! It may take 100s of years to figure it out!ā€ That is ā€œIf we String Theorists can’t make progress, a Theory of Everything is now far over the Horizon for everyone else.ā€ But that’s not logically necessary. I say we’re close.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

It makes sense to worry about *every* small boutique program: Lisi, Wolfram, Barbour, LQG, Tegmark, ConnesLott, Octonions, amplitudhedron, etc. Our science/defense establishment doesn’t seem to get this idea: after 50yrs of no progress it seems too abstract to practical men.

2:15 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

I learned from my buddy @SamHarrisOrg that he thought šŸ‘½ would be Millenia ahead of us. Look at Nov 1, 1952 from Nov 1 1902: you don’t have powered flight, know what relativity or the quantum is, know that neutrons exist, know about anti-matter, etc.

From ā€˜02, ā€˜52 IS millennia. https://t.co/YiRc1AbkcU

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

Well, we may or may not have a major update in our future. And if it unlocks dimension hacking, looking glass matter, VEV/potential hacking, multi-temporal pseudo-Riemannian metrics, Dark Chemisty, Dark Light, additional families, RaritaSchwinger fields, etc then we get upgraded.

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

And I believe all at once.

What does that mean? I honestly don’t know.

But Imagine you sent a chainsaw, a Bugatti, Ibogaine, ā€œMy-1st-Crisperā€, and an F-18 to a badly behaved 5yr old child for a birthday present w a simple card: ā€œEnjoy!ā€ We’d worry specifically b/c immaturity.

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

That’s what NDT has most wrong. He thinks we are far behind anything that could visit us, but that ISN’T backed up by science. He’d have to explain why we aren’t ā€œroot adjacentā€ right now or that root buys us nothing. Well?

Think of the relationship of Iran to nukes for example.

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

Iran is now Nuke adjacent. And their facilities and scientists keep running into mysterious problems. Why? Surely not because Iran is too insignificant to her more advanced neighbors. That would mirror NDT’s argument. My argument is that root level access to nuclei *suffices*.

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

Am I saying ā€œAliens are hereā€? Of course not. But the ā€œRoot Adjacency Hypothesisā€ is not properly discussed almost anywhere. Which defies all explanation.

Perhaps everyone else is right & I’m wrong. Absolutely! But it’s common for the world to make a crazy dumb idea a consensus.

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

And I think NDT is enforcing a dangerous ā€œCopernicanā€ consensus that we are too insignificant to even monitor or visit, to go along with ā€œWe’ve had Nukes for 70 years without losing a city. I wouldn’t worry. What could possibly go wrong.ā€

This is just a human rationality flaw.šŸ™

2:16 AM Ā· Jun 29, 2021


When does Jon Stewart signal it is finally okay to talk about progressing cognitive decline?

4:23 PM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

He isn’t the only one. Jon did the Wuhan lab leak. @TIME did ā€˜fortification’ 2020. @BarackObama got UAP and Wokeness. Brad Delong got to reveal NAFTA was social Darwinian…

But the rules are very clear on EXACTLY who is allowed to say ā€œPrevious Fringe view X is now Mainstream!ā€

4:59 PM Ā· Jun 29, 2021

What was special about Stewart was quite subtle. He didn’t say ā€œThe facts have changed.ā€ He said: it’s obvious & has always been so, that the Biosafety Level4 Bat Corona Virus lab is the likely origin while Colbert feigned being shocked: The Gated Institutional Narrative updated.

4:59 PM Ā· Jun 29, 2021


An irrational attachment to being able to feed their families & avoid reputational ruin on a going forward basis. Call it a hunch.

UAP with crappy video and without hard data is unbounded downside with limited upside for scientists.

It’s absurd: We don’t bring in our own team.

6:35 PM Ā· Jun 30, 2021


The fact that many of us have moved on from the UAP report is fascinating.

During the financial crisis, the phrase ā€œNon-Recourse Loanā€ was used to describe the government’s ā€˜relief’ strategy.

And folks just walked right by ā€œNon-Recourse Loansā€ as if it were just boring jargon.

4:41 AM Ā· Jul 4, 2021

@JohnGingyJo Read it *super* closely. That’s the only way it is so interesting.

4:49 AM Ā· Jul 4, 2021


Physics’ Overton Window.

We can talk about CRAZY stuff that’s irrelevant to our lives & never progresses: Boltzmann Brains, Many Worlds, String Theory Unification, AdS, Super-partners, etc.

We can’t talk about anything that COULD suddenly change everything. UAP, other TOEs, etc

5:34 PM Ā· Jul 9, 2021

My point isn’t at all that low probability topics are likely to change everything. It’s that we feel *safe* knowing certain crazy ideas always seem to lead nowhere. But we feel unsafe when we don’t know if what we’re looking at *could* surprise us by suddenly changing our world.

5:43 PM Ā· Jul 9, 2021

An example: In GU, relativity theory is recovered from the Observerse which is constructed around two separate spaces X and Y. Einstein’s Spacetime (a signature (1,3) 4-manifold with pseudo Riemannian metric) is recovered from observations of Y by X.

6:11 PM Ā· Jul 9, 2021

Another example. Some see spacetime as the commutative limit of a non-commutative manifold. That would be beyond relativity.

Others see topology changing operators that allow agents to change spacetime topologically. Again that would be beyond the usual relativity theory.

6:11 PM Ā· Jul 9, 2021

But in standard Relativity theory as an effective theory, I don’t think about FTL. Sorry.

6:11 PM Ā· Jul 9, 2021


Scratch the UAP story and you soon learn that there are a surprising number of seemingly sane people orbiting around the Pentagon who assert that UAP are particularly active around our nuclear weapons.

What to make of this? šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø But the above *can* be said *without* speculation.

4:46 PM Ā· Oct 8, 2021

Are they all insane? Don’t know. Seems unlikely.

Are they propagandized? Seems far fetched but possible.

Is it a Psy-op? Maybe.

Mass psychosis? Don’t think so. But it could be a self reinforcing belief.

But no one wants to chew up their credibility talking about these rumors.

4:51 PM Ā· Oct 8, 2021

And just so we are clear on the nature of the rumors, here is what you hear over and over again:

ā€œThe UAP aren’t merely hovering over nukes. The UAP know how to *shut down* nuclear weapons.ā€

This is why I never listened to UFO rumors BEFORE the DOD report. It’s just too crazy.

4:55 PM Ā· Oct 8, 2021


Things I don't believe we can't conclusively resolve:

A) COVID's origin.

B) The Jeffrey Epstein story.

C) UAP.

D) JFK assassination.

E) Vegas Shooting.

F) Extent of 'Democracy Fortifying' in 2020.

G) Efficacy of Non-Vaccines.

H) Mysterious WEF 'Build Back Better' mantra.

7:17 PM Ā· Oct 23, 2021

I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.

J) Adulteration of BLS CPI measure of inflation.

K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.

L) Sudden spike in fake 'Objective Third Party Fact Checking'.

M) Sudden "Diversity Equity Inclusion" explosion.

7:17 PM Ā· Oct 23, 2021

Q) Joe Biden's state of cognitive decline.

R) Nature of MSNBC campagin against Andrew Yang.

S) Nature of Dean Scream, Anti-Ron Paul and other interference in democracy by Mainstream media News.

T) Impact of loss of mandatory retirement on young people seeking work.

U) Rex84.

7:17 PM Ā· Oct 23, 2021

V) Collusion between National Academy and National Science foundation division of Policy Research and Analysis to fake demographic crisis in mid 1980s.

W) Lack on anyone building the significant & desperately needed new non-profit institutions despite skyhigh wealth inequality.

7:17 PM Ā· Oct 23, 2021

X) Loss of Academic Freedom across the board in Academe.

Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.

Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to @doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.

Moral: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.

7:17 PM Ā· Oct 23, 2021


@MLGACE Whatever our data is for UFO/UAP. Accelerations. Heat signature. Cloaking. Transmedia behavior. Cornering ability. I have no idea. I just know we aren't looking at high quality data and I know we have MUCH higher quality data than has been released.

5:52 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2021


After a zoom call yesterday with Avi Loeb, I’ve decided to join Harvard’s Galileo Project on its Research Team.

Time to de-stigmatize the whole topic and help the data talk. The claimed phenomenon of UFO/UAP, after all, should be a scientific question.

https://t.co/kx5NgtILML

5:24 PM Ā· Dec 20, 2021

A key point. We use cosmic rays as if they were from an accelerator. There is an outside chance that UAP should be thought of the same way.

If we’re hurting for new physical phenomena to analyze, some portion of our physics effort should be spent debunking or understanding UAP.

5:24 PM Ā· Dec 20, 2021

@delta_waverider There are many sightings that are bunk. Your issue is with the nature of the complement of that set. But debunking will need to be done in all future scenarios. Nature of the beast.

7:17 PM Ā· Dec 20, 2021

@michaelshermer I haven’t seen any compelling data. I have been told that such data exists in abundance from multiple sources that I trust. No idea how to square that.

9:04 PM Ā· Dec 20, 2021

@s_offiler @michaelshermer Not saying anything beyond that I find the videos released uncompelling as data. I find the incident super interesting. Would like to see the entire time series of data taken in by all sensors.

10:16 PM Ā· Dec 20, 2021


I have been dismayed by the senator before this.

But this is correct. And courageous. UAP is both a security and a scientific issue. Stop the giggles. Start the study.

Maybe I was too hasty about dismissing KG. Opening my mind again.

5:55 AM Ā· Dec 23, 2021

2022

Can someone authenticate the existence of this claim for me? I’m new to UFOs. Before the report on UAP this last summer, I would think this is BS.

Now I believe it’s more likely to be real, having updated my Bayesian priors. And, again, apologies to all of you I’ve denigrated.

3:40 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022

Is there such a text?

Has the USG owned up to it?

Is there a PDF of it circulating?

Are there others attached to Wright Patterson AFB, or the RIAS, or the Physical Fields institute of UNC Chappell Hill or Brown University’s Non Linear Dynamics Group, or the Glen L Martin Co.?

3:44 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022

Sorry for the weird specificity but I’m trying to link this to things that I know to be real and that I’ve been puzzled about for years that never made sense to me.

Also, it’s hard to fake an entire text competently. So this is interesting.

Thanks #ufotwitter.

3:48 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022


Hi Michael,

Not updating my priors on all UFO sightings. I’m updating my priors on ā€œThe Golden Age of General Relativityā€, B DeWitt, L Witten, RIAS, the Martin Company, etc.ā€ And I’m doing it based on a government report inconsistent with the closing report of BlueBook. And you?

4:20 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022

Dear @EricRWeinstein

According to UFOlogists 95% of all sightings for all time are explained by natural/terrestrial phenom (planes, blimps, geese, sun dogs, lens flares, etc.). 5% unexplained (≠ ET or Russian tech). X new sighting is made. Which bin is X most likely to be in?

4:05 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022

We have been spun. And as skeptics we have to notice the inconsistencies.

We were likely either spun this last summer, or spun at the closure of Operation BlueBook.

The whole thing sounds like total bullshit. But we also have a lot of weird stuff from real 1950s science.

4:26 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022

Who were Babson and Bahnson? Those stories don’t make much sense. Why Bryce and Cecile DeWitt and Peter Higgs in Chappell hill funded as part of a weird anti-gravity program?

Simple question: how did you tutor your priors last summer? Not at all? A tiny amount?

Skeptically, E

4:26 PM Ā· Jan 10, 2022


My colleague and friend Jesse Michels asked me to interview Dr. @haroldputhoff on UAP/UFO. Wasn’t sure how to do this, so we tried oscillating between steelmanning and critiquing what Puthoff was able to say within his obligations of non-disclosure.

Can we just end the secrecy?

11:42 AM Ā· Feb 12, 2022


For those of you speculating on channels reaching out to Sam Harris, myself and others on UFO/UAP. There was a minimum of one planned dissemination that got called off for reasons unknown. I am not at liberty to discuss. But I can say why people like Sam are likely to be quiet.

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022

What has so far been released to the public by government has been minimal. No one I know wants to incinerate credibility becoming a true believer over a tiny number of relatively low quality USG videos which, at least to me, prove absolutely nothing.

So then: why be interested?

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022

Because there is an ocean of weird behavior and claims coming from otherwise sober seeming USG and former USG people. And a lot of it is weirdly consistent. So I’m totally underwhelmed by the direct evidence so far. But I’m baffled by the indirect evidence. What generated this?

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022

I won’t speak for @SamHarrisOrg. But I failed to generate *any* good explanation for the repeated and fairly consistent assertions of DOD/IC types with no evident training in acting or theater. To say nothing of ordinary non-USG people. So…none of us knows what to think. Truly.

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022

Something huge is up. It could be a psychological operation. It could be next generation spoofing by an adversary. It could be mass psychosis. But I don’t want to speculate beyond a decision tree. Something huge *is* up. And I dug hard, but failed to get beyond indirect evidence.

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022

What is worse, the most parsimonious explanations are the obvious two:

A) Our government is engaged in deception and utterly brilliant at it.

B) šŸ‘½.

If the former, it is more competent than we ever suspected.

Everything else is less parsimonious. But I can’t make sense of it.

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022

One request: stop speculating. Some folks are reaching out. They pulled back a bit. And I for one may stop talking about this if asked due to the security issues. But that which has been shared with the public is not enough to go on. It’s the indirect evidence we are watching. šŸ™

3:13 PM Ā· May 12, 2022


I developed a private principle which has been useful in life. It says:

ā€œA fair coin can’t always land on its side, seemingly by accident, without constant, deliberately cryptic active management by others unseen.ā€

This UAP coin always seems to land on its side.

5:45 PM Ā· May 17, 2022

@MickWest Mick, I don’t know how to communicate this, but you seem to want to be a dedicated debunker here. What direct evidence has been shared with the public, on its own, doesn’t seem to require this level of aggressive debunking. It’s just not that compelling. I agree with you on that.

6:45 PM Ā· May 17, 2022

@MickWest Simply put, trying to turn it all into the occult + swamp gas + reflections on a lens + lying to get attention etc…doesn’t seem very compelling. Some of it is surely that, but something else is likely at play. There’s too much that doesn’t fit that description for it to so easy.

6:51 PM Ā· May 17, 2022

@MickWest Hope you are right. Or wrong. But this is seemingly a lot weirder than you are admitting. Too many grownups with security clearances and training telling too many similar stories at this point. Maybe it’s all fake. If so, I’d be impressed. But I don’t understand your confidence.

6:53 PM Ā· May 17, 2022

@MickWest Appreciate your perspective. Didn’t have that before. Thanks Mick.

10:15 PM Ā· May 17, 2022


I’m just going to say it:

Is this our BEST video/data/imagery when it comes to withstanding scrutiny?? Why choose this??

Let us guess: there will be yet more releases of things that are less impressive than ordinary photography, photoshop, CGI, or video games.

Enough already.

11:04 PM Ā· May 17, 2022

This is coming to feel like an infinite tease. Let’s stop making our nation, our military & our government look like idiots. Reveal or don’t. Show or don’t. We all get that there are security issues. But stop teasing with blobs, blurs and snippets less convincing than deep fakes.

11:04 PM Ā· May 17, 2022


My physics colleagues generally still have yet to incorporate what is going on in the changing UAP picture.

All of this lawyerly ā€œobservations that currently cannot be completely explainedā€ soft language in the absence of hard data is pretty confusing.

3:27 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

Imagine if an MD said to you ā€œFor legal reasons protecting our clinic, I can’t share your data with you, but it is not impossible that a still small number of atypical cells may be non locally replicating above baseline.ā€ as a way of letting you know you had metastasized tumor.

3:27 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

You might, or might not, even understand what a serious situation you were in. It all sounds so bloodless.

If you did understand it, you would want to see the data. It is YOUR data after all. Data about you.

That’s where we are. No real data. Bloodless language. Few scientists.

3:27 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

More or less, we are increasingly being told we have what *appear* to be *large* numbers of craft of unknown origin in our skies and seas taking an unusual interest in world military activities so that our own government has asymmetrically good data it doesn’t want to show us.

3:27 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

Some portion of the USG is saying we are repeatedly being visited by non human technology. Some other portion of the government is saying ā€œDon’t say thatā€ either because it is a lie or they want it to stay hidden.

The net effect: destruction of trust in government and science.

3:27 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

It is now time to inform us all. It is either an elaborate USG psyop hoax or something of incomparable significance. It’s not swamp gas anymore. It’s not Mylar balloons and a few people desperate to get on television.

But it is definitely time to end the soft language. It’s big.

3:27 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

@MickWest Mick, no offense, but at this point you are just wrong. There are factions within government, ex-government and government contracting, and some of them are saying that. Enough.

Or as you say: BS. Sorry.

11:51 PM Ā· Jun 9, 2022

@MickWest Mick, don’t take this the wrong way. But you are highly motivated and stigmatizing. When you ask ā€œwho?ā€ you are playing dumb. I have agreed with you that the videos aren’t compelling. But you don’t quit.

So either play the debunker or don’t. But this isn’t 2 guys and 3 videos.

1:45 AM Ā· Jun 10, 2022

@MickWest Obviously a lot of serious people are scared about reputational attacks. But this isn’t in range of just debunking a few videos anymore. Something is going on. We just can’t know with confidence if it is real deception or real phenomena until real data is released. Clear?

1:48 AM Ā· Jun 10, 2022

@MickWest I’m getting fatigued. I don’t talk much about the Tic Tac. Or the Zimbabwe kids. Or Lue. Or Remote Viewing. Clear?

There are an enormous number of IC and DOD related folks who want to know what we are seeing. And this ā€œDebunkingā€ grainy videos feels petty. It’s not the videos.

1:51 AM Ā· Jun 10, 2022

@MickWest I had to admit that there is an unbelievable amount of indirect evidence that something is going on with not much direct evidence.

That’s pretty weird. But pretending that this is either debunked or real misses the point. And I can’t keep having this nonprogressing interaction.

1:54 AM Ā· Jun 10, 2022


Happening in about an Hour at 2pm Pacific Time.

Join Astrophysics Professors Loeb & Keating and me as we discuss the current bizarre status of UFO/UAP in the sciences. Join us!

cc: @GalileoProject1, @DrBrianKeating #UFOTwitter

7:59 PM Ā· Jun 17, 2022

And…I’m back to being Twitter throttled it seems, so feel free to retweet if this seems like it has low engagement. Sorry!

8:01 PM Ā· Jun 17, 2022


Request for Help: have any of the technical folks claiming UAP knowledge been interviewed by technical folks w/ knowledge of General Relativity & Particle physics?

I would like to watch such a conversation dealing with the dry science of how UAP are claimed/thought to work. šŸ™

4:59 AM Ā· Jul 20, 2022

This could include someone like Eric Davis, Bob Lazar, Travis Taylor, etc. maybe at blackboard talking over equations/Lagrangians, rather than merely speaking in prose

And if this doesn’t exist, why doesn’t it exist? Forgive me, but I don’t know the history here. Seems odd. Thx.

4:59 AM Ā· Jul 20, 2022


I have been told this repeatedly by sober seeming USG and ex-USG folks. That both the US Navy and Air Force hold video of *arbitrarily* high quality backed up by extensive sensor data.

I have seen none of it. Zero. If I had signed away my right to disclose, I could not say this.

5:10 PM Ā· Sep 12, 2022

It may all be an elaborate lie. But the basic stories are pretty consistent. And one of them is that the UAP take an asymmetric interest in our advanced militaries. Unfortunately, that is also consistent with military disinformation, weapons R&D, spying, etc. i.e. cover stories.

5:14 PM Ā· Sep 12, 2022

So one version of events is that the military holds this high quality video/data because the UAP focused on our advanced militaries. The other version is that UAP cover stories are used by the Military to disguise what are sensitive security issues. But without the hard data… šŸ™

5:18 PM Ā· Sep 12, 2022


Under Newton, we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905.

Einstein then enforced house arrest to our solar system:1905-Now.

@elonmusk then said chemical rockets could get us 2 more spheres w Newtonian laws.

But survival hinges on going *beyond* Einstein, not back to Newton.

4:43 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022

I’m not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. That’s the basic plot.

Either there is freedom to leave based on new ideas, like GU, or the Einsteinian restrictions will persist.

If they persist; we probably can mildly elongate survival here by decades via wisdom.

4:49 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022

But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit.

This brings us to UFO/UAP. Assuming a distribution of life in the cosmos:: some life is behind us in science, with others ahead.

A (loose) argument then links UAP to survival:

5:01 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022

If life is abundant & we’re not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), I’d guess that UAP would be here if that is possible in Einstein’s successor theories. The absence of UAP is strong but *inconclusive* proof that Einstein’s restrictions persist in all theory.

5:05 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022

Hence my interest in UAP. UAP from distant worlds would be a strong indication that it is possible to diversify our shared risk which is that all known technological life is dependent on one atmosphere linking our three main existential risks:

A) Climate
B) Pathogen
C) Radiation

5:08 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022

So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didn’t take #UFO seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence.

And if #ScienceTwitter wants to know why I spun on a dime, it’s because it IS linked to the post-Einsteinian physics of our survival. šŸ™

5:15 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022


Just now on the Santa Monica freeway in broad daylight.

I know, I know, it’s slightly blurry. Granted… but it was gone before I knew it. https://t.co/uIqtYhOMHq

6:01 PM Ā· Sep 18, 2022

@vallez_joe Even @MickWest says this is unlikely to be a Mylar balloon.

12:49 AM Ā· Sep 19, 2022

@LoudmouthLisa UAP is the US government’s new name for UFO:

https://t.co/Ac2eksun7i

6:23 PM Ā· Sep 19, 2022


This official US government military website has now REMOVED its extremely bizarre insignia…as if this was just totally normal behavior.

2:11 AM Ā· Sep 27, 2022

I have no idea what’s going on or what the official narrative will be around this. I was told to focus on its color scheme as the main clue.

This pattern of ā€œextend, then retractā€ has been my consistent experience of the entire official USG, IC, DoD, part of the UAP/UFO world.šŸ™

2:11 AM Ā· Sep 27, 2022

Though I’d get some help, trying to figure out what the heck is actually going on. Thanks Lue. https://t.co/9bkSYNnzXt

8:06 PM Ā· Sep 29, 2022


1) General Relativity 2) (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry 3) Quantum Field Theory 4) Material Science/Condensed Matter 5) Nuclear Physics/Weaponry 6) Disinformation Theory 7) Cult Indoctrination/Deprogramming 8) Propaganda 9) Preference Falsification Theory 10) Mansfield Amendment

10:08 PM Ā· Oct 12, 2022

11) Science Policy Theory (V Bush) 12) Selection (Abstracted) 13) Comparative Eschatology 14) Anti-Gravity Pseudo-science involving top physicists and mathematicians in the era of the So-Called ā€˜Golden age of General Relativity’. 15) GU 16) Mind control.

Remember: you asked! ;-)

10:08 PM Ā· Oct 12, 2022

@thatdudej6 @Deepfryguy76 @Puthoffbyputho1 @dwpasulka @TUPACABRA2 @FullStackLogan Many decision makers interpret UFO-UAP in religious terms. And the population has an enormous pre-existing memetic complex of religious ideology. So it is essential. Even if you are a hard core atheist.

10:18 PM Ā· Oct 12, 2022


I’m happy to answer a few.

It’ll be fewer than I’d like. I was invited to participate in the press conference about to start, but that project is totally separate, so I politely declined the gracious offer of my hosts, as I came here as *unaffiliated* observer.

How may I help?

11:50 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

If you’re not interested in my responses, or feel I owe you total personal disclosure, I politely decline in advance and suggest you unfollow. Any abuse of good will ends in a block. Those are my rules so that I can say all I might to those genuinely interested. Fair? Let’s go!

11:52 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@DasWoolf I was not expecting to speak. The guest of honor, Lue Elizondo, became unavailable at the last minute. I was asked to step in. As a courtesy I agreed, and shared some ideas that represent no one but myself as a private US citizen working with publicly available info. Specifics?

11:57 AM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@andyinberlin I am not as sure as you are that this what is going on. It’s a matryoshka problem. I’m convinced that many people you think of as insiders are not really inside enough. The UAP/UFO community leaps to MANY conclusions as if this is fun. This is not fun if you are serious about it.

12:02 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@ALean_Skye I don’t think people understand disclosure properly. Consider layers:

A) The basic *claimed* phenomena.
B) Associate phenomena.
C) Cover up of the above.
D) People in the know living a lie.
E) Outsiders being destroyed to keep secrets.
F) Outsiders being forced to live lies.

12:06 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@ALean_Skye Disclosure likely has to do with F) as much as anything. No matter what A) Turns out to be. Which I still don’t really know. If you are fighting for disclosure, don’t over focus on whether we are prepared for A).

I’m not inflating my level of knowledge here. I still don’t know.

12:09 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@andyinberlin I see a lot of people struggling under a heavy weight. People take their NDAs very seriously.

12:11 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@dkb003 Official panels tend to be tightly controlled in advance through use of insiders. Occasionally that screws up and you get a Jeff Sachs (Lancet) or a Richard Feynman/Gen Kutyna (Challenger). Galileo Project is an outsider project. Prefer the latter.

12:14 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@DasWoolf Technology is the entry point *if* recovered craft are real. I’ve seen no such proof. None.

But it is *psychotic* not to have Particle Theorists, General Relativists and Differential Geometers all over our US effort. I have yet to meet one in two years. Makes me very suspicious.

12:18 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@DasWoolf One thought is that it is very hard to make up ghost stories about how Alcubierre Drives, Wormholes, Time Dilation, etc REALISTICALLY account for this with actual specialists.

I mean, I get it. But it’s nonsense. This is not about tech. It’s about post-GR/SM physics or a psyop.

12:22 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@DasWoolf It could sorta kinda maybe be a cover story for advanced tech. But I can’t get that to make sense yet. Maybe my failure of imagination.

12:23 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@delbel156 If others have gone beyond GR/SM to navigate/settle the cosmos, I don’t think they would let us leave this solar system with the BS we see in Russia/Ukraine, Wuhan etc. We look like a crazy species about to unlock the source code. It’s unbelievable. We look like savage fools.

12:28 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@delbel156 Just got warned. You want to know why I don’t tweet? Sorry all. Write to Twitter. I’m out. https://t.co/8aR5F0juYf

12:30 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@delbel156 This account is throttled beyond belief. Check the graph over time. Check the level of reputational attack. Check the DOJ ready to block Elon. Go review portal Episode 21. The level of narrative control is through the roof. Wake up. Look at the patterns. All FUD. All suppression. https://t.co/949t7DAPsS

12:33 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@delbel156 I’m trying to keep this channel open.

The Portal is a communal resource. It reappears when you both need it and are prepared to fight for it. I cannot answer the interpersonal attacks myself as a public figure. Think about it a bit: It’s not haters. It’s a bit more serious.šŸ™

12:41 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022


Willing to answer a few more Tweets on the San Marino UAP conference where I unexpectedly was asked to fill in for @LueElizondo. I’m likely to get throttled & harassed yet again. When and if the beloved Twitter nanny algorithm starts again, I’ll call it a night here in Rome.

Go! https://t.co/ZmhNnaRyIe

11:17 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

Same rules as before. No changes on my part. I’m doing this only because I am not trying to hide anything that I am in a reasonable position to share and many of you want to know what the heck is going on as much as I do. But there are limits. Such is life.

Shoot.

11:21 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@McLuhanStates @LueElizondo There is a lot of loose talk about dimensionality. Keep in mind that I have zero direct evidence of the phenomena. So this is wildly premature.

My interest here is that GU replaces one manifold with two in a bundle structure and adds BOTH temporal and spatial dimensions.

11:24 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@McLuhanStates @LueElizondo As the author of GU, I still don’t know how to think in multiple temporal dimensions. The math is quite exotic. But I at least know through GU that the math can FORCE us to confront ultra hyperbolic PDE. It would change everything we know if unscreened. No simple Hamiltonian.

11:26 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@McLuhanStates @LueElizondo I wish people would stop talking about higher dimensional beings though. If GU is on point, then we are also higher dimensional beings. So I could do without Exoticism. If this is in any way real, we should reserve speech for precise meanings. And I don’t know if it is real. Yet.

11:31 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@prowl4uap @LueElizondo Here goes. I still feel like this FEELS like bullshit. Particularly the number of explicit depictions of Tetrapod hominid like beings.

But the truckloads of indirect evidence suggests NHI. I just don’t have a way of squaring this. And the ā€œexperiencersā€ are breaking my heart.

11:35 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@prowl4uap @LueElizondo I wasn’t prepared for this part to be honest. I’ve met so many voices who’s lives were taken over by an experience that they seemingly didn’t want. People breaking down. As far from attention seeking as you can imagine with no theater background. It’s pretty hard to explain away.

11:37 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@prowl4uap @LueElizondo Why would ordinary folks ruin their lives like this? No money in it. No desire for fame. No other signs of shifted reality. So I don’t know what to say.

The absence of direct evidence screams BS. The indirect evidence screams some wildly new thing in town. And I’m too dumb here.

11:41 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@mikedduffey @LueElizondo Don’t know. Less if not asked to do something official. I hate this topic. It’s an infinite conundrum. Always a new hint. Never just some actual solid trustworthy data.

I’ve had quite enough space opera and national security runaround. Let’s get to the meal. Too many appetizers.

11:43 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@montanacasey @LueElizondo Don’t know who that is. I see the name around. But I’m not really in this space. It’s embarrassing. But I’m not a ufologist. And there is so much ufology that I’m not up on this stuff. My fault.

11:45 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@smbodie3 @LueElizondo People were very kind. Apparently I did some wrong things on stage. But a condition of taking this on the night before was that I would be me. They decided this is real. I don’t have that data. I am still spread over real / not real until I see something super clear & concrete.

11:47 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@twitpucker @LueElizondo I’d start with academic freedom and civility. There is more than enough here to DEMAND answers. This belongs to science as much as it does to NatSec. We don’t need a Fauci for UAP. We need physics and math to begin. Biology if warranted. Let’s just be serious if it is a threat.

11:51 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@twitpucker @LueElizondo The gigglers & shamers & accusers need to get a pacifier and a juice box for a time out. We gave out too many PhDs to mediocre souls. It’s a disaster. It’s nuts that they’re STILL here to inhibit consideration of this after all the claims by USG.

Too much inclusion of trolls.

11:54 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@BostonsBuddha @twitpucker @LueElizondo It appears to be titrated. Which I dislike. At some point foreplay made sense. That was a while ago. Enough.

11:55 PM Ā· Oct 24, 2022

@StevenBelmont4 @LueElizondo We’re now waiting for a cataclysmic event to arrive in a Poisson process. We aren’t getting it. Biden & Putin & Xi & Kim & Khamenei & Zelensky are not getting where we are. It’s like they’re throwing a rave on a life boat surrounded by oceanic whitetips. Who are these people?

12:00 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@StevenBelmont4 @LueElizondo We have all our eggs in this basket and we are focused on Eastern Ukraine & Chips in Taiwan like the world didn’t change last century forever? I’m totally lost. I don’t want to be here for the Poisson process. I want to be somewhere with an atmosphere and real distance from this.

12:02 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@RGoddardishere @LueElizondo Would prefer not to. I need data and an end to NatSec paternalism. This is either serious or it isn’t. If it isn’t, stop wasting time. If it is, you need the physicists and geometers at a minimum. Where are they??

12:04 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@codingfodder @LueElizondo Read @notevenwrong’s excerpts of the David E Kaplan interview. We need to clean house to revitalize physics as if our lives depend on its progress. Anyone who wants to whine about taxpayer dollars for theoretical physics gets thrown out of the planning discussion. So destructive.

12:08 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@UAPDAO @LueElizondo Yes…but it’s like space opera. Lots of claims. I’d like to see something. Isn’t it a bit weird to hear these super detailed stories with hard NO EVIDENCE this even happened?

It’s embarrassing frankly. Like Stag-o-Lee stories around a campfire. Only from serious people.

12:12 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@galacticfuton Been going on for too long. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø

12:13 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@207isHeaven I’m not read in anywhere. Not an insider unless I have to become one.

12:15 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@SergheiIancenco @McLuhanStates @LueElizondo There’s an operation called ā€œPull Backā€ in differential topology. It’s akin to pulling back data from a record album. You don’t hear the album all at once even though the data is all there at once. We’d be pullbacks into 4D from 14D w/ both 4D & 14D existence. Bit of a mind flip.

12:19 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@nickthadude_86 @LueElizondo Many. Of either Material vehicles or spoofing and disinformation. It feels like a spoof that is too big for anyone or any group to pull off. Like way too big. So I think it’s probably real. Just can’t believe it has no solid evidence. I don’t get how this is possible.

12:21 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@TheCertainT @Klupperz Let me answer this. I don’t think we are alone in the universe. So a lot rests on GR being effectively a moat making travel so cumbersome as to be not worth attempting. If that’s wrong; it’s pretty arrogant to think we are alone in the solar system. Post-GR changes a lot of odds.

12:24 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@TheCertainT @Klupperz I promise you India would keep the North Sentinelese from leaving and causing trouble if the Islanders figured out Science and Fusion Wepons before they figured out how to escape and build vehicles to escape their island. Think about it.

12:27 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@lololmaoha @LueElizondo Magic spoon has weird mouth feel. But it’s okay.

12:28 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@Intriguing_Post @LueElizondo Tetrapods are the least interesting beings. Because then it’s likely just earth life or we were seeded from them. Tells us little about Post-GR escape. Post-GR is everything to me. Can we travel the cosmos? Dunno.

ā€œOur home is in the stars or not at all.ā€

I believe that.

12:32 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@207isHeaven No.

12:40 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@kerskine They are running out of road. So it is way up. People are fed up.

12:42 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@YungJozuz Yes.

12:43 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben83724 Can’t answer.

12:43 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@DannyDeck68 There was a lot of disinformation around the Golden Age of GR. It’s mostly in the public domain. But it requires piecing together.

12:44 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben_koski Last Question of the Night: where did the top mathematicians and physicists go after the Mansfield amendment(s)? How can you have UAP where I am the only voice loudly pointing out that Real Alien Vehicles would like require new physical law. We can account for every relevant PhD.

12:48 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben_koski Where are the physicists and Geometers? Hint hint.

If they are not out here, it’s likely all BS. If they are here, they are hidden in plain sight. There just aren’t that many of us. Technology won’t work if you don’t know the relevant science. That’s not engineering or MatSci.

12:52 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben_koski Stop dreaming about FTL. Or element 115. Or Alcubierre GR. Or electogravitics. It’s bizarre that we discuss this so much.

First Ask: where are our relevant experts? Imagine you want the top 25 GR/SM/DiffGeometers for a matter of national security? Put together that list.

12:55 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben_koski If those folks aren’t out here then we are talking about a psyop or a giant government blunder endangering us all. If they ARE here, you know their names. Work backwards. Is there an NSA for UAP? If so what is its address? Come on guys. Not many speak this language. Small club.

12:58 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben_koski What happened with the Mansfield amendment & why does no one discuss this? We used to have our top people on this but we called it something else. Where did it go? Either it ended or it didn’t. It’s a tiny world. Just don’t get all Qanon. It’s a big story: Treat it w/ respect.šŸ™

1:01 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022

@ben_koski Hope that helped clear things up. I was never meant to speak at this conference. Keep that in mind. Goodnight.

1:02 AM Ā· Oct 25, 2022


Let me say two things.

A) I have always believed that almost all Unidentified Flying Objects are just that: something unremarkable that is not identified.

B) That has nothing to do with the issue of the remainder. It takes no more than a *single* confirmed inexplicable event.

1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022

Beyond that, as I have told you, I am sure that I am being used by at least some of those who have come to talk to me. But I cannot come up with any explanation for some of the representations made to me. And I get more fed up by the day with USG playing ā€œLucy & the footballā€.

1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022

National Security isn’t license to gaslight & ruin the lives of ordinary folks who aren’t participating in IC games. It’s cruel, abusive & totally UnAmerican. Come up with better cover if you need it. But between bioweapons/UAP gaslighting, you’re playing god. And you’re not him.

1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022

Shabbat Shalom everyone. Have a great weekend.

1:18 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022

@Methedra And often forced to speak as if one voice. Don’t forget that part.

10:33 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022

@CarpathianMts Happy to NEVER mention UFO/UAP ever again and work quietly. Totally up to what the interested community wants. I hate this topic. I just think it is clear that it appears to be critically important. Even if it is a USG headfake.

10:36 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022

@nickpopemod I say exactly the same. But, to be fair, the skeptics can point to zero incontrovertible evidence (at least so far as I am aware)…Which is a big deal in my book. The soft evidence is not in their favor. The absence of hard evidence *available to citizens & scientists* is. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø

11:12 AM Ā· Oct 29, 2022


This is an odd moment. Official Washington tells us we have lost control of airspace. But also we should not in any way freak out because it is mostly just a combination of Hypersonic enemy drones of rival powers and some ultra high performing seagulls. And some alien non-aliens.

2:44 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

Which is to say…we clearly have two factions in government not allowed to file separate reports. The result is total intellectual incoherence.

So the whole thing comes across like the USG is having its first collective magic mushroom trip in real time. It’s so embarrassing.

2:44 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

Good luck on this report. If I had to guess it will again be super interesting if unpacked and as boring as possible on the surface. But I have little confidence in my own guess.

I am going to drop my interest way back if things stay like this too much longer. But let’s see. šŸ™

2:44 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@528vibes Let’s put it this way. I will lose interest in government disclosure as a self protective measure. This is an abusive relationship. Whose government is it? Ours? Theirs? Lockheed’s? Enough.

I’m playing by the rules. They aren’t.

3:07 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@seanonolennon Done.

3:19 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@IdesignsWak Deliberate misinterpretation to smear never gets old.

4:09 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@seanonolennon Let’s get out of here.

Miss you too. And happy belated if I didn’t call. I think I did or sent a voice message. But the days run together honestly.

4:52 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@MickWest Ya know, it kinda did Mick. It speaks with many voices. And some of those heads said stuff.

I really don’t get why we are often apart. We agree there is no incontrovertible concrete data in the public domain. And I never mention those grainy videos because they don’t impress me.

8:03 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@MickWest Anytime you can clear up a bird or a weather ballon, or flares or a jet with a funny reflection, I am thrilled.

I’m really grateful for that part of what you have contributed. So thank you.

But the other part, leaves me feeling like I just don’t get something.

Take care.

8:06 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022

@UAP_LEE @dsmethurst66 Yeah. That must be it. ;-)

8:08 PM Ā· Oct 31, 2022


One of the questions about UFOs that needs to be asked, and that I don’t hear much about, is: ā€œHas the US government built fake UFOs?ā€

UFO people are so focused on whether there are real UFOs that they don’t push hard enough on this question.

Allow me to share a thought or two. https://t.co/B1FXSmb9Z3

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

When I first realized I was totally wrong about UFO/UAP, I was shocked by how many folks have very similar stories about recovered crashes of very similar advanced vehicles.

It was mind blowing in 2 ways.

A) We have real crashed vehicles. And/Or B) We built fake alien vehicles. https://t.co/4sOOXDtPoW

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

At this point I’m reasonably sure there are things that look like cool alien vehicle in some hangers. But I also grew up near Hollywood and remember super cool looking fake space cars visible off the Hollywood freeway.

So: does anyone have stories of building fake UFOs for USG? https://t.co/3JuMmOwFRZ

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

As you likely guessed, all the photos in this thread are fake military equipment. The airbase is totally fake. The dummy tanks are often inflated on the battlefield. The fake tank pieces are bolted on to real cars.

Q: Did we build fake UFOs in places like Wright-Patterson AFB? https://t.co/VRD9vroHdm

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

After studying this issue for 2yrs, I’m pretty convinced that there ARE wild looking vehicles in secret high security locations. But I also find NO SIGN OF OUR TOP PHYSICISTS. That is a huge red flag. If you had fake UFOs, you would have a puzzle for physics: What is the science?

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

A true recovered interstellar craft would be like LHC or LIGO data: potential scientific data for physics beyond the Standard Model and General Relativity.

But if the crafts are fake, you would be crazy to let the A-team physicists near them. It would blow up in your face.

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

So my ignorant question is this: are there stories of building fake UFOs for sites in Nevada? Ohio? Are there fake retrieval teams? To what extent does faking military equipment spill into faking a UFOgasm for decades?

Because there are too many very similar craft stories. https://t.co/CfXOh0yXdW

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

So, at this point, the stories of craft kept at secret locations is most likely to be true in my opinion. But it is also true that all the top physics talent that was working only semi-covertly on suspicious gravity projects left by the early 1970s. So any craft may be faked.

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

Either way, it’s a big deal. Everything changed in the early 70s. It’s impossible to say how much. The moment the Mansfield amendment came in, physics began to stagnate. And ā€œQuantum Gravityā€ destroyed our culture of science. We don’t even whisper about its ā€œAnti-Gravityā€ origin.

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

So to sum up: there do *appear* to be craft. But advanced armies all build dummy weapons.

Q1: Do we have any Fakes? Q2: Do we have only Fakes? Q3: Why do we talk almost *exclusively* about Technology and not new Post-GR/SM science if there are *any* real interstellar craft?

šŸ™

4:13 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

Note Added: many readers are making wild inferences about me talking about flying fakes. I was very clear that this was about apparent crafts on the ground and in Hangars in Nevada, Ohio & elsewhere.

Wild or bad inference patterns will get you blocked. I don’t have time. Thx.

5:16 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

Uh. I’m kind of coming to the end of my patience w/ this line of thinking.

PhD Scientists aren’t the ā€˜help.’ We are the backbone. And, honestly, I would never treat ANY service people this way! The security risks of embittering scientists by treating them like servants is nuts.

6:44 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022

This isn’t 18th century France. Just a thought.

6:44 PM Ā· Nov 10, 2022


I don’t think there is any history of my ever commenting on @SBF_FTX.

It is because I never deeply understood what was going on when it was explained to me. I’m not going to lie: I felt dumb.

Moral: be very careful celebrating success that you don’t understand for its own sake.

4:31 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022

2) I'm really sorry, again, that we ended up here.

Hopefully things can find a way to recover. Hopefully this can bring some amount of transparency, trust, and governance to them.

Ultimately hopefully it can be better for customers.

4:31 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022

Other things that made/make me feel dumb:

Bernie Madoff’s Returns
COVID origin questions = Racism
Fauci
Hilary’s Inevitability
Quantum Gravity
Jeffrey Epstein’s CCY trading Claims
CPI Construction
UFO/UAP
Chinese Graduate Students in STEM
Open Borders
Defund The Police
DEI
NIH

4:46 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022

@Deepneuron @SBF_FTX I can’t explain curvature tensor to 5 year olds. I admit I don’t even understand the rule of ā€œif you can’t explain it simply you don’t understand it.ā€ It seems totally wrong to me! Oh well.

4:51 PM Ā· Nov 12, 2022


@TOEwithCurt I think that there is a lot more deliberate mis/disinformation right now and a modest increase in the level of information. So far as I can make out, they seem related. It’s as if as soon as more needles appear, haystacks arrive that make them hard to find.

I’m pretty annoyed.

7:57 PM Ā· Nov 19, 2022

@TOEwithCurt As to intuition….we don’t and shouldn’t have much.

Hard UFO/UAP data is supposed to be all about the unprecedented. Disinformation and superstition is all well precedented. So intuition should say it’s all BS. The whole thing comes down to hard data.

Intuition here is useless.

8:02 PM Ā· Nov 19, 2022

2023

So far as I am aware, there is as yet ZERO evidence of UAP/UFO craft defying the laws of known physics based on high quality publicly available data.

There are simply an enormous number of videos, rumors, eye witness accounts, and indirect indications.

What should we propose?

2:35 PM Ā· Feb 7, 2023

I have no idea what the ground truth is on UAP. But I strongly believe it’s time for science to take UAP seriously, & push for answers. Even if every single one is mundane, we will surely learn things along the way. There is LOTS of evidence. It’s time to look for PROOF w/data!

3:06 AM Ā· Feb 7, 2023

I don’t mean to rain on any parades, but the complete absence of high quality data made available to scientists is both a MAJOR clue and an impediment to figuring this out. It is interpreted as the government not wanting scientists to investigate. Thus, it makes it sound like BS.

2:35 PM Ā· Feb 7, 2023


My position on UFO/UAP is that this is something *huge* that I’m simply not smart enough to figure out. I’m not going to lie and say it’s all weather balloons. And I’m not going to lie and say we have solid high quality publicly available data when we don’t: we are being starved.

3:05 PM Ā· Feb 8, 2023

Did I miss some tweets, Eric, where you slowly pivoted from the "government have kept all of this data secret, this must mean something, why is no one taking this seriously" to the message today?

I haven't got a strong stance here but felt like there's been a change in yours.

2:33 PM Ā· Feb 8, 2023

UFOs are ā€œfunā€ for many people. There is another group of us who don’t find it ā€œfunā€. I don’t want to believe. I don’t want to not believe. I want to know either way.

I dislike this topic not b/c of the UFO, but b/c I’m being manipulated, lied to and played by those in the know.

3:10 PM Ā· Feb 8, 2023

Point blank: we are being starved for information. My response to being starved for information is not to guess which branch of the decision tree is correct but to share with you the contradictory evidence both direct and circumstantial. I don’t know why others pretend to know.šŸ™

3:13 PM Ā· Feb 8, 2023

2024

Many of you are asking for my reaction regarding the just released @DoD_AARO report. There is much to say. I want to think carefully before saying more. I am not unsympathetic to US National Security needs in this.

In February of 2023, @joerogan invited me for four hours onto the world's largest English Language program (episode #1945) to describe in detail the mystery of potential US Government involvement in UFOs and Post-Einsteinian physics during the mysterious "Golden Age of General Relativity". It has been seen and discussed by millions as expected. I was thus eager to see how thorough this report would be by combing it for search strings raised in my research.

REFERENCES:

"Glenn L Martin Company": 0
Bryce Cecile DeWitt: 0
Institute for Field Physics: 0
Research Institute for Advanced Study: 0
Louis Witten: 0
Roger Babson: 0
Agnew Bahson: 0
Gravity Research Foundation: 0
Gravity: 1 (pg. 32)
Rennaisance Technologies: 0
UNC Chapel Hill: 0
Solomon Lefschetz: 0
Freeman Dyson: 0
Herman Bondi: 0
Negative Mass: 0
"Scientific and Intelligence Aspects of the UFO Problem"
Australian Intelligence 1971 Report: 0
Australia: 0
George Rideout: 0
Edward Teller: 0
Robert Oppenheimer: 0
David Kaiser: 0
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base: 1 (pg. 18)
Curtis Wright Aerospace Buffalo: 0
Pascal Jordan: 0
Mansfield Ammendment: 0
Joshua Goldberg: 0
Office of Global Access: 0
University of Texas, Austin: 0
Center for Dynamical Systems: 0
Physics: 5 (pgs. 16-17, 53)
Relativity: 0
Albert Einstein: 0
George Bunker: 0
Welcome Bender: 0
George Trimble: 0

CONCLUSION: This report purports to have studied the questions raised surrounding UFO/UAP related research of the US federal Government. It, in fact, appears to have studied a carefully chosen SUBSET of the claims selected from among those which appear to have mass appeal to the so-called "UFO Community." It completely, or nearly completely, avoided reporting on all questions surrounding issues which have been raised in serious research and by PhD level researchers who have raised scientific questions in this area. This continues the pattern of using PhD level government scientists who appear to avoid the actual research questions most likely to involve sensitve Special Access Programs and Stovepiped Research which are compartmentalized by design. Whether the omissions are due to issues of avoidance, misdirection (e.g. so-called Limited Hangout strategy), ignorance or incompetance cannot be discerned from the information given.

RECOMMENDATION: It is simply not possible to treat the current AARO report as historically complete or comprehensive. To gain the public trust, the successor to AARO would have to expand and redo this analysis with input from domain professionals who are trusted by the public not to have an apparent agenda or government background (e.g. Prof. David Kaiser of MIT or Dr. Nima Arkani Hamed of IAS, Prof. Brian Keating of UCSD, Avi Loeb of Harvard) Otherwise, it is relatively easy for scientists to "Follow the Silence" in government reports to see what is *not* being addressed or discussed.

ERW-X-post-1766244211987476587-GIL1a0fa8AA-5bB.jpg
11:26 PM Ā· Mar 8, 2024

Today the DoD released our Historical Record Report Volume 1.

AARO’s report covers more than 70 years of the U.S. record relating to UAP, draws from interviews, archival research, and partnerships across government and industry.

Read it here: https://statics.dod.teams.microsoft.us/evergreen-assets/safelinks/1/atp-safelinks.html

3:53 PM Ā· Mar 8, 2024

NOTE: Above reference to the work of Prof. Kaiser and to JRE #1945 are included to establish that both were in the public domain, independent, in high levels of agreement, and that there was *ample* time for AARO to investigate these claims which appear not to have any impact.

11:32 PM Ā· Mar 8, 2024

2025

No. You are correct.

Assume even that beings were using additional hidden dimensions to traverse space and time. You still wouldn’t talk like this. It’s just mental sludge.

I can riff a bunch of equally vapid vibe terms:

ā€œDigital Seraphimā€
ā€œEnergetic Consciousnessā€
ā€œDistributed Cognitionā€
ā€œDisembodied Guardiansā€
ā€œPlasmic Willā€
ā€œResonance Lifeformsā€
ā€œVibrational Travelersā€
ā€œRetrocausal Projectorsā€
ā€œTrans-Temporal Sentinalsā€
ā€œAutonomous Vaccum Faunaā€

This is just super embarrassing. This is the level of us as a country now.

1:22 PM Ā· Aug 14, 2025

Am I crazy to assume that this is internally facing propaganda rather than actual interdimensional beings?

12:46 PM Ā· Aug 14, 2025

šŸ”„šŸšØBREAKING NEWS: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just broke the internet after claiming she has seen evidence of "interdimensional beings" with credible people reporting "movement outside of time and space."

"They call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we currently have."

"I can tell you without getting into classified conversations that there have been incidents where very credible people have reported that there have been movements outside of time and space."

This comes after claims of a possible alien invasion in December by Harvard scientist, and several reports of aliens and UAPs in the last 4 years like the incident at the Bayside mall in Miami which has never been fully reported.

Something is coming whether it be real or fake be prepared.

11:16 PM Ā· Aug 13, 2025

I then asked AI to come up with equally meaningless technical terms based on ā€œInterdimensional beingsā€. Here are the first 50 results:

1. Quantum Nomads
2.Etheric Sentinels
3.Chrono-Weavers
4.Harmonic Architects
5.Phase-Walking Entities
6.Neuro-Aether Collectives
7.Prismatic Wanderers
8.Dreamfield Navigators
9.Celestial Executors
10.Photon Shepherds
11.Metacognitive Guilds
12.Temporal Lattice Keepers
13.Spectral Conservators
14.Luminal Envoys
15.Gravimetric Messengers
16.Pan-Dimensional Heralds
17.Subspace Wardens
18.Chrono-Sovereigns
19.Singularity Whisperers
20.Interstitial Custodians
21.Reality Sculptors
22.Hyperspace Envoys
23.Archetypal Infiltrators
24.Thoughtform Navigators
25.Omniversal Pathfinders
26.Quantum Seers
27.Hyperconscious Collectives
28.Mindwave Pilgrims
29.Scalar Frequency Keepers
30.Eidolon Oracles
31.Astral Cartographers
32.Metatronic Stewards
33.Voidborn Shepherds
34.Causal Horizon Monitors
35.Memetic Wardens
36.Phase Entanglers
37.Pulseborne Architects
38.Resonance Nomads
39.Energy-Field Sentinels
40.Tachyonic Dreamers
41.Infrasonic Voyagers
42.Consciousness Carriers
43.Zero-Point Custodians
44.Orbital Keepers
45.Psychewave Diplomats
46.Entropic Harvesters
47.Lightwoven Inhabitants
48.Chrono-Spiral Navigators
49.Plasmatic Envoys
50.Harmonic Continuum Guardians

1:24 PM Ā· Aug 14, 2025


Yes.

I think the US almost certainly has at least one fake UFO program. A decoy.

Think of that decoy as putting out bad information to confuse adversaries. But what does it due to our own scientists?

Now imagine a post relativistic gravitational theory group PRTG here on earth. You would imagine that our own government would be working with that PRTG. Because that group is trying to figure out if we are trapped here, the last thing you want to do is to have the f****ng decoy program polluting our own understanding.

I think the morons in our decoy program forgot to bring in their own PRTGs. Because to a PRTG, UFOs….real NHI craft….would be key data. And fake craft is just feeding your own scientists poison and polluting their own understanding.

So we don’t have ANY top tier PRTG in this game. That’s what makes me think there is only a fake UFO decoy program. OTOH…

7:09 AM Ā· Nov 30, 2025

Can you explain your thoughts a little better?

Have you put any thought into what’s actually going on specifically in the null hypothesis case? What’s this all for? It’s not clear to me at all that there is any sensibility in either direction.

2:27 AM Ā· Nov 30, 2025

Continued….on the other hand it sure looks like in the 1950s we set up two cut outs and created ā€œThe Golden Age Of General Relativityā€.

And then in the wake of Howard Morland and John Aristotle Phillips, it kinda looks like we stagnated and soft sunsetted real open research in fundamental physics with a preposterous story about String Theory and Quantum Gravity. Which makes no sense to anyone honest after 40 years of failure.

So that is pretty odd. Scientists don’t shoot down new ideas for 40 years to protect one known not to work. That isn’t how science works.

So that opens the question, is there a second secret physics program (like a Manhattan Project for Gravity 2.0) and perhaps a second UFO program. A non decoy. And while I see no direct evidence of NHI craft, we do have a mystery as to why the U.S. would destroy its own commanding advantage in fundamental Physics over string theory and its obvious failure. It just doesn’t pass the laugh test.

The only thing I can wonder about is if we figured a bit of new physics out that lead to new Manhattan Project-level secrecy around all fundamental physics. Maybe 50 high ranking people (e.g. @SecRubio ) aren’t lying with the skill of Pacino and Brando. šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø.

Something is way off. We aren’t doing physics in the open any more. And we aren’t asking our own people for help. So you would be crazy not to wonder…WTAF?

This is, unfortunately, consistent with a second Manhattan project on Gravity. This is exactly how secret science works. For example: We stagnated chain reaction research outside los Alamos and continued doing successful physics inside the compound.

Well, the first part of this is true today. We are dead in the water in university level fundamental physics beyond GR and the SM. The second part is unknown. Is there a place where you can get paid to succeed at physics rather than paid to do things which are known not to work? I just don’t know.

Moral: Physics when done well and right, is very very dangerous after all. And I want us to get back to doing physics that will go way beyond Einstein.

Even the kind that goes boom:šŸ’„

šŸ™

7:09 AM Ā· Nov 30, 2025

Related Pages