Jump to content

Peer Review: Difference between revisions

53 bytes removed ,  20 April 2020
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
"A technical argument by a trusted author, which is hard
"A technical argument by a trusted author, which is hard
to check and looks similar to arguments known to be
to check and looks similar to arguments known to be
correct, is hardly ever checked in detail."ย  โ€” [https://twitter.com/i/status/1128389263526060032 [https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2014/voevodsky-origins Vladimir Voevodsky]]
correct, is hardly ever checked in detail."ย  โ€” [https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2014/voevodsky-origins Vladimir Voevodsky]
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


== Resources &amp; References ==
== Resources &amp; References ==


* [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1230888559411789824 Relevant tweet] by Eric that exemplifies how peer review fails.
* [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1230888559411789824 Relevant tweet] by Eric that exemplifies how peer review fails.
170

edits