Jump to content

Gauge Theory: Difference between revisions

Gauge Theory (edit)

Revision as of 04:37, 13 February 2026

12,302 bytes added ,  Friday at 04:37
→‎2025
Line 3,109: Line 3,109:


=== 2025 ===
=== 2025 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1884378560846258224
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This is not about personal ethics. This isn’t about my not understanding the needs for state secrets. This isn’t about a child’s belief that we can all be truthful at all times. I get all of that. Always have.
This is about PREPOSTEROUS mid level NatSec people who are bad at their jobs, and who have no concept of science and professional ethics, incompetently lying to people smarter and more public spirited than themselves and then using IC or DOD cover to discredit anyone who doesn’t go along.
This is moronic NatSec incompetence.
I want moronic NatSec incompetents out of our science. Out of our data. Out of my work.
You want to do Manhattan Project level stuff? Great. Keep it away from civilian scientists or offer them an opportunity to help. Keep it safe, secret and public spirited.
It’s over. I’m done. Tell me what is going on with the fix put in on H-1B, CPI, “Quantum Gravity”, Gauge Theory etc or expect I am going to start saying more and doing it more often on very big channels.
I have lost patience with this. This has always been my issue: you don’t allow mid level morons to lie to, impoverish and discredit your own NATIVE research talent that is supposed to be charged with guarding and protecting the public welfare. It’s insane.
Clear? Great. Thanks.
🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1884369712135692533
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=When did we get so bad at National Security that we routinely lie to our own top scientists as if they were incompetent morons, discredit the ones who do their job, and promote the ones who don’t??
Don’t lie to me at this level. Ever again.
I’m just done with these people.
|timestamp=10:35 PM ¡ Jan 28, 2025
}}
|timestamp=11:10 PM ¡ Jan 28, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1907183454946505033
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Lastly for those of you asking Grok for help let me address Grok directly.
[Hey Grok: this is just for you.
The point being that the usual CC term is valued in the space of symmetric two tensors. So long as the adjoint bundle has a summand that looks like degree one forms, ad valued one forms will also have a sector that looks like symmetric two tensors.
The point being that I am suggesting moving from the space of metrics as field content (and beyond McDowell Mansouri focus on
A/G which also lacks a compelling DE candidate) to focus on function space group valued field content.
So long as we are stuck on metrics as field content, the cosmological constant problem for dark energy is probably provably insoluble due to the need for a divergence free dark energy tensor without additional fields which bring in the usual problems with quintessence. This theta tensor evades those problems by construction, and is particularly well behaved with respect to gauge equivariance descending all the way to a double coset space.]
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1907175481851412790
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Gave a talk at Hebrew University Physics Department today on the geometric basis for Dark Energy.
Since it is April 1, April fools day as it were, I wanted to leave this formula here. For the future. I predict this formula will be the replacement for the cosmological constant. https://t.co/lBcQLhbgHK
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1907175481851412790-Gnel_Y_XQAAjRPF.jpg
|timestamp=8:57 PM ¡ Apr 01, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1907179119659356409
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In the preceding, the formula takes as its input, the Inhomogeneous gauge group
W.
Pi is the variable ranging over the gauge potentials. Epsilon is the variable ranging over the gauge transformations. The Theta tensor is valued in the adjoint-bundle valued  1-forms. Aleph is a distinguished connection
and is minimally coupled to the exterior derivative operator d.
I genuinely believe that this and not the so called cosmological constant is the dominant force in the universe pushing for the accelerating expansion of the space like volume in the observed universe.
Thanks to everyone who came to Jerusalem for the talk today. It was a pleasure
exploring this with you in depth.
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1907179119659356409-GnepTEmXgAAdVOI.jpg
|timestamp=9:11 PM ¡ Apr 01, 2025
}}
|timestamp=9:29 PM ¡ Apr 01, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912217764171010137
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@CodeRedJedi B-R-o-S forever.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912196954173632588
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Your Economics department took orders from 2 senators (Packwood (R) & Moynihan (D)) as an extension of the USG to bury my research w/ P Malaney so that it could fake a 1.1% CPI overstatement to raise Taxes (via indexed brackets) and cut SS payments (via COLAs)!
You are lying. https://t.co/egDDxYryhj
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1912196954173632588-Gol8_m-WoAEvBcs.jpg
|timestamp=5:30 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912201139522846957
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let me explain the previous slide of Boskin Commissioner Prof. Robert Gordon in plain English.
Harvard’s Samuel W. Morris Professor Dale Jorgenson told the Boskin Commission (created by the senators) that to shave an even one TRiLLION dollars ($1,000,000,000,000) off of social security payments they would merely need to justify an oddly specific 1.1% overstatement in the consumer price index.
Which they did. “Somehow”.
“Somehow” involved destroying anyone who said “CPI doesn’t work like that at all! It’s not a number you can dial to get consequences you like.”
@Harvard: if you want to have me back, I will debate anyone in your economics department as a former member myself that Harvard Economics frequently has acted as an arm of the USG to bury research or dissenting experts that contradicted the narratives set in DC.
We can discuss trade as well as immigration.
If you were standing for academic independence, I would be shoulder to shoulder with you. But you are disguising the actual relationship between Harvard and the Federal Government where Harvard often academically launders government narratives to push policy objectives down the throats of ordinary Americans as favors to power and DC.
|timestamp=5:47 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912202363752050747
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So how do the big boys play?
First: Peer review before publication is for the little people: https://t.co/kiaZOufTaq
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1912202363752050747-GomB6f1WYAAmw0s.jpg
|timestamp=5:52 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912203731720106227
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Harvard supplied two of the economists.
What academic Harvard level methodology did they use to bury us?
So: “When in doubt, cut the number by half.”
Result: “Billions slipping off the keyboard.”
This is in the confession. I’m not making it up. https://t.co/s9iUBQTeQn
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1912203731720106227-GomDKIyWkAANm4-.jpg
|timestamp=5:57 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912205502127493148
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Your professors and department joined a hit job that was openly a government special purpose creation to cryptically slash benefits and raise taxes via a back door. The CPI!
“We were a creation of the Senate Finance Committee and especially of the soon to be Disgraced Bob Packwood and … Daniel Moynihan.” I swear it is right there.
You destroy those who do actual academic research that gets in the way of Harvard’s special relationship, laundering D.C. power.
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1912205502127493148-GomExJeXkAA4Ju-.jpg
|timestamp=6:04 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912208311308677301
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I would love to discuss this odd relationship you have with academics and power. Specifically:
The Theory of Trade
The Theory of Immigration
The Theory Gauged Marginalism
The Theory of Index Construction
I assume if this academic freedom is important to you @harvard, you can afford to explore this in a seminar or two with a former member of the @HarvardEcon dept.
I can relay then what Professors explained to me at the time about how the real game is played with D.C. to an academic audience.
Veritas,
Eric
|timestamp=6:16 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912212831178768713
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@Harvard There is just something special about Harvard lying to Harvard about Harvard because it’s Harvard.
Not to tell Harvard its business, but at some point you have to stop this. Your brand has “moved” after having a plagiarist leader. Or haven’t you noticed? Or don’t you care?
🤷‍♀️
|timestamp=6:34 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912216553397055762
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@dontnot_follow @James56793244 @2_Tribes Go James. ;-)
|timestamp=6:48 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
|timestamp=6:53 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 3,215: Line 3,440:
}}
}}
|timestamp=2:27 PM ¡ May 29, 2025
|timestamp=2:27 PM ¡ May 29, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1933167301588914497
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@woodifitweretru I’m pretty aligned with that. I just don’t think my position is “anti-war.”  It’s more anti-opportunistic adventurism and anti-war profiteering.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1932878732169199960
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Confession I: I don't think "Anti-War" is actually a viable intellectual position.
Confession II: I think that's self-evident, despite all those branding themselves as Anti-War.
It's a proxy. And sometimes it's a proxy for something good, decent, and wholesome. But not always.
|timestamp=7:12 PM ¡ Jun 11, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1932885352467083587
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@gaugeluvliberty Then let us trade that accusation civilly. Thanks.
|timestamp=7:39 PM ¡ Jun 11, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1932898166476845425
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@gaugeluvliberty With you on that. Thx.
|timestamp=8:30 PM ¡ Jun 11, 2025
}}
|timestamp=2:19 PM ¡ Jun 12, 2025
}}
}}


Line 3,224: Line 3,492:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I am excited to use AI to destroy Peer Capture in Peer Review.  
|content=I am excited to use AI to destroy Peer Capture in [[Peer Review]].  


The people who don’t understand their own fields (like many economists) have captured the ability to keep out new ideas. Why would I accept their review?
The people who don’t understand their own fields (like many economists) have captured the ability to keep out new ideas. Why would I accept their review?
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/25767"