Jump to content

Gauge Theory: Difference between revisions

Gauge Theory (edit)

Revision as of 00:45, 12 February 2026

24,925 bytes added ,  Thursday at 00:45
→‎2009
No edit summary
Line 421: Line 421:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Just back from the future. Thanks to Seed magazine for breaking the story of [[Gauge Theory in Economics]] in 2011! (I kid, I kid)
|content=Just back from the future. Thanks to Seed magazine for breaking the story of [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Gauge Theory in Economics]] in 2011! (I kid, I kid)
|timestamp=1:52 PM · Nov 06, 2009
|timestamp=1:52 PM · Nov 06, 2009
}}
}}
Line 437: Line 437:




{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5574222109
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=CLAIM: I could teach a 7YO why intertemporal economic welfare is based on [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] so she could explain Dale Jorgenson's error.
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 464: Line 472:
|timestamp=12:14 AM · Nov 10, 2009
|timestamp=12:14 AM · Nov 10, 2009
}}
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5574222109
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=CLAIM: I could teach a 7YO why intertemporal economic welfare is based on [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] so she could explain Dale Jorgenson's error.
|timestamp=12:28 AM · Nov 10, 2009
|timestamp=12:28 AM · Nov 10, 2009
}}
}}
Line 484: Line 483:
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Lee Smolin: Eric Weinstein and Pia Malaney say Economics is a [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]].</br>
|content=Lee Smolin: Eric Weinstein and Pia Malaney say Economics is a [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]].</br>
Economist Y: Lee Smolin says Economics is a gauge theory.
Economist Y: Lee Smolin says Economics is a [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]].
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 540: Line 539:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Gauge Theory|Gauge theoretic economics]] interest has come recently from @mathpunk @dabacon @diffeomacx @riemanmzeta @tylercowen @ahaspel etc... Loving it.
|content=[[Gauge Theory of Economics|Gauge theoretic economics]] interest has come recently from @mathpunk @dabacon @diffeomacx @riemanmzeta @tylercowen @ahaspel etc... Loving it.
|timestamp=3:02 AM · Dec 21, 2009
|timestamp=3:02 AM · Dec 21, 2009
}}
}}
Line 551: Line 550:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I should say that [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theoretic economics]] is also all about academic freedom, quashed as it was by the rennegade Boskin Commission idiocy.
|content=I should say that [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Gauge theoretic economics]] is also all about academic freedom, quashed as it was by the rennegade Boskin Commission idiocy.
|timestamp=3:11 AM · Dec 21, 2009
|timestamp=3:11 AM · Dec 21, 2009
}}
}}
Line 562: Line 561:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=.@riemannzeta: Samuelson's economics is to Newtonian physics what [[Gauge Theory|gauge theoretic economics]] is to Einstein/Yang-Mills http://bit.ly/PSINAE
|content=.@riemannzeta: Samuelson's economics is to Newtonian physics what [[Gauge Theory of Economics|gauge theoretic economics]] is to Einstein/Yang-Mills http://bit.ly/PSINAE
|timestamp=4:27 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=4:27 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
=== 2010 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/8077009350
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Today @mathpunk scoops Nature/Econometrica on the story of economics as (selection-friendly) [[Gauge Theory]] at "Math for Primates" podcasts.
|timestamp=5:19 PM · Jan 22, 2010
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/19905265195
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The duo that failed to bury Denison, was allowed to bury [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Gauge Theoretic Economics]]. What changed? New intolerance of academic self-defense.
|timestamp=12:15 PM · Jul 30, 2010
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/20272625428
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=How crazy is [[Gauge Theory of Economics|economic gauge theory]]? [[Paul Samuelson]] liked it because he was looking for it in 1950(!): http://bit.ly/c6vILI (e.g. see fig 4).
|timestamp=2:58 AM · Aug 04, 2010
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2110185527050240
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The marvelous @GrahamFarmelo points laymen to http://bit.ly/130Ekw for a [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] intro. But is it easy on newbies? Try it. I guess not.
|timestamp=9:28 PM · Nov 09, 2010
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2110719591976960
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Diff Calculus: Rise above global reference level / Run</br>
[[Gauge Theory|Gauge Thy]]: Rise above endogenous reference level / Run</br>
<nowiki>#</nowiki>GaugeTheoryIn1TweetAttempt.
|timestamp=9:30 PM · Nov 09, 2010
}}
=== 2012 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/190161990034014208
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Headed to INET Berlin conference to talk [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] and evolutionary biology with macro economists. #INETBerlin #whatcouldpossiblygowrong
|timestamp=7:38 PM · Apr 11, 2012
}}
=== 2013 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/293141226033643520
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A new book "The Physics of Wall Street" devotes its last chapter &amp; much of the epilogue to our [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory of markets]]! http://t.co/CKFe16f5
|timestamp=11:41 PM · Jan 20, 2013
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/300244764777930752
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=White Hat Science v Black Hat Economics: Prof @edfrenkel brings the fight over our [[Gauge Theory of Economics|gauge theory of economics]] to @Slate! http://t.co/Bz42Ms2h
|timestamp=2:08 PM · Feb 09, 2013
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/301589309625090048
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Naughty Math Games?? The USA Today headline calls our [[Gauge Theory|gauge theoretic]] [[CPI]] an evil trick to be used for good. http://t.co/kxZ8CXok
|timestamp=7:11 AM · Feb 13, 2013
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/303659906324656128
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Quora asked for a brief intuitive explanation of [[Gauge Theory of Economics|gauge theory in economics]]. That's tough! Tell me what you think. http://t.co/vGO6yzC6
|timestamp=12:18 AM · Feb 19, 2013
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/340079650892021760
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Gauge Theory|Gauge Thy of Tastes]] will be on tap at the conference on Math for New Economics of @FieldsInstitute and @INETeconomics http://t.co/0t8ztEwWzQ
|timestamp=12:18 PM · May 30, 2013
}}
=== 2014 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/481162040212336641
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=George Soros' reflexivity as [[Gauge Theory]] via MC Escher? @INETeconomics interviews me on some pretty tough stuff: https://t.co/A14UIknTKe
|timestamp=7:49 PM · Jun 23, 2014
}}
=== 2016 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/768830569585094658
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content="[[Gauge Theory]]" is a modern backwards compatible differential calculus done right, yet made so obscure that only physics &amp; geometry upgraded.
|timestamp=3:21 PM · Aug 25, 2016
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/768831773279084544
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Here is a career in mathematics we *need* someone to do: find every client field using differential calculus &amp; upgrade them to [[Gauge Theory]].
|timestamp=3:25 PM · Aug 25, 2016
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/768867431078961152
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In 1 tweet?? Ok! [[Gauge Theory|Gauge Thy]] is diff. calc. w/ Rise in Rise/Run measured against a reference level that's *endogenous* https://t.co/ymO7bPVfwT
|timestamp=5:47 PM · Aug 25, 2016
}}
=== 2017 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/829418026185297920
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Pia Malaney's discovery of [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Gauge Theoretic Economics]] has spent 20 years being rediscovered after [[Harvard]] buried it:
https://t.co/UHqwwyBw1W
|timestamp=7:54 PM · Feb 08, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/834269582495928322
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=No economist impressed me one-on-one more than [[Ken Arrow]]. He was so generous with his genius helping us with [[Gauge Theory of Economics|gauge theoretic economics]]. #rip https://t.co/oeRZ6KWOy4
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/834274130207744000
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@stogachess Sshhhhhh! But yes.
|timestamp=5:30 AM · Feb 22, 2017
}}
|timestamp=5:12 AM · Feb 22, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/885756160409718784
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The mother of [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Econ. gauge thy]] at @INETeconomics, is finally(!) on Twitter as @PiaMalaney, &amp; visiting @RubinReport to talk Econ.
Follow her! https://t.co/Db53jqQn4M
|timestamp=7:01 AM · Jul 14, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/897898143290806272
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=My Co-Founder of [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Gauge Theoretic Economics]] on sex differences &amp; how to empower brilliant women in technical fields:
https://t.co/rwj6l8l4O9
|timestamp=7:09 PM · Aug 16, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/922509530839244800
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ended @INETeconomics #INET2017 touring Edinburgh, home of both [[Gauge Theory]] &amp; Economics, w @piamalaney, mother of [[Gauge Theory of Economics|Economic Gauge Theory]] FTW! https://t.co/zmrlkri8Nd
|media1=EricRWeinstein-X-post-922509530839244800-DM1phd8XUAExBQI.jpg
|media2=EricRWeinstein-X-post-922509530839244800-DM1phd4WkAEksIz.jpg
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Oct 23, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928300831652298753
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@StretchMcLurch I would reserve '[[Gauge Theory|gauge group]]' for the infinite dimensional group of automorphisms of the vector bundle and 'structure group' for the (usually) finite-dimensional structure preserving symmetry group of the individual fibers ( e.g. SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) of the Standard Model).
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928305170764652545
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@edsonedge "Physics and Geometry"
|timestamp=4:56 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928309737069821952
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@edsonedge I don’t think the thrust of the paper or lecture is anywhere near in importance. It would point you fruitlessly elsewhere.
|timestamp=5:14 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928316410303877120
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1/ Interesting esoteric features:
i) refers to Einstein Field Equation for the gravitational force. (only implicitly).
ii) refers to the Yang-Mills-Maxwell Equation for the other forces (only implicitly).
iii) refers to the Dirac Equation for matter (yet again, only implicitly).
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928317163491835904
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=2/ The Quantum (e.g. quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, quantum measurement, etc...) is relegated to a *secondary* status below the key geometric insights. This was likely done very subtly when the paper was given in the 1980s, as it was, and remains, a revolutionary idea.
|timestamp=5:43 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928318499197353984
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=End/ An interpretation is that Witten, the greatest living mathematical physicist, was indicating to us that it was only these *abstractions* that were likely to survive, while the instantiations (i.e. the exact equations we still use) would likely perish.
A msg never recieived.
|timestamp=5:49 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928326950778650624
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@BadgerPundit Mine is the most hopeful potential escape from yours.
|timestamp=6:22 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
|timestamp=4:38 PM · Nov 08, 2017
}}
=== 2018 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980669687313850368
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1/ APRIL FOOLS' SCIENCE: Theory into Practice.
I was challenged by someone as to why I wasn't taking my own medicine referenced in the sub-tweet below this April 1st.  Ok. Here goes.
What I believe about the universe that is quite different and why I don't talk about it much... https://t.co/RjqRGc5J9m
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980671434153275393
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=2/ When I was around 16-17, I learned of a story that fascinated me much more than it seemed to captivate any other mathematician or physicist. It was the story of the discovery of the "Wu-Yang" dictionary around 1975-6, involving 3 super-minds: Jim Simons, CN Yang &amp; Is Singer.
|timestamp=5:01 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980673146398244865
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=3/ What was learned was that the Quantum of Planck, Bohr
&amp; Dirac was built on an internal Geometry, just as surely as General Relativity was built on an external geometry of space-time. Only the two geometries weren't the same! One was due to B Riemann; the other to C Ehresmann.
|timestamp=5:07 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980674834215481344
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=4/ Further the 2 geometries had different advantages. Riemann's geometry allowed you to compress the curvature &amp; measure the 'torsion' while Ehresmann's encouraged "[[Gauge Theory|Gauge Rotation]]"... as long as you didn't do either of those two things. So I asked could the geometries be unified?
|timestamp=5:14 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980677084094783489
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=5/ This would be a change in physics' main question. Instead of asking if Einstein's gravity could fit within Bohr's quantum, we could ask "Could Einstein's structures peculiar to Riemann's geometry be unified &amp; rotated within Ehresmann's?" The answer was almost a 'No!'
Almost.
|timestamp=5:23 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980680721353199618
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=6/ While physicists said the Universe was known to be chiral, I came to believe it was fundamentally symmetric. While we seemed to observe there being 3 or more generations of matter, I came to believe that there were but 2 true generations, plus an improbable "imposter." etc...
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980682507107602432
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=7/ In short a great many things had to be slightly off in our picture of the world in the 1980s to get the two geometric theories into a "Geometric Unity." Then in 1998, it was found that neutrinos weren't massless! This started to tip the scales towards the alterations I needed.
|timestamp=5:45 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980683552487440384
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=8/ In short the April 1st "trick" that is being played on me is that I see a *natural* theory where chirality would be emergent (not fundamental), the number of true generations would be 2 not 3, there would be 2^4 and not 15 Fermions in a generation, and the geometries unify.
|timestamp=5:49 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980686736375164928
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=9/ I spoke on this nearly 5 years ago; I have been slow to get back to it as I found the physics response bewildering. I have now decided to return to this work &amp; to disposition it. So over the coming year, I'll begin pushing out "Geometric Unity" (as a non-physicist) to experts. https://t.co/ICSXdNs9D2
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-980686736375164928-DZwWjUgUMAAcOnr.jpg
|timestamp=6:01 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/980687868648566784
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=END/ I am sorry that this was a bit technical for lay folks and not technical enough for experts, but it's twitter. I may begin to say more in the weeks and months ahead that may be clarifying.
If you are interested, do stay tuned. Until then, I thank you for your time.
|timestamp=6:06 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
|timestamp=4:54 AM · Apr 02, 2018
}}
=== 2019 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109208423072063488
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Interesting to see who paints @joerogan as dumb. His charlatans &amp; dullards include me. Fair. But other losers include Sir Roger Penrose, @seanmcarroll, @HeatherEHeying, @BretWeinstein, @SamHarrisOrg, @sapinker, @DrDebraSoh.
So tell us: which podcasts have  the smart good people?
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109500512855035904
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Ha! That’s not it all Kara.
But you bring up an interesting point. Most all of the amazing people I know “can’t stand the heat” (deliberate attacks, threats against family and smearing of their reputation) so they “get out of the kitchen” (retreat from public life and service).
|timestamp=5:01 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109503676001849345
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh What we‘re left with is those who thrive in the heat. This is pure adverse selection with the extremophiles who prefer more heat than light deciding that the public sphere is theirs alone. Well..screw that. I don’t enjoy my stalkers and these hit pieces paint bullseyes with hate.
|timestamp=5:14 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109507238161309697
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Okay. I’ll do as you suggest. Hang on...
|timestamp=5:28 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109510459516813312
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Okay. I re-read it. Here is my take:
A) The piece on its own is not the issue. It’s part of a growing literature that lives to paint heterodox dissenting center-Left voices as dreaded gateways to the ‘alt-right’.
B) You’re right about ‘dullard’. It’s annoying ... but so what.
|timestamp=5:41 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109510912082235395
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@thekidz2r @karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Can we not do this here right now? Kara is engaging and I’m appreciating that. Thanks. 🙏
|timestamp=5:43 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109512695806517248
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh C) Because the piece is “no different” than a million other MSM articles, it seeks to create a perception of truth by perseveration. That is, I introduced the IDW, so I know what it is &amp; there isn’t a real Trump supporter in it. Yet our echo chamber repeats it into ‘truth’. Why?
|timestamp=5:50 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109513399568728065
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @thekidz2r @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Thanks. Since you don’t follow me I can’t contact you without going through our mutual friends. May I ask you to DM me your email or mobile? I’ll be happy to send you mine.
|timestamp=5:53 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109515155119857665
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh D) There are a lot of proximity attacks. Alex Jones belongs in one of Joe’s buckets of guests. But Roger Penrose is in a *totally* different bucket. As was Tulsi Gabbard. Or Bari Weiss. I mean the whole 🌎 goes through that studio yet the MSM fixates on “OMG! He Talked to Milo!!”
|timestamp=6:00 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109520268093849600
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @brianmcarney @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Agree w/ you both. I actually want some Overton window. But if I can’t even discuss the *reasonable* reasons on MSM why 1/2 the US is so pissed off that it sent a wild “can you hear me now” message in 2016, we’re going to get another larger middle finger in 2020. We need to talk.
|timestamp=6:20 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1109522172999946240
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh E) Lastly, as Joe’s guest, I get to discuss paying women more for kin work, North Indian classical music, sexual mimicry in cephalopods, [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]], cross-harp blues harmonica &amp; a world of topics no one gets to touch!
Kara I reread. Can you watch this: https://t.co/D5YdHy0ddP?
|timestamp=6:27 PM · Mar 23, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1110147627297828864
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Kara? Any reaction?
|timestamp=11:53 AM · Mar 25, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1113533636995731456
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@jerrylieb12 @karaswisher @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Nah. Not a cop out. I’m a fan of coffee first. I’m not out to fight Kara for anyone’s amusement. I want to figure out if we even disagree first, and if so, on what issues. I have no need to nurse my grounds for a grudge with anyone.
Thanks Kara. Hope you’ve been well.
|timestamp=8:08 PM · Apr 03, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1113661000186601475
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karaswisher @jerrylieb12 @joerogan @seanmcarroll @HeatherEHeying @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @sapinker @DrDebraSoh Looking forward to it.
|timestamp=4:34 AM · Apr 04, 2019
}}
|timestamp=9:41 PM · Mar 22, 2019
}}
}}


Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/25756"