UAP: Difference between revisions

|content=@DasWoolf I was not expecting to speak. The guest of honor, Lue Elizondo, became unavailable at the last minute. I was asked to step in. As a courtesy I agreed, and shared some ideas that represent no one but myself as a private US citizen working with publicly available info. Specifics?

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584515630987763713

|content=@andyinberlin I am not as sure as you are that this what is going on. It’s a matryoshka problem. I’m convinced that many people you think of as insiders are not really inside enough. The UAP/UFO community leaps to MANY conclusions as if this is fun. This is not fun if you are serious about it.

|timestamp=12:02 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584516670512504832

|content=@ALean_Skye I don’t think people understand disclosure properly. Consider layers:

A) The basic *claimed* phenomena.</br>

B) Associate phenomena.</br>

C) Cover up of the above.</br>

D) People in the know living a lie.</br>

F) Outsiders being forced to live lies.

|timestamp=12:06 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584517440205033472

|content=@ALean_Skye Disclosure likely has to do with F) as much as anything. No matter what A) Turns out to be. Which I still don’t really know. If you are fighting for disclosure, don’t over focus on whether we are prepared for A).

 

I’m not inflating my level of knowledge here. I still don’t know.

|timestamp=12:09 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584517907836329984

|content=@andyinberlin I see a lot of people struggling under a heavy weight. People take their NDAs very seriously.

|timestamp=12:11 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584518630129078272

|content=@dkb003 Official panels tend to be tightly controlled in advance through use of insiders. Occasionally that screws up and you get a Jeff Sachs (Lancet) or a Richard Feynman/Gen Kutyna (Challenger). Galileo Project is an outsider project. Prefer the latter.

|timestamp=12:14 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584519621931331584

|content=@DasWoolf Technology is the entry point *if* recovered craft are real. I’ve seen no such proof. None.

But it is *psychotic* not to have Particle Theorists, General Relativists and Differential Geometers all over our US effort. I have yet to meet one in two years. Makes me very suspicious.

|timestamp=12:18 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584520802656870401

|content=@DasWoolf One thought is that it is very hard to make up ghost stories about how Alcubierre Drives, Wormholes, Time Dilation, etc REALISTICALLY account for this with actual specialists.  

I mean, I get it. But it’s nonsense. This is not about tech. It’s about post-GR/SM physics or a psyop.

|timestamp=12:22 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584521029879070721

|content=@DasWoolf It could sorta kinda maybe be a cover story for advanced tech. But I can’t get that to make sense yet. Maybe my failure of imagination.

|timestamp=12:23 PM · Oct 24, 2022

|content=@nickpopemod I say exactly the same. But, to be fair, the skeptics can point to zero incontrovertible evidence (at least so far as I am aware)…Which is a big deal in my book. The soft evidence is not in their favor. The absence of hard evidence *available to citizens &amp; scientists* is. 🤷‍♀️

|content=@Methedra And often forced to speak as if one voice. Don’t forget that part.

|content=@CarpathianMts Happy to NEVER mention UFO/UAP ever again and work quietly. Totally up to what the interested community wants. I hate this topic. I just think it is clear that it appears to be critically  important. Even if it is a USG headfake.