Jump to content

UAP: Difference between revisions

UAP (edit)

Revision as of 06:42, 21 January 2026

2,712 bytes added ,  21 January
→‎2022
Line 2,911: Line 2,911:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest I had to admit that there is an unbelievable amount of indirect evidence that something is going on with not much direct evidence.
|content=I had to admit that there is an unbelievable amount of indirect evidence that something is going on with not much direct evidence.


That’s pretty weird. But pretending that this is either debunked or real misses the point. And I can’t keep having this nonprogressing interaction.
That’s pretty weird. But pretending that this is either debunked or real misses the point. And I can’t keep having this nonprogressing interaction.
Line 2,924: Line 2,924:


All of this lawyerly “observations that currently cannot be completely explained” soft language in the absence of hard data is pretty confusing.
All of this lawyerly “observations that currently cannot be completely explained” soft language in the absence of hard data is pretty confusing.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Dr_ThomasZ-profile-pxjifHQ.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Dr_ThomasZ/status/1534906666424090627
|name=Thomas Zurbuchen
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Dr_ThomasZ
|username=Dr_ThomasZ
|content=NASA is commissioning a study team to start early fall to examine unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) - observations in the sky that cannot be identified. This team will focus on identifying and collecting available data to scientifically understand UAPs. https://go.nasa.gov/396cSCi
|media1=Dr_ThomasZ-X-post-1534906666424090627-FU0VeqBXoAA73Oh.jpg
|timestamp=2:34 PM · Jun 9, 2022
}}
|timestamp=3:27 PM · Jun 9, 2022
|timestamp=3:27 PM · Jun 9, 2022
}}
}}
Line 2,978: Line 2,989:
But it is definitely time to end the soft language. It’s big.
But it is definitely time to end the soft language. It’s big.
|timestamp=3:27 PM · Jun 9, 2022
|timestamp=3:27 PM · Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=MickWest-profile-YwDcskvI.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/MickWest/status/1535042473877045249
|name=Mick West
|usernameurl=https://x.com/MickWest
|username=MickWest
|content=BS. There's no "portion" of the government that's saying that. A few politicians have vaguely characterized the UAP topic in a variety of ways that suggest non-human-technology as a possibility.
But the narrative that "the government" has admitted non-human interlopers is false
|timestamp=11:33 PM · Jun 9, 2022
}}
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 2,985: Line 3,007:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Mick, no offense, but at this point you are just wrong. There are factions within government, ex-government and government contracting, and some of them are saying that. Enough.  
|content=Mick, no offense, but at this point you are just wrong. There are factions within government, ex-government and government contracting, and some of them are saying that. Enough.  


Or as you say: BS. Sorry.
Or as you say: BS. Sorry.
|timestamp=11:51 PM · Jun 9, 2022
|timestamp=11:51 PM · Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=MickWest-profile-YwDcskvI.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/MickWest/status/1535042473877045249
|name=Mick West
|usernameurl=https://x.com/MickWest
|username=MickWest
|content=Wrong based on what exactly? Who is telling you this? What did they tell you?
Or do you think Mellon and Elizondo constitute a "faction within government?"
|timestamp=12:12 PM · Jun 9, 2022
}}
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 2,996: Line 3,029:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Mick, don’t take this the wrong way. But you are highly motivated and stigmatizing. When you ask “who?” you are playing dumb. I have agreed with you that the videos aren’t compelling. But you don’t quit.
|content=Mick, don’t take this the wrong way. But you are highly motivated and stigmatizing. When you ask “who?” you are playing dumb. I have agreed with you that the videos aren’t compelling. But you don’t quit.


So either play the debunker or don’t. But this isn’t 2 guys and 3 videos.
So either play the debunker or don’t. But this isn’t 2 guys and 3 videos.
Line 3,007: Line 3,040:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Obviously a lot of serious people are scared about reputational attacks. But this isn’t in range of just debunking a few videos anymore. Something is going on. We just can’t know with confidence if it is real deception or real phenomena until real data is released.  Clear?
|content=Obviously a lot of serious people are scared about reputational attacks. But this isn’t in range of just debunking a few videos anymore. Something is going on. We just can’t know with confidence if it is real deception or real phenomena until real data is released.  Clear?
|timestamp=1:48 AM · Jun 10, 2022
|timestamp=1:48 AM · Jun 10, 2022
}}
}}
Line 3,016: Line 3,049:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest I’m getting fatigued. I don’t talk much about the Tic Tac. Or the Zimbabwe kids. Or Lue. Or Remote Viewing. Clear?
|content=I’m getting fatigued. I don’t talk much about the Tic Tac. Or the Zimbabwe kids. Or Lue. Or Remote Viewing. Clear?


There are an enormous number of IC and DOD related folks who want to know what we are seeing. And this “Debunking” grainy videos feels petty. It’s not the videos.
There are an enormous number of IC and DOD related folks who want to know what we are seeing. And this “Debunking” grainy videos feels petty. It’s not the videos.
Line 3,044: Line 3,077:


cc: @GalileoProject1, @DrBrianKeating #UFOTwitter
cc: @GalileoProject1, @DrBrianKeating #UFOTwitter
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=GalileoProject1-profile-s6j06O1f.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/GalileoProject1/status/1537865909829779458
|name=Galileo Project
|usernameurl=https://x.com/GalileoProject1
|username=GalileoProject1
|content=Professor Avi Loeb will join @EricRWeinstein for a live chat on @DrBrianKeating’s @Into_Impossible Youtube channel today:
{{#widget:YouTube|id=fdwuhU_zu8Y}}
#galileoproject #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #science
|timestamp=6:32 PM · Jun 17, 2022
}}
|timestamp=7:59 PM · Jun 17, 2022
|timestamp=7:59 PM · Jun 17, 2022
}}
}}
Line 3,093: Line 3,140:


I have seen none of it. Zero. If I had signed away my right to disclose, I could not say this.
I have seen none of it. Zero. If I had signed away my right to disclose, I could not say this.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=davenewworld_2-profile-0Y4x-GQR.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/davenewworld_2/status/1568943257760964611
|name=Fifty Shades of Whey
|usernameurl=https://x.com/davenewworld_2
|username=davenewworld_2
|content=The U.S. Navy denies a FOIA request to release more UFO videos because it would allegedly "harm national security" and "no portions of the videos" can be released.
|media1=davenewworld_2-X-post-1568943257760964611-FcYBk4YX0AArHeC.jpg
|timestamp=12:43 PM · Sep 11, 2022
}}
|timestamp=5:10 PM · Sep 12, 2022
|timestamp=5:10 PM · Sep 12, 2022
}}
}}
Line 3,396: Line 3,454:


How may I help?
How may I help?
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=davofromthetron-profile-yKnt1e5X.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/davofromthetron/status/1584486686859218950
|name=davofromthetron
|usernameurl=https://x.com/davofromthetron
|username=davofromthetron
|content=San Marino update's what we really want, baby.
|timestamp=10:07 AM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
|timestamp=11:50 AM · Oct 24, 2022
|timestamp=11:50 AM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
}}
Line 4,081: Line 4,149:
|timestamp=8:08 PM · Oct 31, 2022
|timestamp=8:08 PM · Oct 31, 2022
}}
}}


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/25575"