6,873
edits
Morals: Difference between revisions
→2009
(→2021) |
(→2009) |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
=== 2009 === | === 2009 === | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5648592838 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=No doubt, my points about K-meson decay and Hayflick limits in toxicology were also contaminated by my trying to make econ. a science? ;-) | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642230131 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=New Topic: Scientific Malware, Theory-Phobia, and the Proxy Economy of Science. | |||
|timestamp=5:49 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642371977 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Let me make a [[Claims|claim]]: Science is too disruptive to result in an orderly market place of ideas. If you like orderly markets, ya got trouble. | |||
|timestamp=5:58 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642463955 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=What we have built is a compromise: a proxy economy which is nothing if not orderly. In fact, the proxy economy is a towering achievment. | |||
|timestamp=6:03 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642635320 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The proxy economy gets results but in a weird way. A falsifiable hypothesis sent to a leading journal can be returned as 'speculation'. | |||
|timestamp=6:13 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642744662 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The vulnerability of the proxy economy is that achieves an orderly market place of ideas at the expense of efficiency. Enter "Theory". | |||
|timestamp=6:20 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643070858 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=There are *distinct* fears surrounding new theory. A) It is crap. B) If not, It threatens stabilty, my grant, my oeuvre, my self-worth. | |||
|timestamp=6:42 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643167121 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=A game is to make lay people interested in radical progress fear disorderly change as if they were rentseekers, by feeding the fear of crap. | |||
|timestamp=6:48 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643361621 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The crap, though, is easy to spot. String triumphalism, genetic determinism, etc.. Yet so is an advancement like gauge theoretic economics. | |||
|timestamp=7:02 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643613608 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=So, in my case, while *experiment* shows consumer tastes changing, we claim any theory incorporating this is crap. Now, that's some malware! | |||
|timestamp=7:20 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643801627 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=In particle physics, wagers (more than data) have showed us how weak actual conviction in theory is relative to stated confidence. | |||
|timestamp=7:34 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
| Line 106: | Line 204: | ||
|content=[[Morals|Moral]]: Bad Theory is overblown. Good theory is a remaining threat to orderly science. But if you fear disruption, run the malware. Thx. | |content=[[Morals|Moral]]: Bad Theory is overblown. Good theory is a remaining threat to orderly science. But if you fear disruption, run the malware. Thx. | ||
|timestamp=7:44 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |timestamp=7:44 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | ||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5647987525 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=So @orzelc claims I'm making a mistake fallling for economics as a science. Yeah. I thought we were apes with behavior to study. My bad. | |||
|timestamp=12:46 PM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=1:18 PM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | }} | ||