6,465
edits
The Golden Age of General Relativity: Difference between revisions
The Golden Age of General Relativity (edit)
Revision as of 06:03, 15 December 2025
, 15 December 2025→2025
(→2022) |
(→2025) |
||
| Line 615: | Line 615: | ||
=== 2025 === | === 2025 === | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1926676426452771153 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=@TheScottzilla No offense taken. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
| Line 627: | Line 634: | ||
The founding of Molecular Biology: 1953</br> | The founding of Molecular Biology: 1953</br> | ||
Teller-Ulam H-Bomb Design: 1952</br> | Teller-Ulam H-Bomb Design: 1952</br> | ||
Golden Age of General Relativity: 1953-75</br> | |||
World Wide Web: 1989</br> | World Wide Web: 1989</br> | ||
Axial Tomography for CT scans: 1960</br> | Axial Tomography for CT scans: 1960</br> | ||
| Line 646: | Line 653: | ||
Do the research. You will find the same. | Do the research. You will find the same. | ||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=eigenrobot-profile-YWD1qX3H.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/eigenrobot/status/1926466752923173244 | |||
|name=eigenrobot | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/eigenrobot | |||
|username=eigenrobot | |||
|content=physicists your field has failed. | |||
you haven't done shit for us in the last 75 years. you're superannuated. just resting on your laurels | |||
|timestamp=2:34 AM · May 25, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=4:06 PM · May 25, 2025 | |timestamp=4:06 PM · May 25, 2025 | ||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1926674330336772455 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=@TheScottzilla Enjoy your lifesaving CT scan which we are discussing over the World Wide Web. | |||
|timestamp=4:18 PM · May 25, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=4:27 PM · May 25, 2025 | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 701: | Line 731: | ||
|content=Imho, This @nypost article is **NOT** the big story. That is coming. | |content=Imho, This @nypost article is **NOT** the big story. That is coming. | ||
CLAIM: We will find that there is a minimum of *one* pair of fake/real programs and that it is much much bigger than the hazing ritual being reported. But, more importantly, there are likely many more such pairs of REAL/FAKE programs in this area. | [[Claims|CLAIM]]: We will find that there is a minimum of *one* pair of fake/real programs and that it is much much bigger than the hazing ritual being reported. But, more importantly, there are likely many more such pairs of REAL/FAKE programs in this area. | ||
Yes: we fake UFOs. And yes, there is a REAL Aerospace program that hides under cover of the FAKE UFO program. | Yes: we fake UFOs. And yes, there is a REAL Aerospace program that hides under cover of the FAKE UFO program. | ||
| Line 729: | Line 759: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=CLAIM: These FAKE and REAL programs will keep going and extend to [[General Relativity|"The Golden Age of General Relativity"]]. We will eventually learn that the mysterious philathropists Roger Babson and Agnew Bahnson who funded Louis Witten and Bryce deWitt (respectively), along with others were (obviously) NationalSecurity cutouts. They were real people giving cover to some major Post-Manhattan physics thing. | |content=[[Claims|CLAIM]]: These FAKE and REAL programs will keep going and extend to [[The Golden Age of General Relativity|"The Golden Age of General Relativity"]]. We will eventually learn that the mysterious philathropists Roger Babson and Agnew Bahnson who funded Louis Witten and Bryce deWitt (respectively), along with others were (obviously) NationalSecurity cutouts. They were real people giving cover to some major Post-Manhattan physics thing. | ||
From Australian Intelligence (circa 1971) we have this which I both believe and hypothesized LONG before finding it: | From Australian Intelligence (circa 1971) we have this which I both believe and hypothesized LONG before finding it: | ||
| Line 751: | Line 781: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Claim: We are going to learn that just as public work on chain reaction physics mysteriously vanished during the Manhattan Project, research in fundamental physics changed character TWICE. Once in the late 1960s-early 1970s with the [[Mansfield Amendment (1969)|Mansfield Amendment]], after the quark model and spontaneous symmetry breaking and then more dramatically around 1983-1984 shortly after the catastrophic disclosures of Howard Borland and John Aristotle Philips to handle the "Streisand Effect" problem, which had no such name at the time. | |content=[[Claims|Claim]]: We are going to learn that just as public work on chain reaction physics mysteriously vanished during the Manhattan Project, research in fundamental physics changed character TWICE. Once in the late 1960s-early 1970s with the [[Mansfield Amendment (1969)|Mansfield Amendment]], after the quark model and spontaneous symmetry breaking and then more dramatically around 1983-1984 shortly after the catastrophic disclosures of Howard Borland and John Aristotle Philips to handle the "Streisand Effect" problem, which had no such name at the time. | ||
Eventually we learned why progress immediately stalled in physics due to secrecy and the building of the atomic bombs. We have an obvious second candidate and we aren't allowed to ask questions about why we aren't getting back to real physics in open universities. The dangerous and powerful kind that can build prosperity, weapons, energy, travel, propulsion and insight. | Eventually we learned why progress immediately stalled in physics due to secrecy and the building of the atomic bombs. We have an obvious second candidate and we aren't allowed to ask questions about why we aren't getting back to real physics in open universities. The dangerous and powerful kind that can build prosperity, weapons, energy, travel, propulsion and insight. | ||