Jump to content

String Theory: Difference between revisions

Line 451: Line 451:
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=That said, I think she’s much harder to beat as she gains confidence in her ability to stand for science. It’s an impressive act of conscience & bravery to go it alone like this, and I wish the physics community saw it for what it is.  I may disagree at times, but my hat is off.
|content=That said, I think she’s much harder to beat as she gains confidence in her ability to stand for science. It’s an impressive act of conscience & bravery to go it alone like this, and I wish the physics community saw it for what it is.  I may disagree at times, but my hat is off.
|quote=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 459: Line 459:
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We oddly now live in a Hossenfelder era of Theoretical physics. Sabine is almost distinguished by a near total unwillingness/inability to sit quietly through the hype machines in Theoretical physics that feed the demands of lay people, journalists & physicists. But is she right?
|content=We oddly now live in a Hossenfelder era of Theoretical physics. Sabine is almost distinguished by a near total unwillingness/inability to sit quietly through the hype machines in Theoretical physics that feed the demands of lay people, journalists & physicists. But is she right?
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=skdh-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/skdh/status/1177459169168773121
|name=Sabine Hossenfelder
|usernameurl=https://x.com/skdh
|username=skdh
|content=In my new video, I explain why I am not a fan of the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
{{#widget:YouTube|id=kF6USB2I1iU}}
|timestamp=1:48 PM · Sep 27, 2019
}}
|timestamp=1:48 PM · Sep 27, 2019
|timestamp=1:48 PM · Sep 27, 2019
}}
}}
Line 469: Line 480:
|content=My take is that she is usually right. Not only that, many in the community rail against her when *they* know she is making sense.
|content=My take is that she is usually right. Not only that, many in the community rail against her when *they* know she is making sense.


But where she‘s wrong could be very significant. I would love to *try* to defend the role of beauty in physics (tarnished by string theory) from her.
But where she‘s wrong could be very significant. I would love to *try* to defend the role of beauty in physics (tarnished by [[String Theory|string theory]]) from her.
|timestamp=1:48 PM · Sep 27, 2019
|timestamp=1:48 PM · Sep 27, 2019
}}
}}