5,984
edits
I’ve Got a Good Feeling About This: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | |||
[[File:ERW-X-post-1986803710551290047-G5KLccDboAAWxiM.jpg|thumb]] | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803710551290047 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=And @grok, can you make this argument understandable to anyone claiming to be confused by this analogy? Thx partner. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803710551290047 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Here is what is wrong with [[Effective Field Theory (EFT)|Effective Field Theory]], to me, as explained by Wheel Of Fortune. | |||
Imagine this puzzle was the information at some low energy ([[Standard Model]]), and the number of letters left to find matched the orders of magnitude from where we are to (UV) completion. | |||
[[Effective Field Theory (EFT)|Effective Field Theory]] says “Be modest and learn to live with lack of unique UV completion and a rambling effective [[Standard Model]] so many orders of energy away from the Planck Scale because it can’t be guessed from so far away.” | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1986803710551290047-G5KLccDboAAWxiM.jpg | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=arivero-profile-VWOtSvhz.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/arivero/status/1986796150733640121 | |||
|name=Alejandro Rivero | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/arivero | |||
|username=arivero | |||
|content=@EricRWeinstein it could be interesting if you clarify your position on the [[Effective Field Theory (EFT)|EFT]] doctrine. To me it is basically a "planck-scale first" doctrine, that tells that any experimental result is not important, and than renormalizability of theories is just an amusement. | |||
|timestamp=2:01 PM · Nov 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=2:31 PM · Nov 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803714179633663 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=[[Theory of Geometric Unity|GU]] says: “That is eminently reasonable & sober, and is thus good solid science. Now get this defeatist mindset the hell away from me, go peer review each other, and hold my beer. Send lawyers, guns & money: let’s get back to American Cowboy science.” | |||
🤠 | |||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=QqIE2-FUpKg}} | |||
|timestamp=2:31 PM · Nov 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803710551290047 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=When it comes to Ed Witten/Lenny Susskind vs John F. Donoghue/[[Ken Wilson]], I’m just not in that game. Not my colleagues. Not my rodeo. | |||
I belong to the Bruce Willis school of fundamental physics: | |||
“I was always kinda partial to Roy Rodgers actually.” | |||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=BSRrzrQtmto}} | |||
|timestamp=2:41 PM · Nov 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=2:54 PM · Nov 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=QqIE2-FUpKg}} | {{#widget:YouTube|id=QqIE2-FUpKg}} | ||
== Related Pages == | == Related Pages == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 73: | ||
* [[Geometric Unity Predictions]] | * [[Geometric Unity Predictions]] | ||
* [[You Know You’re in GU When]] | * [[You Know You’re in GU When]] | ||
* [[Ken Wilson]] | |||
* [[Effective Field Theory (EFT)]] | |||
[[Category:Ericisms]] | [[Category:Ericisms]] | ||
[[Category:Geometric Unity]] | [[Category:Geometric Unity]] | ||
[[Category:Physics]] | [[Category:Physics]] | ||