5,984
edits
Peer Review: Difference between revisions
→2021
No edit summary |
(→2021) |
||
| Line 454: | Line 454: | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445816124835196929 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=@DrBrianKeating @EcoHealthNYC Or this: | |||
https://conductscience.com/what-is-grant-proposal-peer-review/ | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
| Line 460: | Line 470: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=I have been warning you about Peer Review. Because almost no one says this, it sounds crazy. | |content=I have been warning you about [[Peer Review]]. Because almost no one says this, it sounds crazy. | ||
Dr Daszak & @EcoHealthNYC have been thoroughly Peer Reviewed and are endorsed by the highest levels of scientists. It’s ‘preposterous’ to question a decision to terminate their funding. | Dr Daszak & @EcoHealthNYC have been thoroughly [[Peer Review|Peer Reviewed]] and are endorsed by the highest levels of scientists. It’s ‘preposterous’ to question a decision to terminate their funding. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | ||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1445806211366932483-FBCJFczVgA80xkA.jpg | |media1=ERW-X-post-1445806211366932483-FBCJFczVgA80xkA.jpg | ||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806214055489537 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=I will be held up by PhDs as crazy for saying what I am about to say: | |||
Peer Review is INCREDIBLY dangerous. [[Peer Review|Modern Peer Review]] really begins in the 1960s. It has more to do with Ghislaine Maxwell’s father & Permagon Press than science. 77 Nobel laureates are wrong. We are right. | |||
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806215460622336 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Further the CCP supplies labor for these Nobel laureates to run their teams. Our labor program is disguised as “Graduate Study” and “Post-Doctoral training” so as to avoid unionization, wage scrutiny, and “Labor Certification”. | |||
Our professors are not acting as scientists here. | |||
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806218887372806 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=[[Peer Review]] has moved from where it began in BioMedicine, to a business model for shaking down universities forced to pay extortionary journal fees, to a funding game of keep away that keeps failed incumbents funded and competitors from being able to show those incumbents failed. | |||
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445808605639307274 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=What does it tell us about [[Peer Review]] that it allows Dr Daszak, a zoologist w/ a theory of preventing pandemics that sounds more similar to a bioweapon program scouring the earth for lethal pathogens, the ability to be defended by 77 laureates? | |||
This: [[Peer Review|Peer. Review.]] Doesn’t Work. | |||
|timestamp=5:50 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=DrBrianKeating-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/DrBrianKeating/status/1445811834150260740 | |||
|name=DrBrianKeating | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/DrBrianKeating | |||
|username=Prof. Brian Keating | |||
|content=“Peer review” is a term typically used for journal articles, not grant proposal reviews. I think it’s sloppy journalism by NPR. Perhaps it’s meant to regularize it for a non-scientific audience, comparing to something the public has heard of & considers the gold standard. | |||
|timestamp=6:02 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445815788103892993 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The world of biology and medicine grant making works differently than Physics and Mathematics just as NIH/Howard Hughes work differently from DOE/[[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]] respectively: | |||
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer-review.htm | |||
|timestamp=6:18 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=6:20 PM · Oct 6, 2021 | |||
}} | }} | ||