The Portal Wiki

National Science Foundation (NSF): Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

National Science Foundation (NSF) (edit)

Revision as of 22:57, 27 October 2025

9,137 bytes added ,  27 October
→‎2021
Line 1,808: Line 1,808:




{{#widget:Tweet|id=1386364097424285696}}
{{Tweet
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1392141883057446916}}
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1386365397285306369
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If I had to predict what will happen, I’d guess that the system will come to the mild conclusion that it needs better conflict reporting.  And it will reclassify all of this as ‘normal’ except a few outlying cases. Then there might be a bit of scapegoating.
 
Just a guess.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1386364097424285696
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=35 years after @nsf “Policy Research and Analysis” conspired w/ [[National Academy of Sciences (NAS)|NAS]] [[Government University Industry Research Round Table (GUIRR)|Government University Research Roundtable]] to sell out STEM-America.
 
I’ve been on this over 30 years. Is it finally happening? I doubt it.
 
Why? B/C it’s the *entire* STEM labor system.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/over-500-us-scientists-under-investigation-being-compromised-china-1586074
|media1=ERW-X-post-1386364097424285696.jpg
|timestamp=4:58 PM · Apr 25, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1386364098426806272
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=And here is a prediction. After we gut all of our advanced math and science, we are going to have a huge employer sponsored push to flood STEM markets with workers from abroad who were not subjected to “Diversity and Inclusion(tm)” re-education. Genius.
 
https://google.com/amp/s/www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/sns-tns-bc-edu-math-racist-20191010-story,amp.html
|timestamp=4:58 PM · Apr 25, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:04 PM · Apr 25, 2021
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1392141883057446916
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is hard to get a funder to understand something scientific when its anti-scientific objectives depend on its not understanding it.
 
Like [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] avoiding my claim that it secretly studied how to pressure American scientists to mitigate wage demands by using foreign labor in 1986.
 
https://x.com/2AGiRL21/status/1391884014831685632
|timestamp=3:37 PM · May 11, 2021
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797252643971079
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This is a big deal. Treat Dr Daszak & Dr Fauci as they deserve: central figures in some story involving grey area BioWarfare strategy and responsibilities that we ordinary humans don’t understand because no one will explain it.
 
The strategy failed: duh. Time to declassify it. 🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797247011082250
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I hadn’t been saying much about @EcoHealthNYC for a reason. I don’t have many mentors, but a man I respect as my mentor was on the board: a heroic figure to me & to others. So I had hoped that the situation there was under adult supervision.
 
I appear to have had misplaced hopes.
|timestamp=5:04 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797248982347776
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In a different world, these issues would first be dealt w/ behind the scenes so as to avoid destruction to our infrastructure. I assume @EcoHealthNYC is a typical proxy for the government which uses outside contractors to evade restrictions on government. But this is way beyond.
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797250215469056
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=No one has much commented on how high-powered the board has been. You have a director of the [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]] as a board member for example.
 
No one is asking the hard questions yet. Like [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]], this story doesn’t add up: I fear we don’t look for answers when we know many of them already.
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797251259912201
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If I were a reporter, I would ask the board members about @EcoHealthNYC’s BioWarfare responsibilities given its @doddtra relationship. I would ask the 77 Nobel laureates about who organized the letter supporting the funding of Dr Daszak.
 
Journalists: Break a sweat. What is this?
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445816124835196929
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@DrBrianKeating @EcoHealthNYC Or this:
 
https://conductscience.com/what-is-grant-proposal-peer-review/
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806211366932483
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I have been warning you about [[Peer Review]]. Because almost no one says this, it sounds crazy.
 
Dr Daszak & @EcoHealthNYC have been thoroughly [[Peer Review|Peer Reviewed]] and are endorsed by the highest levels of scientists. It’s ‘preposterous’ to question a decision to terminate their funding.
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1445806211366932483-FBCJFczVgA80xkA.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806214055489537
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I will be held up by PhDs as crazy for saying what I am about to say:
 
Peer Review is INCREDIBLY dangerous. [[Peer Review|Modern Peer Review]] really begins in the 1960s. It has more to do with Ghislaine Maxwell’s father & Permagon Press than science. 77 Nobel laureates are wrong. We are right.
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806215460622336
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Further the CCP supplies labor for these Nobel laureates to run their teams. Our labor program is disguised as “Graduate Study” and “Post-Doctoral training” so as to avoid unionization, wage scrutiny, and “Labor Certification”.
 
Our professors are not acting as scientists here.
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445806218887372806
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Peer Review]] has moved from where it began in BioMedicine, to a business model for shaking down universities forced to pay extortionary journal fees, to a funding game of keep away that keeps failed incumbents funded and competitors from being able to show those incumbents failed.
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445808605639307274
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What does it tell us about [[Peer Review]] that it allows Dr Daszak, a zoologist w/ a theory of preventing pandemics that sounds more similar to a bioweapon program scouring the earth for lethal pathogens, the ability to be defended by 77 laureates?
 
This: [[Peer Review|Peer. Review.]] Doesn’t Work.
|timestamp=5:50 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=DrBrianKeating-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/DrBrianKeating/status/1445811834150260740
|name=DrBrianKeating
|usernameurl=https://x.com/DrBrianKeating
|username=Prof. Brian Keating
|content=“Peer review” is a term typically used for journal articles, not grant proposal reviews. I think it’s sloppy journalism by NPR. Perhaps it’s meant to regularize it for a non-scientific audience, comparing to something the public has heard of & considers the gold standard.
|timestamp=6:02 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445815788103892993
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The world of biology and medicine grant making works differently than Physics and Mathematics just as NIH/Howard Hughes work differently from DOE/[[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]] respectively:
 
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer-review.htm
|timestamp=6:18 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
|timestamp=6:20 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1445797250215469056}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1445815788103892993}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1451999140183830530}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1451999140183830530}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1453780509960507401}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1453780509960507401}}
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/23395"