5,994
edits
| Line 362: | Line 362: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | Â | ||
{{ | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1553912139110199296 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=So my model is that Economics really changed. The old guys who did the most to lay the foundations were a lot less high on their own supply. They welcomed interactions with other disciplines. It feels like the 1970s transformed economics into something less intellectually honest. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1553909627862913024 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=âNone of the usual criteria that **real** experts use says that we are in a recession.â - Prof. @paulkrugman | |||
 | |||
Have you dealt w/ economics professionally as an academic from another field? If not, itâs exactly like this: âReason, fact, analysis, total bullshit, fact, a lie, fact.â | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=tomselliott-profile-lEL7IBnw.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1553775833998835715 | |||
|name=Tom Elliott | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/tomselliott | |||
|username=tomselliott | |||
|content=CNN's @brianstelter: "Can we dispense with the recession debate? Are we in a recession, and does the term matter? | |||
 | |||
Former Enron adviser @PaulKrugman: "No, we arenât and no, it doesnât." | |||
|timestamp=4:13 PM · Jul 31, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=1:05 AM · Aug 1, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1553909630517972992 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=In fact the truths, insights, facts, analysis, etc. are pretty compelling. And they are the majority of what economists circulate. | |||
 | |||
And then the conversation turns, and out comes the superior dismissive insufferable gaslighting. | |||
 | |||
And you think: âWhy ruin analysis with psychosis?â | |||
|timestamp=1:05 AM · Aug 1, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1553909631805599745 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=I was lucky enough as a younger man to get to know Ken Arrow and '''Paul Samuelson''' slightly. They didnât have this trait. Talking to Arrow or '''Samuelson''' was like talking to a research mathematician, biologist or physicist at the time. It wasnât switching between reality & propoganda. | |||
|timestamp=1:05 AM · Aug 1, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=1:14 AM · Aug 1, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
 | |||
 | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1589298124191043584 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=They have two black boxes. One is called [[CPI]] construction. One is called the Fed. The theory is a narrative. The narrative doesnât match the actions. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1589287901804007425 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Great question. Inflation is SUPPOSED to be a group valued field. In the case of bilateral trade itâs an element of GL(2,R) although the economists havenât gotten there yet. But it is mostly not a field on Geography. Itâs a field on path, Loop, preference and geographic spaces. | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=invisi_college1-profile-s_fl5CzZ.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/invisi_college1/status/1589261786934493184 | |||
|name=invisible_college | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/invisi_college1 | |||
|username=invisi_college1 | |||
|content=I have heard you say inflation looks more like a heat map, than a single number. Would you say a heat map by both geography and product? Good morning | |||
|timestamp=2:21 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=4:05 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=pirate_hodl-profile-TgytYQMj.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/pirate_hodl/status/1589295169005752321 | |||
|name=Pirate Hodl | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/pirate_hodl | |||
|username=pirate_hodl | |||
|content=And preference space is unknowable without just letting a free computation run. Anything else involves some humans telling other humans what their preferences must be. | |||
|timestamp=4:34 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1589296342685601792 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Sure! And as '''Samuelson''' said, it may not even be integrable. And it may be that you are mixing stocks and flows. Etc. But then donât say you are implementing Konus COLAs while pretending that mumbling â superlative Index number are exact for flexible functional formsâ makes sense. | |||
|timestamp=4:39 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1589296589717536769 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The main issue here is simply super invidious priestly bull shit used to cover the destruction of peopleâs lives. Thanks! | |||
|timestamp=4:40 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=pirate_hodl-profile-TgytYQMj.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/pirate_hodl/status/1589297448136343553 | |||
|name=Pirate Hodl | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/pirate_hodl | |||
|username=pirate_hodl | |||
|content=Wow, I'm going to have to Google half of that. I feel too dumb for this conversation. Am I reading correctly that the above tweet is sarcasm, and you're saying there's a deeper intellectual problem here? | |||
|timestamp=4:43 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=4:46 PM · Nov 6, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
=== 2023 === | === 2023 === | ||