Anti-Interesting: Difference between revisions

Line 204: Line 204:
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1627475762805891073}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1627475762805891073}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1670157696765689856}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1670157696765689856}}
=== 2024 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1857213467113165103
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In 9 days, this video about the second shooter has fewer than 4K views. I find that odd because I find Mike Benz to be pretty compelling.
Perhaps it’s not that interesting. Perhaps it’s anti-interesting. 🤷‍♀️
What’s your take?
[Thanks to @JakeOrthwein and @MikeBenzCyber.]
|timestamp=12:06 AM ¡ Nov 15, 2024
}}
=== 2025 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1887273223668310500
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I really want to know. And it is a totally fair question we were all trained not to even think about...let alone ask and expect a straight answer.
I don't see President Trump wanting to protect any group who tried to make sure he never took office again. https://t.co/qW6dTSGuTV
|media1=GjDw5VFXIAAHOfp.png
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1887267458379133023
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ryan Wesley Routh and USAID are both strongly tied to discrete American interests, assets, sources and methods in Ukraine.
Who was paying Routh in Ukraine, Afghanistan, etc.?
Is there no connection whatsoever?
Those are a crisp questions that can now, at last, be answered. https://t.co/9SZDBQi2HZ
|timestamp=10:30 PM ¡ Feb 5, 2025
|media1=GjDqTatWIAAISte.jpg
|media2=GjDq9zdXQAANzgB.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1887271985803055393
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=UFOs & Foreign Aid/NGOs are both broad programs with which to hide Aerospace development and covert operations respectively.
We don't need to be conspiracy theorizing anymore.
We can now simply be conspiracy inquiring.
It takes some getting used to. But we can just...ask.
And if you think that's nuts: then you EXPLAIN this construction worker turned would-be assassin? I'm all ears.
Just another misfit far from home near a war? That's it?
Let's get that on the record! From officials. Under oath.
I'd love to hear that, because trying to assasinate a once and future president is a HUGE deal. And we don't seem very interested in his oddball story. Why was this guy so '''anti-interesting'''? I find him utterly fascinating. At a minimum.
Such a crazy story! No? I'd pay to watch a documentary.
|timestamp=10:47 PM ¡ Feb 5, 2025
|media1=GjDvnppWkAA5MYV.jpg
|media2=GjDvrwXXAAAwbHL.jpg
}}
|timestamp=10:52 PM ¡ Feb 5, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1922242777422954949
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A very interesting question is why academics almost uniformly make fun of conspiracy theories…when presented by colleagues at least.
Los Alamos, Tuskegee, Human Terrain Systems, etc. all involved conspiracy BY ACADEMICS. Some were good. Some bad. Some ambiguous.
But isn’t it odd that conspiracies are a permanent part of human existence, yet trying to study them or theorize about them results in crippling professional penalties?
I am astonished that I have not heard one single physicist call @pmarca a liar for claiming the Biden Whitehouse revealed that entire public subfields of theoretical physics were taken off-line by the government for security reasons, and disappeared or went dark.
Nor have I heard “We have to look into this!”.
Nor have I heard “Wow! That is super interesting.” Just silence.
But what I have heard is academics finding it laughable that others find this is interesting.
The @pmarca claim about physics is thus one of the most '''anti-interesting''' claims I have ever heard. Everyone in physics just seems to intuitively know not to ask about it.
Has anyone seen @michiokaku, @neiltyson, @bgreene etc. commenting on this claim? I haven’t.
They all just know: Don’t go there girlfriend.
|timestamp=10:49 AM ¡ May 13, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1927743029252595973
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@codingquark @HeathHimself GU is both the most anti-interesting theory in history as well as the only theory that cannot be steelmanned.
|timestamp=3:05 PM ¡ May 28, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1942984516165079361
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was. Or whether he killed himself. Or what the "Client list" was. Because, like you, I don't actually know about any of those things. And I have never claimed that I do.
I am going to tell you with 100% absolute certainty that Epstein is "Anti-Interesting" to our news desks. No one want to publish a story about how his multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund worked by interviewing a few of those many former eployees that it must have had.
Or by reviewing the fillings it must have made to the Government. Or its trading records. Or by talking to the sell-side coverage it must have had. Or by going through it's records.
Or that it didn't exist. And he wasn't a Multi-Billion financier. And that someone set him up as a construct at great expense.
The scandal is not investigating. Not publishing, Not doing journalism. Clearly the state has control of our news.
I don't care where this leads. I believe he was most likely constructed by a *tiny* number of tight lipped psychopaths who set him up to ruin the lives of children in the service of gathering information. And those people...whoever they are...would need to be brought to justice. Whatever the cost.
I would like to think there isn't a father alive (no matter how flawed) who disagrees with that. And that we need to put ourselves at risk as a group to protect our children from the State, The Press and The Evil co-conspirators. And I don't know who they are. It's terrifying.
I also thing that a number of people who had nothing to do with that but who had deaings with Epstein (e.g. scientists) need to be separated from that aspect of evil and fully exonerated. And those that participated in the Evil with Epstein need to face justice as well.
Pretending that there is nothing further to see here, and that no one wants this investigated remains preposterous.
This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads?
https://t.co/Ff3q1MiqlS
|timestamp=4:29 PM ¡ Jul 9, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1944207557113049481
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I think many of you made a huge mistake about the “Client List”. About “Lolita Express”. About “Pedophile Island.” That is, if the goal was to use Epstein to get justice, and put an end to this abuse of children and civilians by the sickest members of the world’s ICs.
You had fun with memes. And you let an IC sponsored pedophile get away. We were supposed to be pushing the press:
“Why don’t you ask **any** truly detailed questions about a supposed multi billion dollar FX hedge fund that may not have existed at all?” That was…and is…the first order of business.
We can’t know exactly what he did, where and when.
But there is no way to fake this hedge fund. Either he had an enormous fund or he didn’t. We can get all the details if he did. Or push as to why they don’t exist.
I don’t know if he killed himself. I don’t even know if he is dead. I don’t know if there is “the Epstein client list”.
The thing we know best is that he claimed to manage a multibillion dollar fund that ***cannot*** be hidden. Where are its records and employees?????????” Why does the press avoid reporting on this fund like the plague???? It was headquartered at Villard House for Christ sake. Madison Avenue. Who liquidated it? Who worked there? wtf?
This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the world’s largest mega yachts…that somehow isn’t registered or flagged. It leaves no wake. No shipyard built it or serviced it. It has no crew. No harbor master has ever seen it.
“It’s so quiet that Lockheed asked to study it. It’s said to be made of optically neural superconducting ice crystals that form only from the tears of virgin sea lions cooled to absolute zero so it can’t be seen. He brilliantly purchased a Bugis Prahu Charter that was grandfathered in before the 1609 Mare Liberum was in force so that he alone may sail the seas without ever communicating with other vessels or harbors. It is said that his carbon fiber anchor and chain stretched to the bottom of the Challenger Deep so that he didn’t need to approach the shore for years on end.”
C’mon.
The key was that he wasn’t a “disgraced financier”. He was a construct fitted with a mysterious poorly drawn backstory. And that construct probably belonged to several Allied nation states:
“He’s so brilliant that he only accepts people who surrender total control of their wealth under power of attorney. He is closed to anyone who doesn’t have 1 Billion dollars minimum. In fact: his investor list is so discreet, and is said to be so secretive and closely guarded that he has only one known client.”
Did you not realize that outside investors are a liability to a cover story or front? Beware any super secretive fund that has a story why they dont want family office or institutional money. This is not the only one btw.
Hence…the exclusivity.
Why was he obsessed by Gravity? He was almost certainly a front used for funding edgy science, information gathering, control, etc away from normal channels.
It wasn’t one thing. He wasn’t a creepy front company…he was a mall filled with different business providing different goods and services. It wasn’t all about raping kids. Some collection of people invested something like 9 figures in creating a weird 11-12 figure fairy tale via leverage. And it was used for a lot of things. It was called Jeffrey Epstein.
Moral: focus on the cover story. Not the memes. Go after the press first. Figure out exactly who is stopping the fund from being dissected. Focus on the non reporting.
This is what Anti-Interesting is all about. Use it.
One man’s opinion. 🙏
https://t.co/BWT6zWwciq
|timestamp=1:29 AM ¡ Jul 13, 2025
}}


==Related Pages==
==Related Pages==