Free Speech: Difference between revisions

Free Speech (edit)

Revision as of 06:31, 29 September 2025

1,032 bytes added , 29 September

→‎2017

Pyrope

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors

5,984

edits

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/819971363112767489
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=While often tempted, I'm not a free speech absolutist. I'm an anti-utopian w a commitment to keep our world safe from well meaning utopians.
@@ Line 95: / Line 97: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/820433685463711744
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=I like free speech but not absolute free speech. The US is the finer but not the latter.
 |timestamp=4:53 PM · Jan 14, 2017
@@ Line 104: / Line 108: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/851082510721204225
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=Conclusion: my engagement patterns changed. Some of it is likely algorithmic. We should have a free speech option: time ordered, no filters.
 |timestamp=2:40 PM · Apr 09, 2017
@@ Line 113: / Line 119: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/873441322362961920
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=We're standing up to mob rule to fight for universal civil rights, academic freedom, science & free speech. Safety NOT guaranteed.
@@ Line 136: / Line 144: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/888552939769405440
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=VOICE OVER: We've secretly replaced Free-Speech America w new improved Sharia-compliant blasphemy-free America. Let's watch folks' reaction!
+|quote=
-|quote={{Tweet
+{{Tweet
 |image=LKrauss1-profile.jpg
 |nameurl=https://x.com/LKrauss1/status/888426038732050432
-|name=Susan Swartz
+|name=Lawrence M. Krauss
 |usernameurl=https://x.com/LKrauss1
 |username=LKrauss1
@@ Line 147: / Line 157: @@
 https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/richard-dawkins-deplatformed-at-a-book-talk-berkeley-for-abusive-speech-about-islam-on-twitter/
-|timestamp=
+|timestamp=3:50 PM · Jul 21, 2017
 }}
 |timestamp=12:15 AM · Jul 22, 2017
@@ Line 157: / Line 167: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908804532926164992
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=Clay, you weren't in a comedy club & your right to free speech wasn't infringed. You just put a colleague in a no win situation...& she won!
 |quote={{Tweet
 |image=ClayTravis-profile.jpg
@@ Line 178: / Line 189: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908816176414732288
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=End/ This isn't the crime of the century. But it's also not fair. There are implicit rules about jokes & flirting that aren't "free speech."
 |thread=
 {{Tweet
@@ Line 185: / Line 197: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908812060112252928
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=1/ You bet I do: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mn5crhTusSA
@@ Line 194: / Line 208: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908812852273741831
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=2/ Sarandon's character was host to two men. But it was she who turned the conversation sexy. Costner was offended (not outraged) & strong.
 |timestamp=Sep 15, 2017
@@ Line 201: / Line 217: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908813322769678336
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=3/ Sarandon wouldn't let him stay private crossing into his space. He responded to her as a sexual woman and an equal not a delicate flower.
 |timestamp=Sep 15, 2017
@@ Line 208: / Line 226: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908813910165164032
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=4/ He also was leaving her space and not remaining on her couch. This gave her choice without having to have her shut him down. A key issue.
 |timestamp=Sep 15, 2017
@@ Line 215: / Line 235: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/908814753866309632
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=5/ My point's simple. These issues are tricky & we've all screwed them up. But we don't just get to say any old thing. There are rules here.
 |timestamp=Sep 15, 2017
@@ Line 226: / Line 248: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/913560621450276864
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=On the death of @hughhefner, I had to remind myself of how a lost thinking US-Left playfully championed free speech:
@@ Line 237: / Line 261: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/943662668925116416
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=I should point out that unlike many friends, I’m *not* a free speech absolutist. Not a Trump voter. Not opposed to *some* discretion by the private sector as to whom it can deny service. But these are now utility like companies and something feels too...coordinated?...something.
@@ Line 244: / Line 270: @@
 |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/943654570424639488
 |name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
 |content=I believe @facebook, @Twitter, @Google are now deploying effective new measures & standards for securing US democracy against a repeat of unwanted involvement by unacceptable outsiders.