5,984
edits
Jeffrey Epstein: Difference between revisions
ââOn X
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== On X == | == On X == | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1258092729596182528 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=Listen carefully: you donât have to elect Biden or Trump. | |||
The world has woken up via being suddenly shut in doors by crazy incompetent people largely born in the 1940s and 1950s without a coherent explanation. Or plan. | |||
Lives lost. Nurses sacrificed. Jobs & businesses destroyed. | |||
You donât have to take these choices. *Nobody* smart wants these people except to defeat each other. You donât really like Fox. Or CNN. Or the NYT. Except when they go after your enemies. | |||
Okay. So go cold turkey. Call them all what they are: The UnWorkables. | |||
You would be better off with a thoughtful and competent 45 year old electrician or self made businessperson as president. Almost no ordinary people have family business interests in China or Ukraine. Chose anyone without dementia. Pick someone who canât remember the moon landing. | |||
Pick someone who never met '''Jeffrey Epstein'''. Pick someone who can code or with a masters degree or better in STEM. | |||
You donât have to keep picking the card the magician is forcing you to select as your card. Itâs not YOUR card. Itâs the magicianâs card. Grab the magicians wrist. | |||
That card says âBidenâ. Take that card and a lighter and set it on fire. Then grab the deck and pick another card, rifle it to check for markings on the back, look to see if they all say Biden, and chose a different card at random. This was never a primary. There was no election. | |||
If the enormous generation of you young folk canât use this mismanagement of a pandemic by a bipartisan kleptocratic gerontocracy, then you arenât thinking like young folk at all. Demand your debt free future and the removal of this preposterous class of ancient legacy predators. | |||
Learned helplessness is UnAmerican. This is like China or Russia controlling our minds from a bad sci-fi thriller. But we are being controlled by our grandparents and parents instead. And they donât care. | |||
This is beyond insane and it has never been like this. Ever. | |||
Rant over. | |||
|timestamp=10:54 AM · May 6, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1249039288177549312}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1248701529055363073}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1237449910800101382}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1237170528395218944}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421386590220288 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=Where are we on State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots? | |||
Letâs try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasnât behind Epstein if we canât ask the question of Epsteinâs ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole. | |||
Why is that anti-interesting? Wouldnât we want to be sure that Epsteinâs fortune didnât come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didnât and arenât reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us. | |||
Pursue this even further: if news desks arenât asking these questions, arenât they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they arenât willing to *ask* Qs? | |||
Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase âNo Commentâ is familiar to anyone my age from this time. | |||
Where is that phrase? | |||
It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions. | |||
|timestamp=7:59 AM · Feb 28, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233410237387771907 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=The digital layer allows us to measure the market demand for many genuinely fascinating topics in which the legacy journalism layer pretends to take zero interest. | |||
Odd. Guaranteed markets on real topics. Zero interest. Ownership of media by interests who do not need profit. | |||
The digital layer allows us to to see reporters following people they never acknowledge even exist. | |||
Who really cares? Why does it matter? Because institutions agree never to treat as real that which remains confined to the digital layer alone. Hence the reason weâve stagnated. | |||
Iâd like to know where the âlast known whereabouts of Ghislaine Maxwellâ and âlocation of Epstein trading records from Villard Houseâ and âties to intelligenceâ investigations are stalled out. Even where these stories ran into brick walls would be fascinating. Where is the DISC? | |||
|timestamp=7:14 AM · Feb 28, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 339: | Line 416: | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179678842933248}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179678842933248}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1230880091896348673}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1230880091896348673}} | ||
 | |||
 | |||
 | |||
 | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1262849887432962048}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1262849887432962048}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1274455316659269632}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1274455316659269632}} | ||