5,984
edits
Peer Review: Difference between revisions
→On X
(→Quotes) |
(→On X) |
||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
== On X == | == On X == | ||
{{ | <div class="tweet"> | ||
{{ | <div class="tweet-header"> | ||
<div class="tweet-header-image"> | |||
[[File:{{{image|Eric profile picture.jpg}}}]] | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet-header-name"> | |||
[{{{name|https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5759528816 '''Eric Weinstein'''}}}] | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet-content"> | |||
CLAIM: It is unethical to offer rent seekers anonymity w/ peer review if they refuse to risk profit 'shorting' what they block. | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet-date"> | |||
Nov 15, 2009 | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet"> | |||
<div class="tweet-header"> | |||
<div class="tweet-header-image"> | |||
[[File:{{{image|Eric profile picture.jpg}}}]] | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet-header-name"> | |||
[{{{name|https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5765238763 '''Eric Weinstein'''}}}] | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet-content"> | |||
Q:Given that 'peer review' is objectively a major danger to innovators, why make it difficult-to-impossible to arbitrage? Cui bono? | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="tweet-date"> | |||
Nov 16, 2009 | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=55469441726693377}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=55469441726693377}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=363741507557142529}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=363741507557142529}} | ||