Graph, Wall, Tome: Difference between revisions

Graph, Wall, Tome (edit)

Revision as of 08:09, 30 January 2020

6 bytes added , 30 January 2020

→‎The Graph

AaronH

43

edits

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 == The Graph ==
-The '''paragraph''' by Edward Witten as [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928296366853328896?s=20 posted by Eric via Twitter].
-[[file:The-graph.png]]
-However, there are 3 flaws with it:
-* In (ii), “vector bundle X” should be changed to principal G-bundle.
-* Also in (ii), “nonabelian gauge group G” should be changed to nonabelian structure group G.
-* In (iii), <math>\ R</math> and <math>\tilde R</math> should be (complex) linear representations of G and so they are not equivalent.
-=== Expansion ===
-Converted to text and re-written according to 'flaws'
 <blockquote>
@@ Line 75: / Line 59: @@
 All of this must be supplemented with the understanding that the geometrical laws obeyed by the metric tensor, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_gauge_theory gauge fields], and the fermions are to be interpreted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics quantum mechanical] terms.
 </blockquote>
+=== Origin ===
+This is a modified version of the paragraph by Edward Witten as [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928296366853328896?s=20 posted by Eric via Twitter].
+[[file:The-graph.png|300px]]
+Eric Weinstein suggested 3 alterations, that have been included above.:
+* In (ii), “vector bundle X” should be changed to principal G-bundle.
+* Also in (ii), “nonabelian gauge group G” should be changed to nonabelian structure group G.
+* In (iii), <math>\ R</math> and <math>\tilde R</math> should be (complex) linear representations of G and so they are not equivalent.
 == The Wall ==