Editing 14: London Tsai - The Reclusive Dean of The New Escherians
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
== Transcript == | == Transcript == | ||
<small>[[Episode 14 VTT File]] ([https://theportal.wiki/images/3/34/EW_-_11-30-19_-_London_Tsai_Full_with_Ads_v2.vtt raw file])</small> | <small>[[Episode 14 VTT File]] ([https://theportal.wiki/images/3/34/EW_-_11-30-19_-_London_Tsai_Full_with_Ads_v2.vtt raw file])</small> | ||
{{Transcript blurb|bloglink=https://theportal.group/14-london-tsai-the-reclusive-dean-of-the-new-escherians/|ai=[https://otter.ai/ Otter.ai]|madeby=Brooke|source=[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVYCqK19-ww YouTube]|editors=Aardvark#5610|furthercontributors=Tim (TimMelon#7940)}} | {{Transcript blurb|bloglink=https://theportal.group/14-london-tsai-the-reclusive-dean-of-the-new-escherians/|ai=[https://otter.ai/ Otter.ai]|madeby=Brooke|source=[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVYCqK19-ww YouTube]|editors=Aardvark#5610|furthercontributors=Tim (TimMelon#7940)}} | ||
===Housekeeping=== | ===Housekeeping=== | ||
Line 106: | Line 105: | ||
00:04:01<br> | 00:04:01<br> | ||
'''London Tsai:''' No author, yeah. And it's just, it's just there, and you could study it, and it was infinitely deep. You could pick up any part and you could just keep going, and everything just fit together so nicely, and I just wanted to see more and understand more. And, you know, all the mathematical writing that was on the blackboards, like from the graduate classes and things like that, I wanted to understand what they were aboutâand they | '''London Tsai:''' No author, yeah. And it's just, it's just there, and you could study it, and it was infinitely deep. You could pick up any part and you could just keep going, and everything just fit together so nicely, and I just wanted to see more and understand more. And, you know, all the mathematical writing that was on the blackboards, like from the graduate classes and things like that, I wanted to understand what they were aboutâand they must be representatives of some sort of world that I didn't have access to at the time. | ||
00:04:47<br> | 00:04:47<br> | ||
Line 182: | Line 181: | ||
00:13:47<br> | 00:13:47<br> | ||
So for example, behind you right now, there's an amazing painting that I've seen for yearsâand I think I've actually used it in a talk at Columbia as the cover art for the first slideâof what I assume is Heinz Hopf's famous fibration from the early 1930s. And so it's the series of interlocking partial torii, each of which is filled up by circles, and it's a very impressionistic, but also somewhat rigorous, description of this object that on the Joe Rogan program I said may be the most important object in the universe, because when we talk about physics being ultimately a theory of waves, we want to know, well, what are those waves waves | So for example, behind you right now, there's an amazing painting that I've seen for yearsâand I think I've actually used it in a talk at Columbia as the cover art for the first slideâof what I assume is Heinz Hopf's famous fibration from the early 1930s. And so it's the series of interlocking partial torii, each of which is filled up by circles, and it's a very impressionistic, but also somewhat rigorous, description of this object that on the Joe Rogan program I said may be the most important object in the universe, because when we talk about physics being ultimately a theory of waves, we want to know, well, what are those waves waves in? What is the analog of the ocean for an ocean wave inside of physics? Â | ||
00:14:53<br> | 00:14:53<br> | ||
Line 194: | Line 193: | ||
00:15:56<br> | 00:15:56<br> | ||
J'accuseâwell, no, I mean, this is an important link. I guess this is what I'm trying to say, is that you are somehow breaking the secrecy. It's like, you know, Prometheus gave fire to man. Okay, well you are now bringing bundles to the masses. And I think it's fantastic because it allows people to skip the symbolic step, which is usually what leaves them out of participatingâat least as observersâof the amazing museum of mathematical finds. Can you talk a little bit about what caused you to do these two works? The principal bundle behind you, whichâwhat do we call this Hopf fibration behind you? | |||
00:16:46<br> | 00:16:46<br> | ||
Line 271: | Line 270: | ||
00:25:41<br> | 00:25:41<br> | ||
'''Eric Weinstein:''' Okay. Let me try another one. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose Roger Penrose], who wrote | '''Eric Weinstein:''' Okay. Let me try another one. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose Roger Penrose], who wrote The Road to Reality, is of course a relatively famous person, drew the first copy of the Hopf fibration that I had ever seen. It is strikingly like your own. Have you seen that? | ||
00:25:58<br> | 00:25:58<br> | ||
'''London Tsai:''' I have. I have that book, | '''London Tsai:''' I have. I have that book, The Road to Reality. And I have some some of his more recent books as well. But I think the first picture of a Hopf fibration I ever saw was Bill Thurston's, in his Three-dimensional Geometry and Topology. | ||
00:26:14<br> | 00:26:14<br> | ||
Line 289: | Line 288: | ||
00:26:38<br> | 00:26:38<br> | ||
'''Eric Weinstein:''' So Bill Thurston, of course, was famous within mathematics as being a Fields medalist, who contributed to | '''Eric Weinstein:''' So Bill Thurston, of course, was famous within mathematics as being a Fields medalist, who contributed to Grisha Perelman's program for solving the Poincare conjecture in dimension 3, proving that any sphere that was sufficiently simple from its algebraic properties had to actually be the 3-dimensional version of the sphere. | ||
00:27:03<br> | 00:27:03<br> | ||
Line 495: | Line 494: | ||
00:47:38<br> | 00:47:38<br> | ||
'''London Tsai:''' No, that's a good, that's a greatâwell, I did a series of talks when I lived in Seattle. So I went to University of Washington, where I knew a couple mathematicians. And it was a series of works I called | '''London Tsai:''' No, that's a good, that's a greatâwell, I did a series of talks when I lived in Seattle. So I went to University of Washington, where I knew a couple mathematicians. And it was a series of works I called Demonstrations. It was kind of inspired by da Vinci's scientific drawings, [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dimostrazione ''dimostrazione'']. And so I invited UW mathematicians to supply me with theorems of theirs, and I would attempt to come up with my own interpretation. That was that was a fun project, I got to know a few mathematicians at the UW. And yeah, that sort of collaboration was something I was very interested in, about 10 years ago. | ||
00:48:38<br> | 00:48:38<br> | ||
Line 627: | Line 626: | ||
00:54:50<br> | 00:54:50<br> | ||
'''Eric Weinstein:''' And are you at all familiar with any of these attempts to push math, and reverence for math, out to the general public that are somewhat off of the direct depiction? I don't know if you've ever seen my friend [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Frenkel Edward Frenkel's] short film | '''Eric Weinstein:''' And are you at all familiar with any of these attempts to push math, and reverence for math, out to the general public that are somewhat off of the direct depiction? I don't know if you've ever seen my friend [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Frenkel Edward Frenkel's] short film Love and Math. And then he wrote a book. | ||
00:55:15<br> | 00:55:15<br> |