Sources and Methods
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.On X
2021
What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile & trafficker.
Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a âBlue on Blueâ screw up?
Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?
Q: Do our sources and methods permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?
Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn & @npr conspicuously will not?
Q: Do you have the financial records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs supposed âhedge fundâ offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund?
Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? đ
Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & donât ever call @TwitterSafety âSafetyâ again.
So this just appears now!?! And what do we learn? That if "Sources and Methods" of the Intelligence Community might be compromised, prosecutors regularly decline to push for full prosecution EVEN IN THE CASE OF SEXUAL ABUSE of minors and INFANTS.
Bingo: Follow the Silence.
I have spent a decade, literally, collecting hundreds of IG reports from the CIA via #FOIA. I've filed 13 requests and sued the agency 3 times since 2012. When @a_cormier_ & I started to review these docs earlier this year we spotted a disturbing pattern
We have an undisclosed program; there's some kind of 'understanding' that we don't understand. I very well understand why we don't casually compromise "Sources & Methods". But trafficking kids is NOT casual business. Nor is USING them as part of 'Sources & Methods' for kompromat.
One question now creates 2 teams:
Team A) 'Sources & Methods' are above child trafficking in importance.
Team B) Child Trafficking is above any exemption for our 'Sources & Methods'.
I believe that if Epstein needed to use kids for S&M as Kompromat, we lost our plot entirely.
Seriously, I am not being naive here. If we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we don't have the right to a nation? If our intelligence community is so pathetic...look you get the idea. If the US isn't protecting kids from our own IC, we aren't the US.
I understand we may occassionally have to fell a monster overseas. I understand that sometimes there's a ticking time bomb and 'extraordinary methods' are needed. I understand that we must surveil people or engage in illegal acts while undercover.
But you-can't-use-kids. Period.
Is there some GIANT understanding involving our journalists & news desks that when the IC says 'Sources & Methods' we all just say 'Ok. Anything you say boys.' Like, for example with @arobach being shut down on Epstein:
Abuse of Kids > Sources & Methods
Notice how everything adds up if there's a giant understanding that Sources & Methods trump everything protecting innocent children? You just say 'Sources & Methods are at risk'. Explains Acosta, Robach, Veritas, etc. Boom: No more Epstein mysteries. It's all 'Sources & Methods'.
Q: Why no discussion of Villard House records?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why no investigation of Epstein's Hedge Fund's trading partners & brokerage?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why do editors claim no one cares about Epstein?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Project Veritas?
A: S&M.
Q: Why report Epstein was a disgraced Financier when no one seems to have traded with him?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why so little interest in covering Ghislaine relative to Kyle Rittenhouse?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why did no one ask where GM last crossed a border?
A: S & M.
Moral: Our kids cant vote. We bring them into the world totally dependent on us. If we have a country that deserves an Intelligence Service, we have a right to know that kids are 100% OFF LIMITS as regards 'Sources & Methods' by the IC of us or our allies. Period. Kids >>> S & M.
P.S. And...I appear to be back to being throttled more agressively after several threads were throttled less agressively or not at all by twitter.
At least at first on this thread. We will see whether that continues. CC'ing @lexfridman @benshapiro @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg
Q: Is this about institutions directed to protect âSources and Methodsâ?
There have been more articles about Joe Roganâs podcast than the biggest human trafficking trial in history.
Iâm not seeing the trial we would normally expect, given what we suspect. We donât see the coverage we would normally expect.
Ultra-weak prosecution. Weak coverage. The whole thing stinks.
Iâm in no way sure that this trial is that big of a deal, the way itâs being conducted.
I have been told that âSources and Methodsâ of the IC must be protected by any means necessary.
That is likely the most parsimonious explanation for why the Epstein case never resolves. Something seems to happen to everything and everyone who could clear it up.
Is this a conspiracy theory?
Well, think about it like this. When the Intelligence Community is doing itâs job properly itâs supposed to generate conspiracies for the public good. So saying the IC is a conspiracy factory isnât a conspiracy theory; itâs part of a job description.
Further, we definitely have an âEvent Deconflictionâ system to make sure that local law enforcement & district attorneys donât bust & prosecute undercover federal agents, screwing up our secret programs. Events are called âBlue on Blue.â
So that isnât a conspiracy theory either.
Additionally, the use of honey traps, honey pots, and kompromat are all well known as tools of the IC, as is disinformation.
None of that is conspiracy theory either.
The only thing you can object to as irresponsible conspiracy theory is the assertion that this may apply here.
I submit this to you that âThis likely is the best explanation of all the improbable things that keep happening which keep us from learning the truth in this case.â
This isnât remotely tin foil hat territory. This looks like state protection of the Sources and Methods of the IC.
2025
Ryan Wesley Routh and USAID are both strongly tied to discrete American interests, assets, sources and methods in Ukraine.
Who was paying Routh in Ukraine, Afghanistan, etc.? Is there no connection whatsoever?
Those are a crisp questions that can now, at last, be answered.
UFOs & Foreign Aid/NGOs are both broad programs with which to hide Aerospace development and covert operations respectively.
We don't need to be conspiracy theorizing anymore.
We can now simply be conspiracy inquiring.
It takes some getting used to. But we can just...ask.
And if you think that's nuts: then you EXPLAIN this construction worker turned would-be assassin? I'm all ears.
Just another misfit far from home near a war? That's it? Let's get that on the record! From officials. Under oath.
I'd love to hear that, because trying to assasinate a once and future president is a HUGE deal. And we don't seem very interested in his oddball story. Why was this guy so anti-interesting? I find him utterly fascinating. At a minimum.
Such a crazy story! No? I'd pay to watch a documentary.
I really want to know. And it is a totally fair question we were all trained not to even think about...let alone ask and expect a straight answer.
I don't see President Trump wanting to protect any group who tried to make sure he never took office again.
