Peer Review: Difference between revisions

Peer Review (edit)

Revision as of 16:52, 28 September 2025

6,302 bytes added , 28 September

→‎2022

Pyrope

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors

5,984

edits

@@ Line 444: / Line 444: @@
 === 2022 ===
-{{#widget:Tweet|id=1483860161965932544}}
-{{#widget:Tweet|id=1485039821047287811}}
+{{Tweet
-{{#widget:Tweet|id=1486001426862166018}}
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
-{{#widget:Tweet|id=1491813693042008067}}
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1483860161965932544
-{{#widget:Tweet|id=1530227311403884544}}
+|name=Eric Weinstein
-{{#widget:Tweet|id=1581039245610733568}}
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=We should discuss this graph more.
+|timestamp=5:53 PM · Jan 19, 2022
+|media1=ERW-X-post-1483860161965932544-FJe683sVIAMF4LW.jpg
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1485039821047287811
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Academe. We still haven’t woken up to the destruction of Robert Maxwell, '''Peer Review''', oversight &amp; transparency.
+If you still believe that peer review has always been the gold standard in science, you simply didn’t want to look at the history of Permagon Press and its aftermath.
+|quote=
+{{Tweet
+|image=DGlaucomflecken-profile.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/DGlaucomflecken/status/1484679759829209090
+|name=Dr. Glaucomflecken
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/DGlaucomflecken
+|username=DGlaucomflecken
+|content=Nature does open access
+|media1=DGlaucomflecken-X-post-1484679759829209090.png
+|timestamp=12:10 AM · Jan 22, 2022
+}}
+|timestamp=12:00 AM · Jan 23, 2022
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1486003790423547904
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=This is a system in which the appearance of fairness and objectivity is masking a collection of inner mechanisms that are far more important, and that are often intensely interpersonal rather than dispassionate and objective.
+|thread=
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1486001426862166018
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=If you are having trouble with “Trust the Science(tm)”, then we really need to talk about the disaster that is modern '''Peer Review''' and Academic Publication across all technical subjects:
+https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2022/01/25/how-do-things-work-at-top-econ-journals-exactly-this-is-one-weird-ass-story/
+|timestamp=3:42 PM · Jan 25, 2022
+}}
+|timestamp=3:51 PM · Jan 25, 2022
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1491813693042008067
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Monthly Reminder Moral: it’s really really really hard to fake a field. Economic Index Numbers like CPI are not real numbers. They are naturally group-valued *FIELDS* that would be nearly impossible to fake and manipulate.
+The *entire* subject is off. '''Peer review''' won’t help. 🙏
+|media1=ERW-X-post-1491813693042008067-FLP8pUdUcAEwwlo.jpg
+|timestamp=4:37 PM · Feb 10, 2022
+|thread=
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1491811219161817090
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=I understand that CPI is 7.5%.
+Different question. Look at the spread.
+Tell me how we got 7.5%? Do you have any idea what 7.5% means?
+Now listen to who repeats this number.
+If they said 7.57348977% ± 0.0000003% you would be laughing.
+We should be laughing, not nodding.
+|quote=
+{{Tweet
+|image=charliebilello-profile.png
+|nameurl=https://x.com/charliebilello/status/1491767729736536073
+|name=Charlie Bilello
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/charliebilello
+|username=charliebilello
+|content=Price increases over last year (CPI report)</br>
+Used Cars: +40.5%</br>
+Gasoline: +40.0%</br>
+Gas Utilities: +23.9%</br>
+Meats/Fish/Eggs: +12.2%</br>
+New Cars: +12.2%</br>
+Electricity: +10.7%</br>
+Overall CPI: +7.5%</br>
+Food at home: +7.4%</br>
+Food away from home: +6.4%</br>
+Transportation: +5.6%</br>
+Apparel: +5.3%</br>
+Shelter: +4.4%
+|timestamp=1:35 PM · Feb 10, 2022
+}}
+|timestamp=4:28 PM · Feb 10, 2022
+}}
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1530230628020461568
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Am I mad? Not in the slightest. As to why scientists can’t afford to look at the truth, the author correctly put his finger on that issue too: Academic research has what I call a “Hotel California” problem.
+The author may have publicly checked out of legacy journal work. But…
+|media1=ERW-X-post-1530230628020461568-FTx4pKcVIAAD4qN.jpg
+|thread=
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1530226540876771329
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Academics have to be quite sensitive. Even the bold of academe don’t want to talk about how we quietly switched from editors holding the reins at a few high quality journals, to '''peer review''' mysteriously taking over as the number of lower tier journals exploded.
+Crazy talk… ;-)
+|timestamp=4:36 PM · May 27, 2022
+|media1=ERW-X-post-1530226540876771329-FTx07XYUsAAOk7X.jpg
+|media2=ERW-X-post-1530226540876771329-FTx07XWUsAAGebH.jpg
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1530227311403884544
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Don’t take it from me. Look at the history yourself with these search terms:
+History of Peer Review in Science
+Pergamon Press
+Robert Maxwell
+Number of academic Journals over time
+Cost of Academic journal subscription
+Reviewer compensation
+Tuition over time
+Good luck.
+|timestamp=4:39 PM · May 27, 2022
+|media1=ERW-X-post-1530227311403884544-FTx1oKaVIAEEfed.jpg
+}}
+|timestamp=4:53 PM · May 27, 2022
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1581039245610733568
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content='''Peer review''', always fails, real review.
+|quote=
+{{Tweet
+|image=michael_nielsen-profile.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/michael_nielsen/status/1580950048841469952
+|name=Michael Nielsen
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/michael_nielsen
+|username=michael_nielsen
+|content=I enjoy the ironic expansion of the meaning of "the Matthew Effect" in the subtitle.  Maybe familiarity would make people more likely to click...
+|media1=michael_nielsen-X-post-1580950048841469952-FfCpbWMUUAAAygH.png
+|timestamp=3:53 PM · Oct 14, 2022
+}}
+|timestamp=9:48 PM · Oct 14, 2022
+}}
 === 2023 ===