The Portal Wiki

Theory of Geometric Unity: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Theory of Geometric Unity (view source)

Revision as of 18:26, 23 September 2025

5,158 bytes added ,  23 September
→‎2023
Line 522: Line 522:


=== 2023 ===
=== 2023 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1623353348438249472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The irremovable singularities of GR indicate that Einstein is an intermediate theory. It’s NOT final. And I wouldn’t want to face an adversary that knew the ultimate theory while I was still back in spacetime thinking.
Spacetime may not be hackable,
but it’s successors may be.🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1623353344344596491
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I want to use the argument made to make a point. “Light years” is a mathematical concept. Newtonian gravitation & Einstein’s general relativity are our past & current mathematical maps of the physical “territory”.
The Map ≠ The Territory.
I’m focused on post-Einsteinian maps.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=montuakmo66-profile.png
|nameurl=https://x.com/montuakmo66/status/1623345762745589760
|name=Montuakmo66
|usernameurl=https://x.com/montuakmo66
|username=montuakmo66
|content=You know the laws of physics, you understand probability, you understand how many stars are within a 100 light years of Earth.  ... So let us stop pretending there is any possibility that this is nothing more than a con.
|timestamp=3:39 PM ¡ Feb 8, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:09 PM ¡ Feb 8, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1623353346395602946
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I am worried that should any entity get a Post Einsteinian map, those with only GR will be “owned” by those with the advantage. Think neutrons.
GU is by its nature, a post Einsteinian theory. It recovers spacetime from a more general structure.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GL77oOnrPzY Nima Arkani-Hamed: The End of Space-Time]
|timestamp=4:09 PM ¡ Feb 8, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:09 PM ¡ Feb 8, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638578352989806595
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Perhaps one simple thing I might add is that only with one temporal dimension do boundary conditions become initial conditions. Boundary conditions are more general and Ultra Hyperbolic equations can be defined so that Hyperbolic relativistic equations are a quirky special case.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638575793185099782
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I don’t know how to answer. I believe that the world beyond Einstein does not have a 1,3 metric where that 1 means a single future.
If I’m correct, the world is 7,7 or 5,9 pulled back to 1,3. So I decline to answer: I don’t know how to think about my own model’s pasts/futures.
https://x.com/cdse2403/status/1638538814086889472
|timestamp=4:18 PM ¡ Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638575795726876672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As I have said in public, I find it EXTREMELY difficult to conceptualize multiple temporal dimensions. Just because I can see that they are there in my model, does not mean  I am smart enough to understand their consequences. Sorry to disappoint. Try Itzhak Bars at USC?
Be well.
|timestamp=4:18 PM ¡ Mar 22, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:28 PM ¡ Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638586542745882624
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Gimel pulls back field content native to Y back to X. Gimel^{1,3} does the pulling back of the data (sections over Y). It is the stylus that samples the record Y^{7,7} (or Y^{5,9} in the second GU variant that is physical) and plays it back. In GU, spacetime is just the Victrola.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638575793185099782
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I don’t know how to answer. I believe that the world beyond Einstein does not have a 1,3 metric where that 1 means a single future.
If I’m correct, the world is 7,7 or 5,9 pulled back to 1,3. So I decline to answer: I don’t know how to think about my own model’s pasts/futures.
https://x.com/cdse2403/status/1638538814086889472
|timestamp=4:18 PM ¡ Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=ldgaetano-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/ldgaetano/status/1638584213078257665
|name=Luca D'Angelo
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ldgaetano
|username=ldgaetano
|content=If gimel is native to X, then what is the pullback of gimel? Or is gimel native to Y?
|timestamp=4:51 PM ¡ Mar 22, 2023
}}
|timestamp=5:00 PM ¡ Mar 22, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/22356"