Jessupization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Portal-jessupization.jpg]] | [[File:Portal-jessupization.jpg|thumb]] | ||
'''Jessupization''', n.: The transformation of a previously open free society by actors within its governing class, to one in which the electorate cannot be trusted with even a basic outline of what is happening & why, via the abuse of âneed-to-knowâ or âsources & methodsâ privileges. | '''Jessupization''', n.: The transformation of a previously open free society by actors within its governing class, to one in which the electorate cannot be trusted with even a basic outline of what is happening & why, via the abuse of âneed-to-knowâ or âsources & methodsâ privileges. | ||
Revision as of 07:25, 12 July 2025
Jessupization, n.: The transformation of a previously open free society by actors within its governing class, to one in which the electorate cannot be trusted with even a basic outline of what is happening & why, via the abuse of âneed-to-knowâ or âsources & methodsâ privileges.
In the eras before late stage Jessupization, hearings would have been held on the exact nature of the relationship between @EcoHealthNYC and @doddtra in light of the mystery surrounding the origin of the virus.
- Eric Weinstein on X
On X
Imagine:
A) âReformedâ Pakistan Backed Taliban as Secret US Regional Security Partner.
B) The Wuhan Laboratory as US Bioweapons Research Partner.
C) Jeffrey Epstein as Trusted Intelligence Partner.
D) EcoHealth alliance as Sensitive Information/Defense Conduit.
were correct.
You would have a pattern. The US government would be trying to get things done (e.g. keeping tabs on PRC Bioweapon research) without an ability to explain anything.
No one wants to explain: âThe US protects pedophiles, works with fundamentalist killers, and empowers its rivals.â
But if you look at it, we donât seem to be getting to the bottom of ANY of these various stories. Itâs as if each story is just too uninteresting or draining to pursue for our Pulitzer hungry journalists. No one wants to hold truly in-depth hearings. Well, why arenât we digging?
Is it that our top leaders know all these truths already? That they have a common issue: we attempted to shackle scientists, spies, generals, geopolitical strategists to a point that they found unbelievably unethical workarounds for EVERYTHING we tried to get them to stop doing?
Are our media, political and research classes effectively telling us: âWe donât owe you a thing. You put restrictions on us so we couldnât move. These nutty workarounds were needed and theyâre all YOUR fault. Not ours. We were trying to do your work until you made it impossible.â
Imagine the Colonel Jessup. Only, this time, heâs not merely evil but also real and NOT good at his job. He is reborn as an incompetent who cannot do his job.
And he lacks the integrity of a real leader to blurt out that he did in fact order the Code Red: https://youtu.be/9FnO3igOkOk
Take a look at the @EcoHealthNYC and @NIAID leadership.
I think what I want at this point is the truth about what we are up to in Afghanistan, Sexual Kompromat, BioWeapons research, inflated money Supply, etc. And I think what they think is that weâre simply not entitled to it.
Only problem is that this is still a democracy, weâre a free people, they work for us, and weâre right on this and theyâre wrong.
I think we need to see that all these big stories may be fitting a pattern: it may simply be Col. Jessupes (and their kluges) all the way down. đ
Related Pages
- Anti-Interesting
- Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue
- Digital Wetwork
- Image Cheapening
- Institutional Gaslighting
- The Invisible World is First Detected by the Visible Worldâs Failure to Close
- Law of Gaslighting
- Map the Silences
- Neo-Debunker
- Nothing Burger
- Prebunked Malinformation
- Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing
- Seberging
- Universal Institutional Betrayal
