Anti-Interesting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''- Eric Weinstein''' on [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1462468183663595522 X] | '''- Eric Weinstein''' on [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1462468183663595522 X] | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==On Youtube== | |||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=HDLuSjc-f6Q}} | |||
==On X== | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1462468183663595522}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1462468183663595522}} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1257067241914298369}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1257067241914298369}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1233421390029606912}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1233421390029606912}} | ||
==Related Concepts== | |||
* [[The Invisible World is First Detected by the Visible World's Failure to Close]] | |||
* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]] | |||
[[Category:Ericisms]] | [[Category:Ericisms]] | ||
[[Category:DISC]] | [[Category:DISC]] | ||
Revision as of 20:07, 30 August 2024
Anti-interesting, adj.: A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for its investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
- Eric Weinstein on X
Something is anti-interesting when it is newsworthy in the extreme and fascinating to consumers of news but the editors show a preternatural disinterest in covering it. “The world has moved on.” “Nobody knows who these people are.” “There’s not enough here.” “Tin Foil Hat story.”
- Eric Weinstein on X
On Youtube
On X