Blue on Blue: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary  |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=tim_cook-profile.jpg | |image=tim_cook-profile-Pwq-1eJc.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/tim_cook/status/1420869950692937729 | |nameurl=https://x.com/tim_cook/status/1420869950692937729 | ||
|name=Tim Cook | |name=Tim Cook | ||
| Line 276: | Line 276: | ||
== Related Pages == | == Related Pages == | ||
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | * [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | ||
* [[Deconfliction]] | |||
* [[Follow the Silence]] | * [[Follow the Silence]] | ||
* [[Jeffrey Epstein]] | * [[Jeffrey Epstein]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:31, 1 December 2025
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.
Distrust ANYONE like Apple who supports scanning your *private* photos, but wonât call for hearings into Jeffrey Epsteinâs fictitious multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund or will ask why NO top dedicated newsdesk will investigate his ties to Intelligence Communities. https://x.com/alexstamos/sta/alexstamos/status/1424054542879006728
This is an easy tell: people who have **less** than **zero** interest in elite pedophiles connected to intelligence, want intelligence on everyone, dominated by ordinary non-pedophiles. If youâre dumb enough to believe this i canât help you.
This is about control, not children.
When you see this campaign, remember this: the face that has the privacy is hidden. Thatâs Apple.
The face being recorded? Why, thatâs you. The sucker.
Prove me wrong @alexstamos, @apple and Tim Cook: join me in calling for hearings into the Intelligence Community, its connection to Jeffrey Epstein and state protected pedophilia in our highest âeliteâ Echelons.
No? Thought so. This is sickening. Creepy Cowardice? Thatâs iPhone.
If I have this wrong, @tim_cook I will happily apologize. Will you join me in calling for open investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and ANY ties he had to the Intelligence Community? Whether he was let off through âevent deconflictionâ in a âBlue on Blue incidentâ in S. Florida? đ
What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile & trafficker.
Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a âBlue on Blueâ screw up?
Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?
Q: Do our sources and methods permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?
Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn & @npr conspicuously will not?
Q: Do you have the financial records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs supposed âhedge fundâ offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund?
Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? đ
Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & donât ever call @TwitterSafety âSafetyâ again.
It is hard to read this story of Epsteinâs inexplicable deal with prosecutors without specialized vocabulary not meant for the public. The magical words are likely to be âevent deconflictionâ and âblue on blue incidentâ.
Otherwise you would think that this is about Ken Starr.
If any reporters want to ask about the history of deconfliction between the Federal and International IC and local law enforcement they can contact these entities listed by the DOJ.
This lists the three major deconfliction database systems: SAFETNet, RISsafe, and Case Explorer:
I just called to ask CaseExplorer for South Florida about the history and federal participation in deconfliction circa 2000-2008. I was getting the history going back to 1990.
Then I mentioned a Jeffrey Epstein.
âSir, I am now going to terminate this call.â
Reporters? Anyone?
The Guardian called him a Billionaire. The New York Times called him a suicide. Others called him a disgraced Financier.
Wouldnât we have to rule out IC construct? Why will no media ask about the possibility of a state sponsored Pedophile IC operation?
Is there no press at all?
He was not a billionaire. He was not a currency trading hedge fund genius. He was not a simple suicide.
This isnât about Ken Starr.
I would not trust any newspaper that refuses to ask this question:
Was Epstein a state sponsored operation tripped over by local law enforcement?
I have been told that âSources and Methodsâ of the IC must be protected by any means necessary.
That is likely the most parsimonious explanation for why the Epstein case never resolves. Something seems to happen to everything and everyone who could clear it up.
Is this a conspiracy theory?
Well, think about it like this. When the Intelligence Community is doing itâs job properly itâs supposed to generate conspiracies for the public good. So saying the IC is a conspiracy factory isnât a conspiracy theory; itâs part of a job description.
Further, we definitely have an âEvent Deconflictionâ system to make sure that local law enforcement & district attorneys donât bust & prosecute undercover federal agents, screwing up our secret programs. Events are called âBlue on Blue.â
So that isnât a conspiracy theory either.
Additionally, the use of honey traps, honey pots, and kompromat are all well known as tools of the IC, as is disinformation.
None of that is conspiracy theory either.
The only thing you can object to as irresponsible conspiracy theory is the assertion that this may apply here.
I submit this to you that âThis likely is the best explanation of all the improbable things that keep happening which keep us from learning the truth in this case.â
This isnât remotely tin foil hat territory. This looks like state protection of the Sources and Methods of the IC.