User talk:BeefSandwich27: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Old Meeting Notes: new section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* If you fail in those responsibilities, you should: | * If you fail in those responsibilities, you should: | ||
* 4. Accept that you could not steer the conversation in a productive direction, leave the conversation for at least 1 hour. | * 4. Accept that you could not steer the conversation in a productive direction, leave the conversation for at least 1 hour. | ||
== Testing Images == | |||
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/000/745/success.jpg | |||
== Old To-Do == | |||
The page [[To Do]] was yours, but it doesn't seem to fit the wiki's current use. I've copied its content to here and commented it out, and deleted the page. | |||
[[User:Aardvark|Aardvark]] 15:55, 1 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
<!-- == Notes 2020-04-22 == | |||
* Feynman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Commission_Report | |||
== Notes 2020-04-20 == | |||
* https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~leila.schneps/grothendieckcircle/Letters/GS.pdf | |||
* A desire, expressed by Eric, to share speeches, quotes, essays and other short-form writings. | |||
* A potential sharing subsection regarding parenting and insights on child cognition. | |||
Quotations: | |||
...the man whose business is writing experiences a kind of flash --for this intellectual life, anything but passive, is really made of fragments; it is in a way composed of elements very brief, yet felt to be very rich in possibilities, which do not illuminate the whole mind, which indicate to the mind, rather, that there are forms completely new which it is sure to be able to possess after a certain amount of work. Sometimes I have observed this moment when a sensation arrives at the mind; it is as a gleam of light, not so much illuminating as dazzling. This arrival calls attention, points, rather than illuminates, and in the end, is itself an enigma which carries with it the assurance that it can be postponed. You say, 'I see, and then tomorrow I shall see more.' There is an activity, a special sensitization; soon you will go into the dark-room and the picture will be seen to emerge. --Paul Valery | |||
I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives. | |||
- Tolstoy | |||
A person first gets a new idea and he wonders very much whether this idea will be right or wrong. He is very anxious about it, and any feature in the new idea which differs from the old established ideas is a source of anxiety to him. Whereas someone else who hears about this work and takes it up doesn’t have the same anxiety, an anxiety to preserve the correctness of the basic idea at all costs, and without having this anxiety he is not so disturbed by the contradiction and is able to face up to it and see what it really means. I expect that was just Heisenberg’s problem. He was afraid that this lack of commutation might cause the whole theory to collapse; he was probably terribly worried about that. That rather stops him from really facing up to it. | |||
-- Dirac | |||
A mathematician who is not also a poet will never be a complete mathematician. - Karl Weierstrass --> | |||
== Old Meeting Notes == | |||
The page [[Meeting Notes]] was yours, but it doesn't seem to fit the wiki's current use. I've copied its content here and deleted the page. | |||
=== 2020-02-03 === | |||
'''quick quick notes... with lots of errors, etc, but here you go:''' | |||
he really liked the hyperlinked wall and seeing actual work getting done (great job boqu!) | |||
we don't have to accept received wisdom rewrite the tome | |||
digital contributions in reddit. Remember it's important to leave your goddamn name on it so we can shout you out | |||
jesse producer | |||
science is "stagnating" more than tech | |||
lack of heterodox thinking | |||
decline of polymath interdomain thinking contributes to science slowdown, which effects tech slowdown | |||
breakthrough science is caught in pockets that don't get funding | |||
almost at a breakthrough but can't get funding | |||
pwang99 | |||
vc money isnt' dumb but not that smart | |||
VCs often follow others | |||
you can't pattern match for outrageous genius | |||
we don't know what real genius looks like anymore (not just hollwood cliches) | |||
maybe vcs aren't even optimizing for not losing money (possible ponzi issues) | |||
daedalus | |||
mathemeticians find it hard to communicate... | |||
eric | |||
math books devoid of intuition. merely formal | |||
a huge difference between what we think we're saying and what we want to say | |||
monopoly on violence = government (it's hard to recognize the object from the description) | |||
rigor vs intuition (something worth tackling) | |||
ethan hammond | |||
naseem taleb black swans | |||
discovering revolutionary ideas in sex research | |||
eric | |||
some people are uncomfortable being on "popular" programs (naseem mentioned on twitter that he agreed) | |||
episode 19 was watched heavily, numerous tweets about it | |||
long telemeres specific to lab rodents, jax lab | |||
DISC, how real is it? what is its scope? | |||
Latest revision as of 17:19, 1 November 2020
Getting started[edit]
- Configuration settings list
- MediaWiki FAQ
- MediaWiki release mailing list
- Localise MediaWiki for your language
- Learn how to combat spam on your wiki
Hello[edit]
KevB-ing (talk)--
I offered some responses to:
https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Things_we_need_to_fix
--21:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Stolen from IDW LA Discord[edit]
I like these. Putting these here for now, so I can figure out what I can do with them later.
If you believe someone is engaging in bad faith you have three responsibilities:
- 1. Maintain a charitable attitude. (Ask questions in earnest about why they believe what they believe)
- 2. Continue to engage in good faith. (Don’t stoop to their level)
- 3. Attempt to steer the conversation in a productive direction. (eg. Steelman: ask for clarification and see if you can restate their argument in a way they would accept)
- If you fail in those responsibilities, you should:
- 4. Accept that you could not steer the conversation in a productive direction, leave the conversation for at least 1 hour.
Testing Images[edit]
Old To-Do[edit]
The page To Do was yours, but it doesn't seem to fit the wiki's current use. I've copied its content to here and commented it out, and deleted the page.
Aardvark 15:55, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Old Meeting Notes[edit]
The page Meeting Notes was yours, but it doesn't seem to fit the wiki's current use. I've copied its content here and deleted the page.
2020-02-03[edit]
quick quick notes... with lots of errors, etc, but here you go:
he really liked the hyperlinked wall and seeing actual work getting done (great job boqu!) we don't have to accept received wisdom rewrite the tome digital contributions in reddit. Remember it's important to leave your goddamn name on it so we can shout you out
jesse producer science is "stagnating" more than tech lack of heterodox thinking decline of polymath interdomain thinking contributes to science slowdown, which effects tech slowdown breakthrough science is caught in pockets that don't get funding almost at a breakthrough but can't get funding
pwang99 vc money isnt' dumb but not that smart VCs often follow others you can't pattern match for outrageous genius we don't know what real genius looks like anymore (not just hollwood cliches) maybe vcs aren't even optimizing for not losing money (possible ponzi issues)
daedalus mathemeticians find it hard to communicate...
eric math books devoid of intuition. merely formal a huge difference between what we think we're saying and what we want to say monopoly on violence = government (it's hard to recognize the object from the description) rigor vs intuition (something worth tackling)
ethan hammond naseem taleb black swans discovering revolutionary ideas in sex research
eric some people are uncomfortable being on "popular" programs (naseem mentioned on twitter that he agreed) episode 19 was watched heavily, numerous tweets about it long telemeres specific to lab rodents, jax lab DISC, how real is it? what is its scope?