The Portal Community: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We should say who we are and who we are not. | We should say who we are and who we are not. | ||
== | == We Value == | ||
* Good faith arguments | * Good faith arguments | ||
* Avoiding logical fallacies | * Avoiding logical fallacies |
Revision as of 12:48, 7 February 2020
We should say who we are and who we are not.
We Value
- Good faith arguments
- Avoiding logical fallacies
- No ad hominem attacks
- Awareness of cognitive bias
- Prioritizing first principles thinking
Independent Thinking
Eric talks about how he's interested in finding people who are negative on all these scales. Who wouldn't generally fall for these traps:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment