Anti-Interesting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 347: | Line 347: | ||
This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads? | This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads? | ||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=dJNjH4SP6vw}} | |||
|timestamp=4:29 PM ¡ Jul 9, 2025 | |timestamp=4:29 PM ¡ Jul 9, 2025 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 396: | Line 396: | ||
One manâs opinion. đ Â | One manâs opinion. đ Â | ||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=vjwf9F_v5cI}} | |||
|timestamp=1:29 AM ¡ Jul 13, 2025 | |timestamp=1:29 AM ¡ Jul 13, 2025 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:26, 30 September 2025
The concept of "Anti-Interesting," originated by Eric Weinstein, describes phenomena, events, or topics that are inherently fascinating, newsworthy, and potentially of great public interest but are deliberately underreported, ignored, or downplayed by mainstream media and other institutional actors. The essence of the concept lies in the idea that these topics are not simply "uninteresting" but are actively suppressed because they threaten established narratives, powerful institutions, or vested interests.
Anti-interesting, adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for itâs investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
Weinstein argues that "anti-interesting" subjects often involve significant discrepancies or "failures to close" within the visible world, where the observable facts or events do not align with the narratives presented by media and authorities. These discrepancies suggest the existence of an "invisible world"âforces or agendas working behind the scenes to control what is reported or discussed publicly.
Examples Eric has cited as "anti-interesting" include the lack of media interest in Jeffrey Epstein's wealth origins, "hedge fund" currency trading records and filings, and ties to intelligence, the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic's origins and the role of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak, President Joe Biden's Cognitive Decline, and various other significant issues that, despite their potential to captivate the public, are sidelined in public discourse.
In essence, "anti-interesting" highlights the disconnect between what should naturally draw public attention and what is actually allowed to surface in mainstream narratives, pointing to an underlying mechanism of control that dictates the boundaries of acceptable discourse.
Something is anti-interesting when it is newsworthy in the extreme and fascinating to consumers of news but the editors show a preternatural disinterest in covering it. âThe world has moved on.â âNobody knows who these people are.â âThereâs not enough here.â âTin Foil Hat story.â
On YouTube
More On X
2020
Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news & professors. They are not disinterested, but anti-interested. Except for Greg.
if you haven't listened to this then you're in for a crazy, unhinged but brilliant ride.
What is anti-interesting? Well Jeffery Epsteinâs wealth source is anti-interesting to media. Bernie in 2016 was anti-interesting to @nytimes. Income inequality was anti-interesting to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was anti-interesting. Building Seven too.
To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically anti-interesting. Flight 800 is pretty anti-interesting as was the Boskin Commissionâs attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the CPI. The H1-B visa history is anti-interesting. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.
Anti-interesting, adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for itâs investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
But I find these things fascinating. As do we all. Do stay tuned to The Portal.
More to come. Thanks @greggutfeld!
If you want to see this theory of Idea Suppression in action, retweet the first tweet in the thread with hashtag #SlipTheDISC. Hey, who knows...We might be able to change the game.
Where are we on State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots?
Letâs try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasnât behind Epstein if we canât ask the question of Epsteinâs ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole.
Why is that anti-interesting? Wouldnât we want to be sure that Epsteinâs fortune didnât come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didnât and arenât reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us.
Pursue this even further: if news desks arenât asking these questions, arenât they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they arenât willing to *ask* Qs?
Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase âNo Commentâ is familiar to anyone my age from this time.
Where is that phrase?
It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions.
Ghislaine Maxwell is the most anti-interesting person on earth. She remained not worth locating, questioning or investigating during all of April.
2021
2022
Q: Are Enormous Canadian Trucker Protests Anti-Interesting? If so, why? https://t.co/YpXZC3g2jX
2023
2024
In 9 days, this video about the second shooter has fewer than 4K views. I find that odd because I find Mike Benz to be pretty compelling.
Perhaps itâs not that interesting. Perhaps itâs anti-interesting. đ¤ˇââď¸
Whatâs your take?
[Thanks to @JakeOrthwein and @MikeBenzCyber.]
2025
Ryan Wesley Routh and USAID are both strongly tied to discrete American interests, assets, sources and methods in Ukraine.
Who was paying Routh in Ukraine, Afghanistan, etc.? Is there no connection whatsoever?
Those are a crisp questions that can now, at last, be answered. https://t.co/9SZDBQi2HZ
UFOs & Foreign Aid/NGOs are both broad programs with which to hide Aerospace development and covert operations respectively.
We don't need to be conspiracy theorizing anymore.
We can now simply be conspiracy inquiring.
It takes some getting used to. But we can just...ask.
And if you think that's nuts: then you EXPLAIN this construction worker turned would-be assassin? I'm all ears.
Just another misfit far from home near a war? That's it? Let's get that on the record! From officials. Under oath.
I'd love to hear that, because trying to assasinate a once and future president is a HUGE deal. And we don't seem very interested in his oddball story. Why was this guy so anti-interesting? I find him utterly fascinating. At a minimum.
Such a crazy story! No? I'd pay to watch a documentary.
I really want to know. And it is a totally fair question we were all trained not to even think about...let alone ask and expect a straight answer.
I don't see President Trump wanting to protect any group who tried to make sure he never took office again. https://t.co/qW6dTSGuTV
A very interesting question is why academics almost uniformly make fun of conspiracy theoriesâŚwhen presented by colleagues at least.
Los Alamos, Tuskegee, Human Terrain Systems, etc. all involved conspiracy BY ACADEMICS. Some were good. Some bad. Some ambiguous.
But isnât it odd that conspiracies are a permanent part of human existence, yet trying to study them or theorize about them results in crippling professional penalties?
I am astonished that I have not heard one single physicist call @pmarca a liar for claiming the Biden Whitehouse revealed that entire public subfields of theoretical physics were taken off-line by the government for security reasons, and disappeared or went dark.
Nor have I heard âWe have to look into this!â. Nor have I heard âWow! That is super interesting.â Just silence.
But what I have heard is academics finding it laughable that others find this is interesting.
The @pmarca claim about physics is thus one of the most anti-interesting claims I have ever heard. Everyone in physics just seems to intuitively know not to ask about it.
Has anyone seen @michiokaku, @neiltyson, @bgreene etc. commenting on this claim? I havenât.
They all just know: Donât go there girlfriend.
@codingquark @HeathHimself GU is both the most anti-interesting theory in history as well as the only theory that cannot be steelmanned.
I am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was. Or whether he killed himself. Or what the "Client list" was. Because, like you, I don't actually know about any of those things. And I have never claimed that I do.
I am going to tell you with 100% absolute certainty that Epstein is "Anti-Interesting" to our news desks. No one want to publish a story about how his multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund worked by interviewing a few of those many former eployees that it must have had.
Or by reviewing the fillings it must have made to the Government. Or its trading records. Or by talking to the sell-side coverage it must have had. Or by going through it's records.
Or that it didn't exist. And he wasn't a Multi-Billion financier. And that someone set him up as a construct at great expense.
The scandal is not investigating. Not publishing, Not doing journalism. Clearly the state has control of our news.
I don't care where this leads. I believe he was most likely constructed by a *tiny* number of tight lipped psychopaths who set him up to ruin the lives of children in the service of gathering information. And those people...whoever they are...would need to be brought to justice. Whatever the cost.
I would like to think there isn't a father alive (no matter how flawed) who disagrees with that. And that we need to put ourselves at risk as a group to protect our children from the State, The Press and The Evil co-conspirators. And I don't know who they are. It's terrifying.
I also thing that a number of people who had nothing to do with that but who had deaings with Epstein (e.g. scientists) need to be separated from that aspect of evil and fully exonerated. And those that participated in the Evil with Epstein need to face justice as well.
Pretending that there is nothing further to see here, and that no one wants this investigated remains preposterous.
This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads?
I think many of you made a huge mistake about the âClient Listâ. About âLolita Expressâ. About âPedophile Island.â That is, if the goal was to use Epstein to get justice, and put an end to this abuse of children and civilians by the sickest members of the worldâs ICs.
You had fun with memes. And you let an IC sponsored pedophile get away. We were supposed to be pushing the press:
âWhy donât you ask **any** truly detailed questions about a supposed multi billion dollar FX hedge fund that may not have existed at all?â That wasâŚand isâŚthe first order of business.
We canât know exactly what he did, where and when.
But there is no way to fake this hedge fund. Either he had an enormous fund or he didnât. We can get all the details if he did. Or push as to why they donât exist.
I donât know if he killed himself. I donât even know if he is dead. I donât know if there is âthe Epstein client listâ.
The thing we know best is that he claimed to manage a multibillion dollar fund that ***cannot*** be hidden. Where are its records and employees?????????â Why does the press avoid reporting on this fund like the plague???? It was headquartered at Villard House for Christ sake. Madison Avenue. Who liquidated it? Who worked there? wtf?
This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the worldâs largest mega yachtsâŚthat somehow isnât registered or flagged. It leaves no wake. No shipyard built it or serviced it. It has no crew. No harbor master has ever seen it.
âItâs so quiet that Lockheed asked to study it. Itâs said to be made of optically neural superconducting ice crystals that form only from the tears of virgin sea lions cooled to absolute zero so it canât be seen. He brilliantly purchased a Bugis Prahu Charter that was grandfathered in before the 1609 Mare Liberum was in force so that he alone may sail the seas without ever communicating with other vessels or harbors. It is said that his carbon fiber anchor and chain stretched to the bottom of the Challenger Deep so that he didnât need to approach the shore for years on end.â
Câmon.
The key was that he wasnât a âdisgraced financierâ. He was a construct fitted with a mysterious poorly drawn backstory. And that construct probably belonged to several Allied nation states:
âHeâs so brilliant that he only accepts people who surrender total control of their wealth under power of attorney. He is closed to anyone who doesnât have 1 Billion dollars minimum. In fact: his investor list is so discreet, and is said to be so secretive and closely guarded that he has only one known client.â
Did you not realize that outside investors are a liability to a cover story or front? Beware any super secretive fund that has a story why they dont want family office or institutional money. This is not the only one btw.
HenceâŚthe exclusivity.
Why was he obsessed by Gravity? He was almost certainly a front used for funding edgy science, information gathering, control, etc away from normal channels.
It wasnât one thing. He wasnât a creepy front companyâŚhe was a mall filled with different business providing different goods and services. It wasnât all about raping kids. Some collection of people invested something like 9 figures in creating a weird 11-12 figure fairy tale via leverage. And it was used for a lot of things. It was called Jeffrey Epstein.
Moral: focus on the cover story. Not the memes. Go after the press first. Figure out exactly who is stopping the fund from being dissected. Focus on the non reporting.
This is what Anti-Interesting is all about. Use it.
One manâs opinion. đ
Related Pages
- The Portal Ep 25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein
- Anechoic Era or Anechoic media
- Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue
- Follow the Silence
- Jeffrey Epstein
- Jessupization
- The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)
- The Invisible World is First Detected by the Visible Worldâs Failure to Close
- Nothing Burger
- Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing