Geometric Unity Predictions: Difference between revisions

From The Portal Wiki
No edit summary
Ā 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#widget:YouTube|id=PYRYXhU4kxM|start=4261}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=PYRYXhU4kxM|start=4261}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872173033017346}}
{{Tweet
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872184387039232}}
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872186740080647}}
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379874520526299136
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872188593926144}}
|name=Eric Weinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379874520526299136}}
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=P.P.S. Remember that GU rejects three generations. In GU itā€™s 2 True generations plus 1 imposter. A priori, this could also be an effect of the imposter not being a true generation.
Ā 
Again I would need QFT colleagues trying to help me see if that is a possible effect.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872173033017346
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In strong GU:
Ā 
SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) (Standard Model)
Ā 
Is contained in U(3)xU(2) inside
Ā 
Spin(6)xSpin(4)
=SU(4)xSU(2)xSU(2)
(Before the more difficult non compact Spin(6,4).)
Ā 
Iā€™d look first to the extra 1D reductive U(1) if the experiments hold up. Then to Spin(6) x Spin(4):
|media1=ERW-X-post-1379872173033017346.jpg
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=11Equity-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/11Equity/status/1379832703848230916
|name=11
|usernameurl=https://x.com/11Equity
|username=11Equity
|content=@EricRWeinstein What are your thoughts on this and how does it fit with Geometric Unity?
https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677
|timestamp=4:25 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872179026677760
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As far as Fermion quantum number predictions that could open up new channels, Strong GU makes clear predictions. Explicitly, here would be the next Spin-1/2 particles internal symmetries we should find:
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1379872179026677760.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872184387039232
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Additionally, Strong GU predicts that there will be 16 Spin-3/2 particles with Standard model symmetries conjugate to the Spin-1/2 generations and gives their ā€˜internalā€™ quantum numbers as:
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1379872184387039232.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872185871822848
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now, why if GU makes predictions do I appear to some to shy away from them?
Ā 
A: I donā€™t.
Ā 
But string theorists hide the fact that they disconnected themselves from normal science by trying to force everyone else *except* String Theorists into answering hyperspecific challenges.
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872186740080647
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Thus while I can tell you what GU predicts is next, they push for a QFT calculation of energy scale to make others sound vague.
Ā 
So letā€™s talk vague: Look at the above containments and SM quantum numbers. Thatā€™s not vague. Now ask String Theorists the SAME question...and compare.
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872187692187648
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Lastly: I would caution about getting too far ahead of our experimentalist friends. Let them sort out their confidence and not push them to be too definite prematurely.
Ā 
But my advice is to watch *relative* predictive responses of those w/ ā€œBeyond the Standard Modelā€ theories.
šŸ™
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872188593926144
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=P.S. Happy to attempt to sharpen what GU can say. But not working on my own outside the community. If you want more precise predictions than I already have, Iā€™d need access to normal resources (e.g. constructive QFT colleagues). Working outside from home itā€™s probably impossible.
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
|timestamp=7:11 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}


{{stub}}
{{stub}}
Line 15: Line 119:
* [[Gauge Theory]]
* [[Gauge Theory]]
* [[General Relativity]]
* [[General Relativity]]
* [[Iā€™ve Got a Good Feeling About This]]
* [[Peer Injunction]]
* [[Peer Injunction]]
* [[Peer Review]]
* [[Peer Review]]

Latest revision as of 17:29, 27 September 2025

Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

In strong GU:

SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) (Standard Model)

Is contained in U(3)xU(2) inside

Spin(6)xSpin(4) =SU(4)xSU(2)xSU(2)

(Before the more difficult non compact Spin(6,4).)

Iā€™d look first to the extra 1D reductive U(1) if the experiments hold up. Then to Spin(6) x Spin(4):

ERW-X-post-1379872173033017346.jpg
7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
11Equity-profile.jpg
11

@EricRWeinstein What are your thoughts on this and how does it fit with Geometric Unity? https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677

4:25 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

As far as Fermion quantum number predictions that could open up new channels, Strong GU makes clear predictions. Explicitly, here would be the next Spin-1/2 particles internal symmetries we should find:

ERW-X-post-1379872179026677760.jpg
7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

Additionally, Strong GU predicts that there will be 16 Spin-3/2 particles with Standard model symmetries conjugate to the Spin-1/2 generations and gives their ā€˜internalā€™ quantum numbers as:

ERW-X-post-1379872184387039232.jpg
7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

Now, why if GU makes predictions do I appear to some to shy away from them?

A: I donā€™t.

But string theorists hide the fact that they disconnected themselves from normal science by trying to force everyone else *except* String Theorists into answering hyperspecific challenges.

7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

Thus while I can tell you what GU predicts is next, they push for a QFT calculation of energy scale to make others sound vague.

So letā€™s talk vague: Look at the above containments and SM quantum numbers. Thatā€™s not vague. Now ask String Theorists the SAME question...and compare.

7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

Lastly: I would caution about getting too far ahead of our experimentalist friends. Let them sort out their confidence and not push them to be too definite prematurely.

But my advice is to watch *relative* predictive responses of those w/ ā€œBeyond the Standard Modelā€ theories. šŸ™

7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

P.S. Happy to attempt to sharpen what GU can say. But not working on my own outside the community. If you want more precise predictions than I already have, Iā€™d need access to normal resources (e.g. constructive QFT colleagues). Working outside from home itā€™s probably impossible.

7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
Eric profile picture.jpg
Eric Weinstein

P.P.S. Remember that GU rejects three generations. In GU itā€™s 2 True generations plus 1 imposter. A priori, this could also be an effect of the imposter not being a true generation.

Again I would need QFT colleagues trying to help me see if that is a possible effect.

7:11 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
MW-Icon-Warning.png This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.

Related Pages[edit]

Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/index.php?title=Geometric_Unity_Predictions&oldid=22498"