The Portal Wiki

Theory of Geometric Unity: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Theory of Geometric Unity (view source)

Revision as of 16:32, 26 September 2025

10,268 bytes added ,  26 September
→‎2022
Line 1,146: Line 1,146:
}}
}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1570092276206149632}}
 
<!--
{{Tweet
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1580319424627691520}}
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1584687193599401985}}
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570098837645332486
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1584687932039798784}}
|name=Eric Weinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1584688956171759622}}
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1586046812682481664}}
|username=EricRWeinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1603869062945067009}}
|content=So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didn’t take #UFO seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence.
-->
 
And if #ScienceTwitter wants to know why I spun on a dime, it’s because it IS linked to the post-Einsteinian physics of our survival.
🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570090986969403394
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Under Newton, we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905.
 
Einstein then enforced house arrest to our solar system:1905-Now.
 
@elonmusk then said chemical rockets could get us 2 more spheres w Newtonian laws.
 
But survival hinges on going *beyond* Einstein, not back to Newton.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=rogerahicks-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/rogerahicks/status/1570080616032473090
|name=Philosopher Kin/Roger the Racist/Race Realist.
|usernameurl=https://x.com/rogerahicks
|username=rogerahicks
|content=Did you really say that, Eric?
 
Like EVERY civilisation before us, not destroyed by some rival, we are on course to self-destruct long before we become a multi-planetary species.
 
Your Brother, Bret's, #EvolutionaryLens should reveal this to him, but doesn't seem to have done.
|timestamp=4:43 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
|timestamp=4:43 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570092276206149632
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’m not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. That’s the basic plot.
 
Either there is freedom to leave based on new ideas, like GU, or the Einsteinian restrictions will persist.
 
If they persist; we probably can mildly elongate survival here by decades via wisdom.
|timestamp=4:49 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570095403038814215
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit.
 
This brings us to UFO/UAP. Assuming a distribution of life in the cosmos:: some life is behind us in science, with others ahead.
 
A (loose) argument then links UAP to survival:
|timestamp=5:01 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570096379405676544
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If life is abundant &amp; we’re not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), I’d guess that UAP would be here if that is possible in Einstein’s successor theories. The absence of UAP is strong but *inconclusive* proof that Einstein’s restrictions persist in all theory.
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570097237136658433
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Hence my interest in UAP. UAP from distant worlds would be a strong indication that it is possible to diversify our shared risk which is that all known technological life is dependent on one atmosphere linking our three main existential risks:
 
A) Climate</br>
B) Pathogen</br>
C) Radiation
|timestamp=5:08 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
|timestamp=5:15 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1580319424627691520
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=11) Science Policy Theory (V Bush)</br>
12) Selection (Abstracted)</br>
13) Comparative Eschatology</br>
14) Anti-Gravity Pseudo-science involving top physicists and mathematicians in the era of the So-Called ‘Golden age of General Relativity’.</br>
15) GU</br>
16) Mind control.
 
Remember: you asked! ;-)
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1580319421330907136
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1) General Relativity</br>
2) (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry</br>
3) Quantum Field Theory</br>
4) Material Science/Condensed Matter</br>
5) Nuclear Physics/Weaponry</br>
6) Disinformation Theory</br>
7) Cult Indoctrination/Deprogramming</br>
8) Propaganda</br>
9) Preference Falsification Theory</br>
10) Mansfield Amendment
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=OneFineDia_-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/OneFineDia_/status/1580313382666014720
|name=One Fine Day
|usernameurl=https://x.com/OneFineDia_
|username=OneFineDia_
|content=@LueElizondo recently gave a small list of topics he would recommend for study to begin to wrangle "the Phenomenon", if he "were king". What areas of intersectional learning do YOU think are needed and should be more deeply looked into? Your ufology curriculum. Thanks, Eric.
|timestamp=9:44 PM · Oct 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=10:08 PM · Oct 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=10:08 PM · Oct 12, 2022
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584688956171759622
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I wish people would stop talking about higher dimensional beings though. If GU is on point, then we are also higher dimensional beings. So I could do without Exoticism. If this is in any way real, we should reserve speech for precise meanings. And I don’t know if it is real. Yet.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584685455077179392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Willing to answer a few more Tweets on the San Marino UAP conference where I unexpectedly was asked to fill in for @LueElizondo. I’m likely to get throttled &amp; harassed yet again. When and if the beloved Twitter nanny algorithm starts again, I’ll call it a night here in Rome.
 
Go!
|media1=ERW-X-post-1584685455077179392-Ff3vBSbXEAEye24.jpg
|timestamp=11:17 PM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=McLuhanStates-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/McLuhanStates/status/1584686356630208512
|name=Marshall
|usernameurl=https://x.com/McLuhanStates
|username=McLuhanStates
|content=Has any of this episode inspired you to pursue  your GU theory with greater zest? Is there an interdimensional route opening?
|timestamp=11:20 PM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584687193599401985
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=There is a lot of loose talk about dimensionality. Keep in mind that I have zero direct evidence of the phenomena. So this is wildly premature.
 
My interest here is that GU replaces one manifold with two in a bundle structure and adds BOTH temporal and spatial dimensions.
|timestamp=11:24 PM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1584687932039798784
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As the author of GU, I still don’t know how to think in multiple temporal dimensions. The math is quite exotic. But I at least know through GU that the math can FORCE us to confront ultra hyperbolic PDE. It would change everything we know if unscreened. No simple Hamiltonian.
|timestamp=11:26 PM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
|timestamp=11:31 PM · Oct 24, 2022
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1586046812682481664
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let’s go slow. GU has GR as a sub theory. So if GR was wildly wrong, it wouldn’t be good for GU. It pays to be excited with extreme caution. I hadn’t seen this though. So thanks!
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=joerogan-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/joerogan/status/1586042786901549056
|name=Joe Rogan
|usernameurl=https://x.com/joerogan
|username=joerogan
|content=Astrophysicists make observations consistent with the predictions of an alternative theory of gravity
https://phys.org/news/2022-10-astrophysicists-alternative-theory-gravity.html
|timestamp=5:10 PM · Oct 28, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=PecoraroJarrod-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/PecoraroJarrod/status/1586043836857552896
|name=Browncoat
|usernameurl=https://x.com/PecoraroJarrod
|username=PecoraroJarrod
|content=@EricRWeinstein come teach.
|timestamp=5:14 PM · Oct 28, 2022
}}
|timestamp=5:26 PM · Oct 28, 2022
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1603869062945067009
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Word to the wise: watch when they figure out the work on CPI and, most importantly, GU. “Gonna be lit.”
 
Same story, but on steroids: institutions can’t deny reality at this scale forever. Too many enormous lies to maintain indefinitely . The instit. Kayfabe collapse is coming.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1603866949129482240
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So,I was  ̶d̶e̶r̶a̶n̶g̶e̶d̶,̶ ̶d̶e̶l̶u̶d̶e̶d̶,̶ ̶u̶n̶h̶i̶n̶g̶e̶d̶,̶ ̶p̶a̶r̶a̶n̶o̶i̶d̶,̶ ̶s̶t̶u̶p̶i̶d̶,̶ ̶u̶n̶i̶n̶t̶e̶n̶t̶i̶o̶n̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶h̶i̶l̶a̶r̶i̶o̶u̶s̶,̶ ̶c̶r̶i̶n̶g̶e̶,̶ ̶p̶a̶t̶h̶e̶t̶i̶c̶,̶ ̶g̶r̶a̶n̶d̶s̶t̶a̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶,̶ ̶a̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶r̶l̶a̶t̶a̶n̶,̶ ̶n̶u̶t̶t̶y̶,̶ right all along?
{{Tweet
|image=mtaibbi-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1603857551287730176
|name=Matt Taibbi
|usernameurl=https://x.com/mtaibbi
|username=mtaibbi
|content=8. Federal intelligence and law enforcement reach into Twitter included the Department of Homeland Security, which partnered with security contractors and think tanks to pressure Twitter to moderate content.
|timestamp=8:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022
}}
|timestamp=9:37 PM · Dec 16, 2022
}}
|timestamp=9:45 PM · Dec 16, 2022
}}


=== 2023 ===
=== 2023 ===
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/22465"