You Know You’re in GU When: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:You-Know-Youre-in-GU-When.png|thumb]] | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
'''You know you’re in Geometric Unity when:''' | '''You know you’re in Geometric Unity when:''' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=kg5xYVwN56M}} | {{#widget:YouTube|id=kg5xYVwN56M}} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:04, 12 July 2025
You know you’re in Geometric Unity when:
- you replace the inhomogeneous Lorentz group with the inhomogeneous gauge group (IGGY),
- you spend most of your time on a 14-manifold rather than on a 4-manifold, where the 14-manifold is constructed from the 4-manifold,
- there are no internal symmetry groups,
- the Higgs field comes out of an ad-valued 1-form,
- you begin with a 4-manifold, use it to construct a 14-manifold that behaves like a 3-manifold,
- you take Einstein unified field concept much more seriously than the need to quantize gravity,
- you use the gauge-rotated Levi-Civita connection in what would be the contortion instead of the torsion tensor,
- A mod G is replaced by the double coset of the IGGY by its own tilted subgroup,
- the dark energy term (the cosmological constant times the metric) is replaced by varpi (ad-valued 1-form) minus the epsilon gauge transformation inverted, counterrotating the exterior derivative coupled to the aleph connection applied to the epsilon gauge transformation (this solves cosmological constant problem in GU),
- you actually have predictions about what the remaining matter is to be found and how it would behave if you went to higher and higher groups rather than subgroups,
- your theory is not chiral.
- Eric Weinstein on Curt Jaimungal - Geometric Unity: 40 Years in the Making