Jeffrey Epstein: Difference between revisions
| Line 460: | Line 460: | ||
* [[Anti-Interesting]] | * [[Anti-Interesting]] | ||
* [[Follow the Silence]] | |||
* [[Map the Silences]] | |||
* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]] | |||
* [[Strategic Silence]] | |||
[[Category:Conspiracies]] | [[Category:Conspiracies]] | ||
[[Category:Portal Topicsââ]] | [[Category:Portal Topicsââ]] | ||
[[Category:Peopleââ]] | [[Category:Peopleââ]] | ||
Revision as of 21:51, 11 July 2025
On YouTube
On X
My simple take on conspiracies: Looking at the @AndrewYang @MSNBC series, itâs clear that this is not a repeating accident. However what weâre really worrying about is this. What happens if we start to acknowledge these cryptic power moves? Does the world become Qanon & InfoWars?
If we teach COINTELPRO do we start believing in Reptilians? If we acknowledge the Powell Memo, do we believe in Illuminati next? Does questioning Epsteinâs death and any connection of his to intelligence communities legitimize all of Pizzagate? Does Jean Seberg destroy all news?
Does our suspicion that the Warren Report was used to silence questions around JFK open up the idea that our government is illegitimate when it releases findings?
Sadly, the answer is that weâre falling into 3 types. Conspiracy deniers, Conspiracy nuts & a tiny third group.
The deniers fear legitimizing deep questions & concern about ground truth, interests, power, leverage, cryptic organizations, etc. Better to avoid the slippery slope without near certain evidence they say.
Nuts want hidden order everywhere. They want to be in on a secret world.
The third group (mine) has had it with both of these groups. We know enough to discuss Type I vs Type II error. We donât know whatâs going on most of the time so the nutters make us crazy. We also donât believe that Jeffrey Epsteinâs coverage is normal. We can map irregularity.
We also know we can be wrong & donât think that makes us nutters or dupes. Itâs Type I vs Type II error & we refuse to get all weird because it involves conspiracies. This is a normal thing to think about unless you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about the history of proven conspiracy!
Two of the most important issues at the moment in this space are about the news:
A) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage of Jeffrey Epstein?
B) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage every 4 years of popular candidates outside the system gaining traction?
We know enough to know that something is wildly off in both cases but we donât know exactly what. That makes both the Nutters & the deniers extremely uncomfortable with us. We may be near certain something is off like nutters but reject detailed theories w/o proof like deniers.
My conclusion is simple: consider joining us. If youâve outgrown radical pro-life v pro-choice. If youâre too smart for pure capitalism vs communism. If you canât get the old camps to work for you, consider taking Type I vs II approach to conspiracies. As you would anything else.
I think folks arenât getting at all what Iâm saying. I donât disagree that Epstein was a sociopath. That *was* my read of him. But there was a 2nd layer. A role,mission or job. The two were in conflict. The sociopath just wasnât focused enough on science/trading to play the role. https://t.co/2xMDu6IeIL
For 15 Yrs starting before his Florida conviction, Iâve said that Epstein was a âconstructâ because that sociopath could not have constructed that unnatural role by himself. My guess has been that someone/thing hired a sociopath to play a different one focused on science/trading.
So did he fool me? Perhaps. If he has no connection to any intelligence community, he fooled me. If he really cared about science he fooled me. If he really ran a ccy trading strategy out of Villard house he fooled me. If he was a genius he fooled me. If this wasnât kayfabe..
But intelligence communities do create assets. They do fit them with backstories and characters to play. That is my guess here. And the role that was being played was a badly drawn Gatsby-Bond like character who would never blink. So, am I wrong? Was this bastard state-protected?
Youâll note that Iâm completely agnostic in this theory as to whether the underlying sociopath would commit suicide given the opportunity. Maybe! How would I know? I wouldnât.
What I do know is that if he was playing a role, his character as written would never commit suicide.
What Iâve been trying to focus folks on is that thereâs likely more than one layer here. There was a sick man & a separate role he wasnât fully able to play. Poke at the role: ccy trading, Villard House, IC contacts, associates, tax evasion, etc and see it all come crashing down.
The Jeffrey Epstein I met would NEVER have killed himself. Lots of folks met him. His was a bizarre personality: find me anyone he met who found that personality compatible with a simple suicide.
If JE just hung himself, then the person we met was a character played by an actor. https://t.co/vpeqp2hMkZ
For the record, I donât know that Jeffrey Epstein didnât commit suicide.
What I am confident saying is this:
âJeff Epstein, wasnât a secretive self-made Billionaire hedge fund trading genius who simply just committed suicide w/o any ties to intelligence groups worth reporting.â
I absolutely AM saying that the lack of a vigorous and serious investigation by news media into his reported death and ties to intelligence befitting the severity of this story is essentially *proof* that there is NO functioning press in the United States. We now lack journalism.
A leprechaun said to an elf, âOur news is no longer top shelf, I mean what the âFâ, I donât know that Jeff- rey Epstein just killed himself.â
Said the Elf âI too must complain!
- No one* can locate Ghislaine?
I think that this time Iâll forgo my rhyme: This BS is now very scary.â
This is where I feel quite alone. Most friends in the developed world either close their eyes to our crimes (which are many & awful) or they go self hating & talk about the developed world as evil.
I LOVE the US, UK, AUS, Israel etc w/ eyes wide open for *struggling* to improve. https://x.com/holdenweb/stat/holdenweb/status/1188648675796496384
How great is it that I can tweet like this & still be alive despite openly calling for a second Church Committee to investigate the IC & its relationship to J Epstein for example? I can & do yell âTo hell with the Clintons, NYT & DJT.â
And Iâm still here. I frickinâ love the US.
Let me tell you whatâs totally & absolutely uninteresting: J Epsteinâs ties to the Intelligence Communities.
I commend our papers of record for not stooping to sell papers/win clicks even debunking such wild eyed theories. Ok: back to 24/7 coverage of the breaking slavery story.
BREAKING: Brexit, Rejection of the Lisbon Treaty, Jean Seberg, Andrew Yang, COINTELPRO, and Jeffrey Epsteinâs possible connections to Intelligence Communities may never have happened. Please return home.
[Letâs make this *the* issue. I canât live on a Truman show run by idiots.] https://t.co/nv6snNmVBf
Thatâs the home of my old congregation at Harvard: âWorship & Studyâ. Ugh.
Think about it this way. What would you fund if you wanted to observe & influence a good chunk of the future Jewish leaders within the US establishment? Harvard Hillel! For what was Epstein the front end?
How is this not an intelligence community issue at this point? Do we have no right to know whose asset this was and whether pedophilia was a bug or a feature of the choice to have Jeffrey Epstein play the role of âMysterious mega genius playboy currency traderâ? I still say bug.
Whoever authorized this thing to continue deserves what is coming. But this was probably a program run by a tiny number of people. We need to go after them rather than have them take down general faith in our national security apparatus. Which seems likely as this leaks further..
Letâs make this transparently obvious. What was Jeff Epsteinâs top trade of which anyone is aware?
Did he use prime brokerage? Did he have counterparties? Did he use an execution team? Did he buy execution algos? He claimed to be rich from trading. Ok. Give the best known one.
Iâll wait.
MIT engages in sensitive work. Epstein was acting oddly like a 1-man boutique funding agency after the US stepped away from certain funding.
A) Was Jeffrey Epstein a market genius?
B) If not, what thing X was funding Jeffrey Epstein?
C) Did MIT have a direct relationship to X?
https://x.com/dabeard/status/dabeard/status/1171592125936521216
It really feels to me like the pervert narrative is what brought an enormous covert structure into view and folks are treating it like the main story. But it seems to me that a large infrastructure was fronted by a badly drawn Gatsby character with no plausible source of wealth.
And the money isnât enough. Bill Gates didnât need the money. MIT didnât need dirty money that badly either. Jeffrey Epsteinâs public face was that of someone richer than 11 figures of net worth. And he just wasnât that rich.
Q: For what was Jeffrey Epstein the front end?
Epstein had an enormous secretive office in Midtown. I know because I dropped off trading materials there in 2004 before his Florida arrest brought him to light. If he was a self-made financial genius of supposedly infinite wealth there will be extensive records there. Anyone???
Why are we not focused on his office? Or am I also about to suddenly take my own life, have an unfortunate car accident, or meet a random lunatic for mentioning the obvious? If this is an intelligence operation why are we trusting intelligence to clean it up and investigate it?
Are we counting on MIT to research MIT? The NYT to report on the NYT? The intelligence community to investigate itself? Why is no one calling for a redo of the Church Committee?? This is not a genie that can go back into the bottle. No one can fake records of his trading prowess.
But by all means, do run yet another story on the âLolita Expressâ to âPedophile Islandâ as if thatâs the only story. We are all terrified to discuss the obvious. Follow the money. Where did this Dalton math teacher get so much? Where is the trading record? Money leaves a trail.
People tell me that news has now become commercial and that stories are simply constructed to sell papers/get clicks. This is just nonsense.
Nothing would get clicks, boost circulation or sell papers for a NYT/CNN/NPR like aggressively getting to the bottom of the Epstein story.
As I learned uncovering an immigration conspiracy to use visas to tamper with the free market for STEM labor by our national science complex, no news organization is trying to sell us the actual true stories that move news product organically. The stories we want are held back.
News is a lot like college admissions: itâs an insiders game. We know itâs rigged but canât quite figure out how.
Why take that kid/run that story? Why do you consistently have zero interest in the most interesting kids/stories?
Weâre just now learning *how* rigging works.
Take the current totally synthetic & transparent push for âauthoritative sourcesâ. Such sources would be the ones warning in 2005 that the âGreat Moderationâ was a lie & that a crash loomed. Someone like @nntaleb. Yet they mean the opposite. They mean cheerleaders like @nytimes.
Underrated cryptic tweets that I placed 9 years ago for future use. Unnoticed with *zero* likes in almost a decade.
Yes, our government developed a plan for rounding up people who could contradict the GIN. Thereâs a plan for a coming total collapse of confidence in our system.
The Gated Institutional Narrative or GIN is that which Section A of the reserve index was repurposed to protect. Itâs the false story of us as a country, and right now nobody smart has any idea why we shouldnât call for an independent investigation of the Gated Epstein narrative.
Seriously, you shouldnât believe it from me. If you think the idea of rounding up innocent professors, rich people, labor leaders, newscasters, professionals, etc is nutty....hey so do I. It sounds crazy.
So go search on that string. Tell me how you make out.
Whoâs crazy now?
1/ Long-time followers of this feed will note that I smuggle ideas at times. One of which is that itâs in societyâs best interest to pay certain groups vastly more money, and usually groups that infuriate me. If you look at Jeffrey Epsteinâs stable of scientists you may get why.
2/ Think of the underpaid U.S. research community (particularly theoretical physicists, molecular biologists, ML-experts & top mathematicians) as an unlocked Yellow Bugatti with the motor running and âSteal Meâ painted in red on the front hood, in Mandarin/Farsi/Russian/Arabic...
3/ Epstein offered many scientists ârestorationâ by dangling private planes, exotic locales & FUNDING (probably more than sex) the way colleges at Oxford and Cambridge use cellars and high table. We need to fire our worst researchers & start paying our best at a different scale.
4/ Were I Epstein or whoever created the âJeffrey Epstein Secretive Finacial Genius characterâ, my scientific targets would have partially overlapped his. But Iâd have bought off the entire IAS physics department outright. Those people should all be made very wealthy & happy.
End/ Oddly, Epstein was buying quite good people, but many who were distinguished by being outward facing rather than the quiet introverted types famous within the fields yet all but unknown outside of them. Thatâs a puzzle. Maybe they were the lure to entrap others. Or perhaps..
Like the Drake Equation, I feel we need an Epstein Equation to measure an asymptotically vanishing probability that the official simple story is true w/ each new bizarre development.
Just multiply a lot of small probabilities together to see how fast a product goes toward zero.
#IHaveZeroInterestInComittingSuicide #IDoNotIntendToShutUpAboutEpstein
I will be discussing the Epstein situation. At least thatâs my intention. But anyone can be silenced; I met him & it scared the hell out of me. He was not a financier. Some âthingâ had set him up to play one.
My predictions for what happens next in the Epstein death:
A) Lots of low quality conspiracy theorizing followed by: B) A call for platforms to 'Do something!' to stop A). C) New 'reasons' why G Maxwell and L Wexner can't be made to fill in the details.
This is such bullshit.
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.