Lefty Enervation Packet: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''“Lefty Enervation Packet”''', a concept coined by Eric Weinstein, is the idea of a social script that conditions intellectuals, particularly on the American Left and in the academic/expert class, to dismiss potentially important lines of inquiry using safe, standard responses like:
The '''“Lefty Enervation Packet”''', a concept coined by Eric Weinstein, is the idea of a social script that conditions intellectuals, particularly on the American Left and in the academic/expert class, to dismiss potentially important lines of inquiry using safe, standard responses like:


* “Correlation does not imply causation.
* ''"Correlation does not imply causation."''
* “Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.
* ''"Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence."''
* “Data is not the plural of anecdote.
* ''"Data is not the plural of anecdote."''
* ''"What appears to be coordinated is actually emergent."''
* ''"What appears to be a pattern is generally random."''
* ''"What appears to be doable outside of markets isn’t worth attempting because it can’t be coordinated and/or it is against human nature and/or has too many unintended consequences."''


These statements, while seemingly logically sound in moderation, function like ideological guardrails to:
These statements, while seemingly logically sound in moderation, function like ideological guardrails to:
Line 11: Line 14:
* Prevent individuals from using analytical tools (like data or skepticism) against the institutions to which they belong or by which they are employed.
* Prevent individuals from using analytical tools (like data or skepticism) against the institutions to which they belong or by which they are employed.


Eric compares levels of understanding to layers of counter-intuition:
Eric compares levels of understanding to [[Victor-Victoria Problem|layers of counter-intuition]]:
* First-order counter-intuition sees through naive ideas (e.g., mocking flat-Earth beliefs).
* First-order counter-intuition sees through naive ideas (e.g., mocking flat-Earth beliefs).
* Many stop there, failing to pursue second-order skepticism, which could uncover actual conspiracies (e.g., Iran-Contra, Tuskegee, Twitter files).
* Many stop there, failing to pursue second-order skepticism, which could uncover actual conspiracies (e.g., Iran-Contra, Tuskegee, Twitter files).