Anti-Interesting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Jeff-Epstein-Bill-Clinton.jpg|thumb]] | |||
'''Anti-interesting, adj.''': A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for its investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the [[Gated Institutional Narrative|Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]]. | |||
The concept of "Anti-Interesting," originated by Eric Weinstein, describes phenomena, events, or topics that are inherently fascinating, newsworthy, and potentially of great public interest but are deliberately underreported, ignored, or downplayed by mainstream media and other institutional actors. The essence of the concept lies in the idea that these topics are not simply "uninteresting" but are actively suppressed because they threaten established narratives, powerful institutions, or vested interests. | |||
Weinstein argues that "anti-interesting" subjects often involve significant discrepancies or "failures to close" within the visible world, where the observable facts or events do not align with the narratives presented by media and authorities. These discrepancies suggest the existence of an "invisible world"—forces or agendas working behind the scenes to control what is reported or discussed publicly. | |||
Examples Eric has cited as "anti-interesting" include the lack of media interest in Jeffrey Epstein's wealth origins, "hedge fund" currency trading records and filings, and ties to intelligence, the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic's origins and the role of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak, [[President Joe Bidens Cognitive Decline|President Joe Biden's Cognitive Decline]], and various other significant issues that, despite their potential to captivate the public, are sidelined in public discourse. | |||
In essence, "anti-interesting" highlights the disconnect between what should naturally draw public attention and what is actually allowed to surface in mainstream narratives, pointing to an underlying mechanism of control that dictates the boundaries of acceptable discourse. | |||
<blockquote> | |||
'''''Anti-interesting, adj.''': A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for its investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the [[Gated Institutional Narrative|Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]].'' | |||
'''- Eric Weinstein''' on [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179670802395137 X] | |||
</blockquote> | |||
<blockquote> | |||
''Something is '''anti-interesting''' when it is newsworthy in the extreme and fascinating to consumers of news but the editors show a preternatural disinterest in covering it. “The world has moved on.” “Nobody knows who these people are.” “There’s not enough here.” “Tin Foil Hat story.” '' | |||
'''- Eric Weinstein''' on [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1462468183663595522 X] | |||
</blockquote> | |||
==On YouTube== | |||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=HDLuSjc-f6Q}} | |||
==On X== | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179687340572672}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179687340572672}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1462468183663595522}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179678842933248}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179686220632064}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1233421390029606912}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1257067241914298369}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1257067241914298369}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id= | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1274770155185176576}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1465200664326275072}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1536209509818851329}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1605626608739528705}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1605628449900490754}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1616556159787495425}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1627475762805891073}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1670157696765689856}} | |||
==Related Concepts== | |||
* [[Anechoic Era or Anechoic media]] | |||
* [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)]] | |||
* [[The Invisible World is First Detected by the Visible World's Failure to Close]] | |||
* [[Nothing Burger]] | |||
* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]] | |||
[[ | [[Category:Ericisms]] | ||
[[Category:DISC]] | [[Category:DISC]] |
Latest revision as of 01:39, 20 September 2024
The concept of "Anti-Interesting," originated by Eric Weinstein, describes phenomena, events, or topics that are inherently fascinating, newsworthy, and potentially of great public interest but are deliberately underreported, ignored, or downplayed by mainstream media and other institutional actors. The essence of the concept lies in the idea that these topics are not simply "uninteresting" but are actively suppressed because they threaten established narratives, powerful institutions, or vested interests.
Weinstein argues that "anti-interesting" subjects often involve significant discrepancies or "failures to close" within the visible world, where the observable facts or events do not align with the narratives presented by media and authorities. These discrepancies suggest the existence of an "invisible world"—forces or agendas working behind the scenes to control what is reported or discussed publicly.
Examples Eric has cited as "anti-interesting" include the lack of media interest in Jeffrey Epstein's wealth origins, "hedge fund" currency trading records and filings, and ties to intelligence, the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic's origins and the role of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak, President Joe Biden's Cognitive Decline, and various other significant issues that, despite their potential to captivate the public, are sidelined in public discourse.
In essence, "anti-interesting" highlights the disconnect between what should naturally draw public attention and what is actually allowed to surface in mainstream narratives, pointing to an underlying mechanism of control that dictates the boundaries of acceptable discourse.
Anti-interesting, adj.: A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for its investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
- Eric Weinstein on X
Something is anti-interesting when it is newsworthy in the extreme and fascinating to consumers of news but the editors show a preternatural disinterest in covering it. “The world has moved on.” “Nobody knows who these people are.” “There’s not enough here.” “Tin Foil Hat story.”
- Eric Weinstein on X
On YouTube[edit]
On X[edit]