Ideological Dining a la Carte: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thus a "'''Xenophilic Restrictionist'''" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies. | Thus a "'''Xenophilic Restrictionist'''" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies. | ||
== Related Concepts == | ==Related Concepts== | ||
[[Long-short positions (nuanced positions)]] | [[Long-short positions (nuanced positions)]] | ||
== Other Commentary and Links == | ==See Also== | ||
* [[Camping and Decamping]] | |||
==Other Commentary and Links== | |||
[https://medium.com/@kevinshau/some-thoughts-on-xenophile-restrictionism-717cdd37b36 Medium article: Some thoughts on Xenophile-Restrictionism] | [https://medium.com/@kevinshau/some-thoughts-on-xenophile-restrictionism-717cdd37b36 Medium article: Some thoughts on Xenophile-Restrictionism] |
Revision as of 05:13, 9 August 2024
The concept that you can take parts of different ideologies that you find beneficial without swallowing the whole group of other ideas that typically come along with that ideology.
Eric's go-to for this a "Xenophilic Restrictionist".
A xenophile is a person with intense interest/love for other cultures, this is normally paired with an open borders policy.
Restrictionist in this context is an immigration restrictionist, that is derided as a Xenophobic perspective.
Thus a "Xenophilic Restrictionist" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies.
Related Concepts
Long-short positions (nuanced positions)