Jump to content

Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Gated Institutional Narrative''' is like an exchange, a financial exchange, if you will, except it's an exchange of information and ideas. And in order to actually participate in this particular special conversation, you need to have a seat on the exchange that is you need to write for an important paper, like the Wall Street Journal, or you need to be.
The '''Gated Institutional Narrative''' is like an exchange, a financial exchange, except it's an exchange of information and ideas. And in order to actually participate in this particular special conversation, you need to have a seat on the exchange that is you need to write for an important paper, like the Wall Street Journal, or you need to be a Senator or a Congressman so that you can gain access to the news media, where you need to be sitting at a news desk in any of these situations, whether you're a professor, or a reporter, or a politician if you can gain a seat inside of the Gated Institutional Narrative, you can attempt to converse with other people within that particular conversation.
 
A Senator or a Congressman so that you can gain access to the news media, where you need to be sitting at a news desk in any of these situations, whether you're a professor, or a reporter, or a politician if you can gain a seat inside of the Gated Institutional Narrative, you can attempt to converse with other people within that particular conversation.


The rest of us do not really have the same level or kind of access to this highly rarefied discussion. And I've previously compared this to what we would term a promotion inside of the world of professional wrestling. It's an agreed-upon structure in which people often agree to simulate dispute. Rather than actually have disputes because somebody could get really seriously injured, but they are in fact, working together to produce, an engaging, and regular product for mass-consumption.
The rest of us do not really have the same level or kind of access to this highly rarefied discussion. And I've previously compared this to what we would term a promotion inside of the world of professional wrestling. It's an agreed-upon structure in which people often agree to simulate dispute. Rather than actually have disputes because somebody could get really seriously injured, but they are in fact, working together to produce, an engaging, and regular product for mass-consumption.