|
|
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| * Sewall Wright's theory of adaptive landscapes of fitness | | * Sewall Wright's theory of adaptive landscapes of fitness |
|
| |
|
| | | == [[Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula]] == |
| == Adjective, Occupation, Name == | |
| | |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=955117591378329606}}
| |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == [[Agency]] == | | == [[Agency]] == |
| Line 28: |
Line 24: |
| == Anthropic Capitalism == | | == Anthropic Capitalism == |
| [https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26756 Anthropic Capitalism & the New Gimmick Economy] | | [https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26756 Anthropic Capitalism & the New Gimmick Economy] |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == [[Anti-Expert]] == | | == [[Anti-Expert]] == |
| Line 219: |
Line 214: |
| == [[Potemkin Village]] == | | == [[Potemkin Village]] == |
|
| |
|
| == Preference Falsification == | | == [[Preference Falsification]] == |
| Timur Kuran's theory brought forth in his book Private Truths, Public Lies.
| |
| | |
| Eric contests that the theory of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preference_falsification Preference Falsification] is Intellectual Kryptonite. "Because your theory can be accommodated within the standard theory... the problem is that it is a ready made upgrade to the existing theory in which nothing is lost but new degrees of freedom are gained; and that could have an absolutely unpredictable effect on the entire field because it is at the level of the substrate." [https://youtu.be/xzjqjU2FOwA?t=4023 #4 Prof. Timur Kuran] @ 1:07:03
| |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == Rent-seeking Elites == | | == Rent-seeking Elites == |
| Line 254: |
Line 245: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| == Rough Space == | | == [[Rough Space]] == |
| ''"Rough Space, n: A place to think, joke & observe that is neither safe nor tolerant of abuse."''
| |
| | |
| We now need rough spaces to replace safe ones.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Seberging == | | == Seberging == |
| Line 287: |
Line 275: |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=1195506711290736645}} | | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1195506711290736645}} |
|
| |
|
| == Sharp Minds vs. Sharp Elbows == | | == [[Sharp Minds vs Sharp Elbows]] == |
| | |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=858342790161244160}}
| |
| | |
| '''References:'''
| |
| * [https://art19.com/shows/the-portal/episodes/1b4a34fc-8ee2-489a-af6a-0a996b89d27b 2:16:21 in Podcast Episode 41]
| |
|
| |
|
| == Speaking Fee == | | == Speaking Fee == |
| ''"Speaking Fee, n: 1) Asynchronous Baksheesh received once a politician has left office. 2) (Archaic) A modest honorarium for giving a speech."'' | | ''"Speaking Fee, n: 1) Asynchronous Baksheesh received once a politician has left office. 2) (Archaic) A modest honorarium for giving a speech."'' |
|
| |
|
| | {{#widget:Tweet|id=858342790161244160}} |
|
| |
|
| == Split Level Argument == | | == Split Level Argument == |
| Related to the "Motte-and-Bailey Doctrine". | | Related to the "Motte-and-Bailey Doctrine". |
|
| |
|
| | == [[Steady Hands]] == |
|
| |
|
| == Steady Hands == | | == [[Steel-Manning]] == |
| This originates from Washington D.C.
| |
| | |
| "He has steady hands." You can count on him to do the wrong thing during an emergency to keep everyone on the inside okay Everyone on the inside is super dependent to burn all of their credibility in public
| |
| | |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=508994608185880576}}
| |
| | |
| == Steel-manning ==
| |
| The steel man argument (or steelmanning) is the exact opposite of the straw man argument. The idea is to find the best form of the opponent's argument to test opposing opinions.
| |
| | |
| [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man#steelmanning Steelmanning]
| |
| | |
| | |
| == Teaching Disabilities ==
| |
| Not Learning Disabilities Differential diagnosis
| |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=1169484481369010181}}
| |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=592049989334863872}}
| |
| | |
| == Terms of Service ==
| |
| | |
| '''References:'''
| |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=1071092543536848896}}
| |
| {{#widget:Tweet|id=1071216823742291968}}
| |
| | |
| == Totalizing Ideologies ==
| |
| | |
|
| |
|
| Arendt defines ideologies as concepts of describing the world and people in it, as ‘isms which at least as far as their adherents are concerned, can explain virtually every event and norm in social life by deduction from a single premise. They are worldviews that collapse nuance and contradiction, and simultaneously promise a means of refining and perfecting the world in a fashion that is promised to significantly improve it for its adherents and their progeny. Ideological systems like this are obviously not rare, rather it is the elevating of one such school of thought into a totalitarian movement where the mischief occurs. Seized by such a movement as a templates of a future perfected, an ideological system of belief becomes transformed into a deductive principle of action.
| | == [[Teaching Disabilities]] == |
|
| |
|
| http://necessaryadvocate.com/totalizing-ideologies-on-campus-and-off/
| | == [[Terms of Service]] == |
|
| |
|
| Referenced in https://theportal.wiki/wiki/41:_Douglas_Murray_%E2%80%93_Heroism_2020:_Defense_of_Our_Own_Civilization
| | == [[Totalizing Ideologies]] == |
|
| |
|
| == The Twin Nuclei Problem == | | == The Twin Nuclei Problem == |
