Jeffrey Epstein
Eric Weinstein has repeatedly described Jeffrey Epstein as a likely "intelligence construct" â an artificial persona maintained by intelligence communities for covert operations. Weinstein has made this case through podcast episodes and an extensive multi-year public campaign on X (formerly Twitter), alleging systemic media suppression, intelligence involvement, and institutional failure to investigate Epsteinâs background.
Primary Allegations
Weinstein's central thesis, reiterated across multiple platforms, is that Epstein:
- Was not a real financier and ran no identifiable hedge fund.
- Functioned as a front for intelligence operations with a backstory that cannot withstand scrutiny.
- Operated with impunity due to an unspoken national or transnational "understanding" to avoid probing questions into his finances or intelligence ties.
Weinstein wrote: > âEither he had an enormous fund or he didnât... This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the worldâs largest mega yachtsâŠthat somehow isnât registered or flagged... It leaves no wake.â[1]
On Epstein as a Construct
Weinstein has long argued that Epstein was not acting alone:
- He claims Epstein was âa mall filled with different businessesâ â not just a honeypot for sexual blackmail but also a vector for covert funding and scientific influence[1].
- The âconstructâ hypothesis suggests Epsteinâs character was designed to deflect scrutiny and compartmentalize illicit or intelligence-related functions.
Critique of the Media
Weinstein repeatedly emphasizes the mediaâs failure to investigate the existence (or nonexistence) of Epsteinâs purported financial empire:
Intelligence Community (IC) Involvement
Weinstein suspects Epstein's apparent immunity and mysterious wealth point to intelligence collaboration:
- He repeatedly questions whether Epsteinâs activities were protected under the pretext of âSources & Methodsâ.
- âWhy are our news organizations not asking whether Jeffrey Epstein was a state sponsored Intelligence agent... whose trafficking of little kids was protected as âSources & Methodsâ?â[3]
Moral Argument and Call to Action
Weinstein calls for men, particularly fathers, to demand answers:
- âWhere are the Dads?... We Dads might at least stand together against any nationâs Intelligence Community trafficking children. If we canât do that, I donât know why Dads matter.â[3]
He urges society to prioritize the rights and safety of children over intelligence prerogatives:
- âIf we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we donât have the right to a nation.â[4]
Epistemological Caution
Weinstein frequently clarifies that his position is driven by public evidence and logical inferenceânot inside knowledge:
- âI am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was... I don't actually know about any of those things... I have never claimed that I do.â[2]
Nonetheless, he insists that failing to investigate the inconsistencies is the most damning fact of all.
Call for Oversight and Reform
Weinstein calls for renewed institutional accountability:
- He advocates for a modern reformation of the Church and Pike Committees.
- He has called on the press, Congress, and the public to confront systemic obfuscation by intelligence services and media gatekeepers[5].
Selected Tweets
On YouTube
On X
2019
The âthings I did not fail to predictâ file grew larger.
There were 2 âtradingâ fortunes in NYC Circa â04 that made no sense: Madoff & Epstein. I thought BM was a front runner (I was wrong) and JE a construct (I bet Iâm right). And if JE is an intelligence community construct...
Breaking: Jeffrey Epstein Found Injured in NYC Jail Cell After Possible Suicide Attempt or Assault
My predictions for what happens next in the Epstein death:
A) Lots of low quality conspiracy theorizing followed by:
B) A call for platforms to 'Do something!' to stop A).
C) New 'reasons' why G Maxwell and L Wexner can't be made to fill in the details.
This is such bullshit.
#IHaveZeroInterestInComittingSuicide #IDoNotIntendToShutUpAboutEpstein
I will be discussing the Epstein situation. At least thatâs my intention. But anyone can be silenced; I met him & it scared the hell out of me. He was not a financier. Some âthingâ had set him up to play one.
If you claim Iâm wrong, Iâd like to apologize. Please show me Iâm mistaken by talking in detail where possible about your extensive trading relationship with his accounts. Iâve *never* met those who saw him trade at a level that could explain his outward appearance & Iâve looked.
Like the Drake Equation, I feel we need an Epstein Equation to measure an asymptotically vanishing probability that the official simple story is true w/ each new bizarre development.
Just multiply a lot of small probabilities together to see how fast a product goes toward zero.
1/ Long-time followers of this feed will note that I smuggle ideas at times. One of which is that itâs in societyâs best interest to pay certain groups vastly more money, and usually groups that infuriate me. If you look at Jeffrey Epsteinâs stable of scientists you may get why.
2/ Think of the underpaid U.S. research community (particularly theoretical physicists, molecular biologists, ML-experts & top mathematicians) as an unlocked Yellow Bugatti with the motor running and âSteal Meâ painted in red on the front hood, in Mandarin/Farsi/Russian/Arabic...
3/ Epstein offered many scientists ârestorationâ by dangling private planes, exotic locales & FUNDING (probably more than sex) the way colleges at Oxford and Cambridge use cellars and high table. We need to fire our worst researchers & start paying our best at a different scale.
4/ Were I Epstein or whoever created the âJeffrey Epstein Secretive Finacial Genius characterâ, my scientific targets would have partially overlapped his. But Iâd have bought off the entire IAS physics department outright. Those people should all be made very wealthy & happy.
End/ Oddly, Epstein was buying quite good people, but many who were distinguished by being outward facing rather than the quiet introverted types famous within the fields yet all but unknown outside of them. Thatâs a puzzle. Maybe they were the lure to entrap others. Or perhaps..
Underrated cryptic tweets that I placed 9 years ago for future use. Unnoticed with *zero* likes in almost a decade.
Yes, our government developed a plan for rounding up people who could contradict the GIN. Thereâs a plan for a coming total collapse of confidence in our system.
The Gated Institutional Narrative or GIN is that which Section A of the reserve index was repurposed to protect. Itâs the false story of us as a country, and right now nobody smart has any idea why we shouldnât call for an independent investigation of the Gated Epstein narrative.
Seriously, you shouldnât believe it from me. If you think the idea of rounding up innocent professors, rich people, labor leaders, newscasters, professionals, etc is nutty....hey so do I. It sounds crazy.
So go search on that string. Tell me how you make out.
Whoâs crazy now?
I know of no truly working profession.
Medicine: broken. Law: broken. Research: broken. Banking: broken. Mgmt consulting: broken.
Youâll say âSTEM, Tech and CS FTW losers!! Woot!!â
And Iâll whisper âBro, thou dost protest way way too much.â Me thinks.
How are we still such a rich country, then? Apparently having every institution in the country be "broken" isn't that catastrophic??
I didnât know you did impressions! Not really sure. Guessing Timothy Geithner explaining the great moderation of pre-2007? Marty Feldstein on laissez faire? Greenspan on self correcting markets? Brad Delong on NAFTA? Madoff on investing? Krugman on internet commerce? I give. Who?
Câmon Noah. Enough.
Enough of what?
Okay Noah. Everything is fine. The professions are working. We are a rich country. Epstein committed suicide. Trump is a pendulum swing.
Whatever.
Whoever you may be, you are *starting* to lose even Shermer. What does that leave us with? An uninhabitable Gated Institutional Narrative abandoned by all?
The easiest thing in the world is to redo the Church & Pike Committees.
#BackToChurch. Donât send the FBI to investigate.
2 cameras outside Epstein's jail cell both broken. Ok I'm now skeptical of the suicide story. No positive evidence of who murdered him or how & suicide is still on the table but this is very fishy. If Ghislaine Maxwell disappears/commits suicide=conspiracy https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras/fbi-studies-two-broken-cameras-outside-cell-where-epstein-died-source-idUSKCN1VI2LC/
Â
It could still be suicide. But it can no longer be reported as âSince Jeffrey Epsteinâs jail cell suicide...â with no call to rapidly protect everyone directly connected to the story and investigate the intelligence communities for possible involvement.
People tell me that news has now become commercial and that stories are simply constructed to sell papers/get clicks. This is just nonsense.
Nothing would get clicks, boost circulation or sell papers for a NYT/CNN/NPR like aggressively getting to the bottom of the Epstein story.
As I learned uncovering an immigration conspiracy to use visas to tamper with the free market for STEM labor by our national science complex, no news organization is trying to sell us the actual true stories that move news product organically. The stories we want are held back.
News is a lot like college admissions: itâs an insiders game. We know itâs rigged but canât quite figure out how.
Why take that kid/run that story? Why do you consistently have zero interest in the most interesting kids/stories?
Weâre just now learning *how* rigging works.
Take the current totally synthetic & transparent push for âauthoritative sourcesâ. Such sources would be the ones warning in 2005 that the âGreat Moderationâ was a lie & that a crash loomed. Someone like @nntaleb. Yet they mean the opposite. They mean cheerleaders like @nytimes.
The world seems determined to take away the most counterproductive interpretations from the sordid Epstein situation. This is an important point made by @wolfejosh.
That said, the number of shady fortunes that have been rehabilitated by University giving is rather formidable.
Hereâs an interesting, UNINTENDED thing
If philanthropy + named buildings get seen (see the Steinardt part of this thread) as MOTIVATED by whitewashing a rep
Then big giving by good people may become TABOO
as it may backfire suggesting the GIVING is done to assuage MISGIVINGS
A load bearing man was knocked out & an enormous human infrastructure has been crumbling as a result. What that complex really was isnât yet understood. Keep in mind our universities became increasingly hostile to mavericks, partially explaining this creepy dependence on Epstein.
Today Joichi Ito resigned from The New York Times Company Board of Directors, effective immediately.
What do I believe? That there was no âJeffrey Epsteinâ as we know him. There never was.
What we called Jeffrey Epstein was likely a fusion of an actor and a character, both with the name Jeffrey Epstein (a la Colbert). And whoever chose the actor to play the role likely goofed.
Lastly, I think that the authors of the preposterous character know that this was too big, too dumb and too public. It wonât stay hidden. Silencing everyone is not an option. Wrongdoing will have to be eventually admitted to save the thing that the complex was designed to serve.
The idea was to make a huge bet that everyone would remember when it became clear. Everyone in the Edge world asked âWhat do you mean heâs a construct?!â Thus they will all remember this theory. This was a badly written character resembling no financial trading genius In history.
What in the world are you rambling about here? Try telling the "no Jeffrey Epstein" theory to the young women he abused.
In my theory, the actor Jeffrey Epstein was a real person. A math teacher chosen to play a role. The things the actor did as the character are real physical acts. You are not getting what Iâm suggesting if thatâs your take. Sorry.
I get what you're saying. The way you're saying it is overly structured and tone deaf. Case in point: Jeffrey Epstein was a real person outside of your theory. That fact does not reside "in" your theory. Not sure why "math teacher" is more real than "hedge fund manager."
Because I believe he taught math at Dalton. I think thatâs a thing that happened. I donât believe he ran a wildly successful trading operation out of secretive offices in midtown Manhattan. That isnât a real thing. In my theory: that didnât happen. It wasnât real.
Fair enough. I'm not sure who believes he ran a successful trading operation. There's no supporting public evidence.
Well then you are not buying the official story either. Because thatâs what he told me he did. I dropped off material at that super secret office where the trading supposedly happened. Thanks. Gotta switch gears. Hope that clarified a bit.
MIT engages in sensitive work. Epstein was acting oddly like a 1-man boutique funding agency after the US stepped away from certain funding.
A) Was Jeffrey Epstein a market genius?
B) If not, what thing X was funding Jeffrey Epstein?
C) Did MIT have a direct relationship to X? https://x.com/dabeard/status/dabeard/status/1171592125936521216
It really feels to me like the pervert narrative is what brought an enormous covert structure into view and folks are treating it like the main story. But it seems to me that a large infrastructure was fronted by a badly drawn Gatsby character with no plausible source of wealth.
And the money isnât enough. Bill Gates didnât need the money. MIT didnât need dirty money that badly either. Jeffrey Epsteinâs public face was that of someone richer than 11 figures of net worth. And he just wasnât that rich.
Q: For what was Jeffrey Epstein the front end?
Epstein had an enormous secretive office in Midtown. I know because I dropped off trading materials there in 2004 before his Florida arrest brought him to light. If he was a self-made financial genius of supposedly infinite wealth there will be extensive records there. Anyone???
Why are we not focused on his office? Or am I also about to suddenly take my own life, have an unfortunate car accident, or meet a random lunatic for mentioning the obvious? If this is an intelligence operation why are we trusting intelligence to clean it up and investigate it?
Are we counting on MIT to research MIT? The NYT to report on the NYT? The intelligence community to investigate itself? Why is no one calling for a redo of the Church Committee?? This is not a genie that can go back into the bottle. No one can fake records of his trading prowess.
But by all means, do run yet another story on the âLolita Expressâ to âPedophile Islandâ as if thatâs the only story. We are all terrified to discuss the obvious. Follow the money. Where did this Dalton math teacher get so much? Where is the trading record? Money leaves a trail.
Letâs make this transparently obvious. What was Jeff Epsteinâs top trade of which anyone is aware?
Did he use prime brokerage? Did he have counterparties? Did he use an execution team? Did he buy execution algos? He claimed to be rich from trading. Ok. Give the best known one.
Iâll wait.
We have fused a convent with a bordello and now we canât separate them. The bordello needs a convent for respectability. The convent needs a bordello for resources. These houses divided will not stand until we refactor our institutions.
The problem is us. This is who we became.
The modern US research university is built on the steepest E.G.O. (embedded growth obligation) of any major sector. Itâs a pyramid scheme careening out of control with Boomers at the helm of all of the top ones as they have been hooked up for inter-generational wealth transfer.
Itâs time for the failed generations (Boomers & Silents) to leave and the untested (GenXers & Millenials) to get to work cleaning up this unholy mess after a pair of failed generations.
The Epstein cover up is the Hill that our Institutional class wishes to die on?
Ok. #SoBeIt
This is going to keep happening. Plot any metric you like. They all tell a single story:
Should @SamHarrisOrg & I talk about the Boomers and their original & bold approach to stewardship of education, research and our world class universities?
How about how Student Debt was reclassified in 2005 to keep kids from fleeing this experimental approach through bankruptcy?
I donât actually like saying this, but there is no way out. The United States research enterprise cannot afford this generational effect turning our research enterprise into a giant wealth transfer program. This generation has to lose ill gotten gains:
As we know, University costs have skyrocketed above inflation. Administrator ranks have ballooned. Student Debt has become non-dischargeable. Adjunct & Student labor have exploded. ETC.
Turns out, there's really only one generation at the helm now steering us into this iceberg:
Â
Thatâs the home of my old congregation at Harvard: âWorship & Studyâ. Ugh.
Think about it this way. What would you fund if you wanted to observe & influence a good chunk of the future Jewish leaders within the US establishment? Harvard Hillel! For what was Epstein the front end?
How is this not an intelligence community issue at this point? Do we have no right to know whose asset this was and whether pedophilia was a bug or a feature of the choice to have Jeffrey Epstein play the role of âMysterious mega genius playboy currency traderâ? I still say bug.
Whoever authorized this thing to continue deserves what is coming. But this was probably a program run by a tiny number of people. We need to go after them rather than have them take down general faith in our national security apparatus. Which seems likely as this leaks further..
Trying to build a haystack to hide the Space Needle?
We stumble on a gigantic program w synapses connecting the UK royal family, Harvard/MIT/Stanford, Bill Gates, Kompromat, Robert Maxwellâs kid, POTUSes...and there are 1000s???
The NYT is now OJ looking for the âreal killers.â
It's good to see the outrage at Jeffey Epstein. But there are thousands more Jeffrey Epsteins out there, and tens of thousands of victims. So here's how we can channel our anger to make a difference. My Sunday column, just posted: https://nyti.ms/2LuQK5S
In pretending this is mostly about a single wealthy sex offender attended by a never ending series of miraculous coincidences of ever escalating improbability, this is no longer the elephant in the living room. This is the rotting Blue Whale at the US national thanksgiving table.
Do you remember when JFK took his own life in Dealy Plaza? No?
Well thatâs how this reads to me.
This never was a self-made currency-trading genius billionaire. Almost certainly, this was a huge program. And someone fââd it up by hiring Jeffery Epstein as its face & front end.
Let me tell you whatâs totally & absolutely uninteresting: J Epsteinâs ties to the Intelligence Communities.
I commend our papers of record for not stooping to sell papers/win clicks even debunking such wild eyed theories. Ok: back to 24/7 coverage of the breaking slavery story.
BREAKING: Brexit, Rejection of the Lisbon Treaty, Jean Seberg, Andrew Yang, COINTELPRO, and Jeffrey Epsteinâs possible connections to Intelligence Communities may never have happened. Please return home.
[Letâs make this *the* issue. I canât live on a Truman show run by idiots.]
This is where I feel quite alone. Most friends in the developed world either close their eyes to our crimes (which are many & awful) or they go self hating & talk about the developed world as evil.
I LOVE the US, UK, AUS, Israel etc w/ eyes wide open for *struggling* to improve. https://x.com/holdenweb/stat/holdenweb/status/1188648675796496384
A second church committee? And here I thought you're Jewish!
@WhlBarrowTestes We have to go #BackToChurch if we are going to find out why Jeffrey Epstein was untouchable for so many years and how he came to leave the scene. Amen brother.
So when you say it, it isn't crazy? Got it.
Why not try....journalism? Ask questions:
A) Where are all Epstein's closest associates?
B) Where are the trading records?
C) What was the non-bullshit source of his wealth?
D) What is his relationship to US & Foreign intelligence.
Breaking: Jeffrey Epsteinâs autopsy âpoints to homicide,â pathologist claims https://nyti.ms/36m7Bk2
A leprechaun said to an elf,
âOur news is no longer top shelf,
I mean what the âFâ,
I donât know that Jeff-
rey Epstein just killed himself.â
Said the Elf âI too must complain!
*No one* can locate Ghislaine?
I think that this time
Iâll forgo my rhyme:
This BS is now very scary.â
For the record, I donât know that Jeffrey Epstein didnât commit suicide.
What I am confident saying is this:
âJeff Epstein, wasnât a secretive self-made Billionaire hedge fund trading genius who simply just committed suicide w/o any ties to intelligence groups worth reporting.â
I absolutely AM saying that the lack of a vigorous and serious investigation by news media into his reported death and ties to intelligence befitting the severity of this story is essentially *proof* that there is NO functioning press in the United States. We now lack journalism.
The Jeffrey Epstein I met would NEVER have killed himself. Lots of folks met him. His was a bizarre personality: find me anyone he met who found that personality compatible with a simple suicide.
If JE just hung himself, then the person we met was a character played by an actor. https://x.com/pdugov/status/1193260390874046465
@reasonvalues It wasnât about a beautiful life. He held the world in a kind of bemused contempt. He treated himself as divorced from other humans and their petty concerns.
@Rjt98 That is sort of my point. Normal people are referenced to other people. They feel shame, concern, fear, closeness, expulsion etc at a visceral level. This wasnât a normal presentation. It didnât look like a normal person. It looked like an act.
I think folks arenât getting at all what Iâm saying. I donât disagree that Epstein was a sociopath. That *was* my read of him. But there was a 2nd layer. A role,mission or job. The two were in conflict. The sociopath just wasnât focused enough on science/trading to play the role.
For 15 Yrs starting before his Florida conviction, Iâve said that Epstein was a âconstructâ because that sociopath could not have constructed that unnatural role by himself. My guess has been that someone/thing hired a sociopath to play a different one focused on science/trading.
So did he fool me? Perhaps. If he has no connection to any intelligence community, he fooled me. If he really cared about science he fooled me. If he really ran a ccy trading strategy out of Villard house he fooled me. If he was a genius he fooled me. If this wasnât kayfabe..
But intelligence communities do create assets. They do fit them with backstories and characters to play. That is my guess here. And the role that was being played was a badly drawn Gatsby-Bond like character who would never blink. So, am I wrong? Was this bastard state-protected?
Youâll note that Iâm completely agnostic in this theory as to whether the underlying sociopath would commit suicide given the opportunity. Maybe! How would I know? I wouldnât.
What I do know is that if he was playing a role, his character as written would never commit suicide.
What Iâve been trying to focus folks on is that thereâs likely more than one layer here. There was a sick man & a separate role he wasnât fully able to play. Poke at the role: ccy trading, Villard House, IC contacts, associates, tax evasion, etc and see it all come crashing down.
Oh I think itâs much more diabolical than that often. Hereâs how the game is now played. If a person has a *totally* SOLID story that runs counter-narrative to MSM thereâs NO MSM invitation. The story thus âbreaksâ on conservative Media. Then Lefties cry: âOMG: THEY WENT ON FOX!â
Just heard @kittypurrzog tell your brother @BretWeinstein on his podcast that she is only invited to appear on/be a guest on heterodox/right leaning outlets and that @MSNBC and other lefty sites/orgs wonât give her a platform.
You are seeing Fox-Breitbart-ProjectVeritas break pivotal stories that had been handed to NYT/NPR-CNN. As in the Epstein hot mic thereâs a layer above reporters thatâs repeatedly killing huge important stories. Why? So they can be discredited by the outlet where they must appear!
Think about how many times youâve heard someone say: âOh, I bet you heard that on @fox, @BreitbartNews, @Project_Veritas. You canât trust ANYTHING that runs there. Youâve been had. Hahaha.â
Itâs such a brilliant gambit. But what makes it work is that MSM must stay all but mute.
1/ WE NEED A NEW CHURCH COMMITTEE: Fred Hampton Edition.
Today is the 50th anniversary of the US assassination of our own citizen Fred Hampton, inventor of the Rainbow Coalition. This year is the 40th anniversary of our killing of Jean Seberg via the FBI direction of our Press.
Â
Â
Â
Â
2/ With the inexplicable âPerfect Stormâ death of Jeffrey Epstein & likely govt direction of our corporate press not to seek categorical denial of our intelligence community w regard to ANY link to Jeffrey Epsteinâs pedophilia & traffic in minors, we MUST investigate our own IC.
3/ We would never have learned about our own Government crimes against MLK Jr, Dick Gregory, Jean Seberg, Fred Hampton & others if we the people were not in control of our permanent Government class.
Without investigation, the people are no longer in control of our Govenrment.
4/ Whatâs the emergency? Itâs the silence & bizarre behavior around Epstein:
Q1: Ghislaine Maxwell has a passport. Where and when was it last recorded and why is this of interest to no corporate media?
Q2: Where is the categorical denial or refusal to comment on IC ties to JE?
5/ Q3: Prince Andrewâs interview is close to the most bizarre thing Iâve ever seen on video. Those questions were all expected. What was that?
Fred Hampton reminds us that our permanent class in Govât can kill extrajudicially. Jean Seberg reminds us it uses our press against us.
6/ Learn to listen for the âsounds of silenceâ. Silence around @AndrewYang and @TulsiGabbard. Silence around Ghislaine. Silence around Epsteinâs Villard House office in NYC and trading records. Silence around IC ties. And silence around the Church & Pike Committees. #BackToChurch
End/ Iâm calling on @AndrewYang, @BernieSanders, @TulsiGabbard & other Mavericks to LEAD the charge asking about the silence reaching epidemic proportions. Itâs time to investigate ourselves which has always been A NORMAL PART OF DEMOCRACY. It has nothing to do w tinfoil đ©s.đ
Â
Keep the coincidences coming!
And what is of course most uninteresting of all to Journalists is pursuing categorical denial from intelligence agencies that Jeffrey Epstein was tied to any intelligence service and/or the last known sighting of Ms G Maxwell and her passport(s)...
Weeks before Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide, he suffered neck injuries in the cell he shared with another man. Video footage of the incident is nowhere to be found. http://huffp.st/21iucL4
2020
My simple take on conspiracies: Looking at the @AndrewYang @MSNBC series, itâs clear that this is not a repeating accident. However what weâre really worrying about is this. What happens if we start to acknowledge these cryptic power moves? Does the world become Qanon & InfoWars?
If we teach COINTELPRO do we start believing in Reptilians? If we acknowledge the Powell Memo, do we believe in Illuminati next? Does questioning Epsteinâs death and any connection of his to intelligence communities legitimize all of Pizzagate? Does Jean Seberg destroy all news?
Does our suspicion that the Warren Report was used to silence questions around JFK open up the idea that our government is illegitimate when it releases findings?
Sadly, the answer is that weâre falling into 3 types. Conspiracy deniers, Conspricay nuts & a tiny third group.
The deniers fear legitimizing deep questions & concern about ground truth, interests, power, leverage, cryptic organizations, etc. Better to avoid the slippery slope without near certain evidence they say.
Nuts want hidden order everywhere. They want to be in on a secret world.
The third group (mine) has had it with both of these groups. We know enough to discuss Type I vs Type II error. We donât know whatâs going on most of the time so the nutters make us crazy. We also donât believe that Jeffrey Epsteinâs coverage is normal. We can map irregularity.
We also know we can be wrong & donât think that makes us nutters or dupes. Itâs Type I vs Type II error & we refuse to get all weird because it involves conspiracies. This is a normal thing to think about unless you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about the history of proven conspiracy!
Two of the most important issues at the moment in this space are about the news:
A) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage of Jeffrey Epstein?
B) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage every 4 years of popular candidates outside the system gaining traction?
We know enough to know that something is wildly off in both cases but we donât know exactly what. That makes both the Nutters & the deniers extremely uncomfortable with us. We may be near certain something is off like nutters but reject detailed theories w/o proof like deniers.
My conclusion is simple: consider joining us. If youâve outgrown radical pro-life v pro-choice. If youâre too smart for pure capitalism vs communism. If you canât get the old camps to work for you, consider taking Type I vs II approach to conspiracies. As you would anything else.
Would you look at that.
BREAKING: Virgin Islands allege Jeffrey Epstein trafficked girls as young as 11 as recently as 2018 https://miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article239319168.html
The digital layer allows us to measure the market demand for many genuinely fascinating topics in which the legacy journalism layer pretends to take zero interest.
Odd. Guaranteed markets on real topics. Zero interest. Ownership of media by interests who do not need profit.
The digital layer allows us to to see reporters following people they never acknowledge even exist.
Who really cares? Why does it matter? Because institutions agree never to treat as real that which remains confined to the digital layer alone. Hence the reason weâve stagnated.
Iâd like to know where the âlast known whereabouts of Ghislaine Maxwellâ and âlocation of Epstein trading records from Villard Houseâ and âties to intelligenceâ investigations are stalled out. Even where these stories ran into brick walls would be fascinating. Where is the DISC?
Where are we on State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots?
Letâs try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasnât behind Epstein if we canât ask the question of Epsteinâs ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole.
Why is that anti-interesting? Wouldnât we want to be sure that Epsteinâs fortune didnât come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didnât and arenât reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us.
Pursue this even further: if news desks arenât asking these questions, arenât they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they arenât willing to *ask* Qs?
Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase âNo Commentâ is familiar to anyone my age from this time.
Where is that phrase?
It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions.
Listen carefully: you donât have to elect Biden or Trump.
The world has woken up via being suddenly shut in doors by crazy incompetent people largely born in the 1940s and 1950s without a coherent explanation. Or plan.
Lives lost. Nurses sacrificed. Jobs & businesses destroyed.
You donât have to take these choices. *Nobody* smart wants these people except to defeat each other. You donât really like Fox. Or CNN. Or the NYT. Except when they go after your enemies.
Okay. So go cold turkey. Call them all what they are: The UnWorkables.
You would be better off with a thoughtful and competent 45 year old electrician or self made businessperson as president. Almost no ordinary people have family business interests in China or Ukraine. Chose anyone without dementia. Pick someone who canât remember the moon landing.
Pick someone who never met Jeffrey Epstein. Pick someone who can code or with a masters degree or better in STEM.
You donât have to keep picking the card the magician is forcing you to select as your card. Itâs not YOUR card. Itâs the magicianâs card. Grab the magicians wrist.
That card says âBidenâ. Take that card and a lighter and set it on fire. Then grab the deck and pick another card, rifle it to check for markings on the back, look to see if they all say Biden, and chose a different card at random. This was never a primary. There was no election.
If the enormous generation of you young folk canât use this mismanagement of a pandemic by a bipartisan kleptocratic gerontocracy, then you arenât thinking like young folk at all. Demand your debt free future and the removal of this preposterous class of ancient legacy predators.
Learned helplessness is UnAmerican. This is like China or Russia controlling our minds from a bad sci-fi thriller. But we are being controlled by our grandparents and parents instead. And they donât care.
This is beyond insane and it has never been like this. Ever.
Rant over.
Everyone focused on trying to get me and @EpsilonTheory to talk to each other on Epstein, collapse, markets and other topics, can now lay off. It has just happened.
[Good call on your part planet đ btw. Much as I hate to admit it...]
I donât think that is where this is. I have no inside scoop and am not a general Clinton Body Count guy.
There is some structure around Epstein that all of us civilians are endangered by. Some piece of a dark world spilled into all of our lives. And many eyes are watching.
Jeffrey Epstein: coincidence magnet.
The âfair coinâ that comes up tails every time. Because no one wants to be labeled a conspiracy theorist.
As a Mathematician I can say that this IS statistically possible. As a human, I would say donât listen to me as a mathematician here... https://x.com/PalmerReport/s/PalmerReport/status/1285063675221606400
I predict an escalating series of tragic spectacular coincidences surrounding Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell, our press, our wealthy and our intelligence communities.
Because Quantum Mechanics! Or because Black Lives Matter!! Or Something. Yep. Must be quantum or racism...
We must know what specific unit was behind the construct that was âJeffrey Epstein, financierâ and who authorized his construction.
We are always looking for a word. In 1971 that word was âCOINTELPROâ.
What is that word in 2020? If you know this word, get it to @jkbjournalist.
BREAKING NEWS: Federal judge begins process of unsealing documents in the defamation case of Ghislaine Maxwell. Some names of non-parties will be redacted.
@VicBergerIV Uh, first of all I donât think weâve met and pretending that I am âgushingâ about someone is not a good introduction. It makes me think ânot good faithâ given that Cernovich has said horrendous things in the past which we have called wretched and worse. Iâd take this up with him.
@VicBergerIV As for this case, Iâm not really interested in Epstein/Ghislaine and company. I want to know whether my country was involved in state protected trafficking in minors & why our press refuses generally to do journalism in this case. Grateful to all doing the work to settle this.
@VicBergerIV If you have answers and know more about it, go for it. I personally am terrified that we have a gentlemanâs agreement not to ask whether this is tied to the intelligence community and I appreciate those trying to find out the truth given the stakes. I donât have more background.
@VicBergerIV âHeavily promotesâ?? Thatâs enough lying from one account. I tried. Never have I heavily promoted Mike Cernovich. Be well. Blocked.
2021
Normally I would think that our interests would be best served by self-investigation of the IC through redoing the Church/Pike Committees.
But given the hands closing around the throat of free unsurveiled action and open idea exchange, pardoning Assange and Snowden makes sense.
Or more simply put: if our bizarre press and elected representatives refuse to ASK about Jeffrey Epsteinâs links to the Intelligence world, what choice do we have but pardoning those who do the work abdicated by government & the press while they cowardly refuse to do their jobs?
I should also say that the problem isnât as simple as Assange & Snowden. Assume for the moment that they both acted in a principled fashion and did so with great care. Youâd still have the issue that pardons send a signal to less principled actors which could be catastrophic.
We need an intelligence community we can trust to *not* be open. That is the conundrum we face. How do we gain oversight and protect ourselves against a secret world that we want to remain opaque?
This is a giant liability of not being able to rest on a shared national culture.
A weird way to describe String Theory, Neoclassical Economics, Critical Theory, The Neo-Darwinian Synthesis, Public Health, Trust & Safety, Mainstream Media, The Fed, Peer Review, The Great Moderation, Cancel Culture and Political Polling...but ya know what? Heâs right. It works!
Evidence you might be in a Cult::
When you stop thinking for yourself and youâve empowered a select few others in your group to do your thinking for you.
Student Debt, PATRIOT Act, Diversity & Inclusion Oaths, Rollback of Mandatory Requirement, Epstein Suicide, Andrew Yang primary coverage, 1619 Project, Coordinated Bans by Tech Platforms, University Tuition Hike Explanations, STEM worker shortages despite wage mechanism..
#GOLD!
You *can* trust newspapers & national news organizations that have aggressively followed up on finding the trading records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs Multi-Billion dollar hedge fund located in Villard House & have directly asked about his ties to the intelligence communities.
Â
Note the totally regular pattern. Our authorities synonymize the Wuhan Lab origin with a synthetically engineered virus and deny this.
Yet, the idea of lab accelerated natural selection is *never* engaged. Then their conclusion is that COVID must therefore have a natural origin.
I'm an expert advisor to the @WHO & progressive. I believe the organization is absolutely essential. I support @DrTedros. But WHO #COVID19 investigators were 100% wrong to say that we should not actively examine all pandemic origin hypotheses, including an accidental lab leak.
Who is this designed to fool? Why the pressure never to engage the competent version of the Wuhan Lab Leak? Why demonize the competent?
This is obvious war on reputations of smart competent truthful folks who ask the question media will not: is this lab accelerated selection?
If there is a conclusive argument against lab accelerated natural selection letâs hear that specifically.
This is like the Epstein situation. An entire planet is asked to believe that no press want to ask the most obvious questions. Why does anyone believe this?!? Does anyone???
One simple question: what rules out lab accelerated natural selection as an origin?
Thatâs it. Will anyone ask this question? If not, why not?
Iâll take my answer off the air and wait for the claims of âconspiracy theoryâ from the farms of minor accounts.
Honest question: who are the *deep* critics of our establishment and institutions that the establishment and institutions *are* taking seriously?
Letâs assume Iâm worried about Davos. Or media refusal to ask obvious questions about Epstein. Who are you listening to on that?
Kennedy Jr is a menace.
â[Fauci] is a very sinister guy who has turned this country over to Big Pharma.â -- @RobertKennedyJr on The Laura Ingraham Show. Listen to my full interview with Robert by subscribing to @QuakeMedia today: http://quakemedia.com/laura
Â
The issue with Kennedy Jr isnât his criticism of Big Pharma or leaders of the medical community. Skepticism is often good. The issue is his years of shoddy and mendacious âscholarshipâ that has impacted lives negatively.
Ok. Take that as you state it.
Many of us are worried about the Great Reset & Davos. Or why the press wonât ask questions about accelerated natural selection in the Wuhan Lab. Or about Epstein & intelligence or where his hedge fund records are. Who are you listening to on those?
Are you asking me or your followers? Either way, to whom do you recommend we listen? I agree all of those topics are worthy of further coverage and scrutiny.
Iâm, somewhat unfairly, asking you. Iâd be happy to ask privately. My DMs are open.
Iâm concerned that JE was never a hedge fund manager and that no one in traditional media is trying to find his hedge fund trading records/filings or asking about ties to intelligence community.
Iâd recommend listening to @BretWeinstein on accelerated natural selection of the virus but to talk to virologists about the difference between an engineered synthetic virus & merely directing selection inside a lab. Media deals with the former only to discredit lab leak theory.
On the secret immigration act of 1990 & H-1B history, I can give you the backstory. But Michael Teitelbaum and Prof. Norman Matloff would be excellent sources once you know the reason the NSF flooded our markets leading to staffing our STEM research labs with Chinese nationals.
I truly appreciate @jaketapper for engaging me on Twitter. I have suggested we switch to DMs. He has engaged. The conversation is now private at my request and not his.
Thank you Jake. I admire this and it is all too rare. There is no gotcha.
End.
Thanks for the invitation. I can try to explain my concern.
There really *is* a problem w MAGA, Trump, Qanon & conspiracy theories running rampant. And it will result in death & destruction if it spins out of control.
However it is being fueled by those who claim to fight it.
The entire war over fact checking is a war of 2 low resolution teams.
One team wants absolute freedom to spread wild eyed theories that just about everything is a psyop or a false flag.
The other team wants to impose institutional consensus reality on everyone via media & tech.
Unfortunately, I canât live under either. So each of the warring parties thinks Iâm against them & for the other team. In their mentalities if you arenât on their simplistic team you are, de facto, working for the other side. Thereâs no basic concept of *responsible* heterodoxy.
No the Freemasons do not run everything on behalf of pedophile reptilians who faked Sandy Hook with crisis actors.
Yes there are/were conspiracies behind Epstein, H1B, @MSNBC, PPE, climate science, the âGreat Moderationâ, Great Reset...everywhere institutions want a âconsensusâ.
Having spent a good portion of my 20s at Harvard, I know *exactly* how this game works. Our betters sit down and try to figure out how to control others behind closed doors. They see themselves as the intrinsically enlightened people who need to do the thinking for all of us.
When they wanted to cut our Social Security payments & raise our taxes they opted to try to change the CPI rather than pass legislation. When they wanted to pay less for scientists they knew to keep *silent* about NSF Labor Shortage claims even though such shortages donât exist.
These are the folks who tell you âmasks donât workâ rather than âsave masks for doctors as we forgot to restock them and moved all manufacturing to China like moronsâ. They will then spin on a dime to tell you âOnly bad dumb people donât wear masksâ. This is the worst of Harvard.
So I donât want Alex Jones and Qanon nor do I want @TwitterSafety, @msnbc and @Harvard. I see them as very different forms of the same thing: people who want to take away our ability to see clearly.
And, I assure you, @Harvard tries to paint anyone it canât control as dangerous.
So, my belief is that anyone who rejects/questions Davos, Consensus Reality, Institutional Narrative, Public Health Campaigns, High Immigration, Peer Review, Primary Election Coverage, Trust & Safety...will be treated as Alex Jones sooner or Later.
This is Managed Reality âą.
I cannot live in Managed Reality âą because I think it defeats the purpose of being a human being. It negates being an American. It abdicates responsibility for our children.
I have defeated Harvard about half the times we have fought. How? Because they just arenât that good.
Managed Reality âą has a weak spot. Itâs not run by our A-team anymore. Fauci isnât Francis Crick. Biden isnât Elon. Janet Yellen isnât Satoshi.
In general, the A-Team is going independent because tech/media/Ed are enforcing way too much conformity through personal destruction.
So why am I worried?
Well, Iâve been trying to save the institutions. Itâs probably doomed, but almost no one is trying to do what I do: rescue the institutions from their death spiral by reinserting their critics in positions of prominence (eg Chomsky at MIT).
Hence my fear.
If I were a tech guy Iâd retreat into wealth. If I were a professor Iâd shut up and collect my salary with job security. If I was a politician or journalist Iâd follow the other sheep.
But Iâm a science guy, an American and a dad. And I want my kids to have a particular future.
Thanks.
Actually...We both are. Maybe you arenât getting that. Your strategy is skepticism. Mine a hybrid.
I just recorded my first podcast interview in some time. Would be delighted to have that conversation as it would be more effective if people saw our two different approaches.
But I was moved when I saw you move off the official story of Jeffrey Epstein. It got too preposterous for even Michael Shermer!
We need to show folks that our minds change with information as Bayesian priors shift. Delighted to change my mind too if you can show me better ways.
What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile & trafficker.
Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a âBlue on Blueâ screw up?
Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?
Q: Do our sources and methods permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?
Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn & @npr conspicuously will not?
Q: Do you have the financial records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs supposed âhedge fundâ offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund?
Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? đ
Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & donât ever call @TwitterSafety âSafetyâ again.
Itâs so weird what the internet chooses to infer. Obviously Iâm worried about a tie back to some unit of Israeli intelligence. Itâs Robert Maxwellâs daughter for Godsake.
The internet fixates generally & internet Israel critics more than most. Internet inference is very weird.
Some of my motivation is to communicate that *if* some unit in Israel is ultimately directly implicated, it sure as hell isnât âThe Jewsâ or âIsraelâ that is behind this. That ordinary Jews would risk everything to stop such techniques. And Iâm willing to make the point concrete.
Do I know that it is Israel behind this? No. Do I think one nation acted alone? Iâm not even positive that Epstein was state sponsored. What do I believe? That Israel and the US WERE part of a GROUP of national ICs that turned a blind eye to child sex trafficking at a *minimum*.
How big is that group? Well, I believe *If* it exists it contains at least 2 nations not 1. And while I love Israel and have lived there, Iâm very worried about the universal silence over this.
Why am I doing this? In part to stand up for 2 countries I *love* & fear went wrong.
Israel has had some terrible operations (e.g. Lillehammer) like the US (e.g. Cointelpro). And their strength comes from being strong enough to face those horrors when the happen.
And I believe in my 2 favorite nations enough to ask the questions whose answers I fear to my soul.
I have said this before. But the fixation on Israel never rests. So neither will its honest critics and its defenders. I would like to think I can count my self among both their ranks. End.
And remember, if you mention anything funny going on you are just a crazy person complaining that your Twitter game is lame. And if James OâKeefe has video of an engineer laughing about it, everything PV does is faked. And Epstein totally killed himself and no one cares about it.
Also Antifa doesnât exist. And the election was merely fortified. And masks donât work unless they do. And protests are mostly peaceful unless they occur on January 6th. And radicalized Muslims are suffering from white supremacy. Unfettered conversation is bad.
Have a great day.
I think folks get confused that Jeffrey Epstein was valued for providing sex to his circle.
I donât think thatâs right. Many in his circle had access to sex.
You have to take a next step to see it.
The thing Epstein offered that his friends just couldnât get...was silence.
Think Iâm wrong? Then where are any competent probing articles on this story in national news media.
Every one of us who talks about this story knows fear. I do. All the time. Fear is the product. Sex silenced by terror.
Are you a reporter? Then why havenât you filed the story?
Ask for the hedge fund filings. Ask on the whereabouts of the contents of his Villard House office. Then try to get some rest.
Not so easy as it sounded right?
No, Epstein provided a blackout curtain of silence woven from implied terror. And you need state cooperation for that.
Usual Disclaimer: I am not feeling suicidal and have no further knowledge Beyond what I put out months ago. I am not a threat as I only met him once briefly and have no other intimate secrets requiring my silence. Iâm now just a broken record that everyone has heard before.
âIn todayâs regulatory environment Itâs virtually impossible to violate rules. And this is something the public really doesnât understand...Itâs impossible for a violation to go undetected; certainly not for an extended period of time.â -Former NASDQ Chairman, Bernie Madoff
This is what institutional betrayal looks like when you stare straight in its eyes: relaxed, confident, respectable, smooth, knowledgeable.
Itâs COVID pronouncements. Or String Theory. Or CPI revisions. Or âLabor Shortagesâ. Or fast-track trade treaties:
Many years ago 2002-6, I would give talks about Madoff & Epstein using âBlack Arts Capital LLCâ as a proxy, with the tag line âWeâd tell you what weâre doing, but then...â
I guessed BM might be front-running his own business. Boy was I wrong on the specifics.
RIP Bernie Madoff.
Yep. Dumb. Cringe. Racist. Arrogant. Galaxy Brain. Boring. Smell my own farts. Wordy. Libtard. Thiel Henchman. Boomer. Nazi. Zionist. Elitist. Grifter. Epstein associate. Thirsty. Woke. MAGA.
Ah. Life on line.
Thinking of installing a pull down menu.
Might I ask: Why say it?
Eric, if you are falling for the âlab leakâ canard then youâve just shed about 80 IQ points.
Looks like political forces are steering your thinking, not empirical reasoning.
Intellectual fail.
John reached out to me not all that long ago. I also will not kill myself. Iâm not suicidal.
Also, this is getting fucking ridiculous.
This authoritarian turn around Epstein, Wuhan, Ivermectin, âFortifying Democracyâ, UAP, climate, mostly peaceful protests, Leaked Tax ReturnsâŠ
Getting subtle messages from U.S. officials saying, in effect: "We're coming for you McAfee! We're going to kill yourself". I got a tattoo today just in case. If I suicide myself, I didn't. I was whackd. Check my right arm.
$WHACKD available only on http://McAfeedex.com:)
Â
âŠmandatory racism exorcism at work, #metoo witch hunts, shadowbanning, Build Back Better, Trust and Safety, TOS changes, compulsory speech, ANTIFA denials, Labor Shortage claims, denial etcâŠetc⊠is clearly a repudiation of all the US stands for. He was bugged by it all.
And if you mention the ENORMOUS number of issues that are behaving in this *same* totally artificial fashion, the reputation attacks SOAR from all sides.
What the hell has control of the US and why is it localized to the Democratic Party & itâs associated media and businesses?
I wish I could remember his call w/ more precision. But it was when I was in San Francisco. I couldnât believe I was known to him.
NOTE: I will be taking a new approach to all repetitive doxing, reputational or other attacks as a result.
Think Iâm done fucking around.
Having been menaced over asking for Epstein as a fake âDisgraced Financierâ to be called out by our press and connected to any intelligence services, this takes on new meaning.
When you canât call your own damn teams for help, who can you even call?
I so hate this shit. RIP JM.
I have two bits of information about JE that are not public.
1) An interchange from McAfee on Epstein.
2) Knowledge that Epstein was asking after me in a late email just before he died. I have no idea why. There is no more contact about Epstein than one meeting about 20yrs ago.
Â
Iâm quite concerned now given Johnâs 2020 call.
The person, @officialmcafee, who reached out to me *obsessed* about not being âsuicidedâ like Jeffrey Epstein, is characterologically the same as the person described hours before his death by his wife here.
Assume for the moment that his wife is correct in what she says hereâŠ
That would change the Bayesian priors considerably for me. The main doubt I had and that he might actually have killed himself is that my information was just over a year old. Prison could have changed someone. Very unlikely in McAfeeâs case. But not impossible.
Now I think not.
No one on earth probably has gone to greater lengths (e.g. tattooing themselves) in communicating âIf I am found dead like Jeffrey Epstein I was murdered.â
And he is found dead from gravity in a prison? That sounds like something else. That sounds like a message killing.
What is a âMessage killingâ? Well itâs not much talked about.
MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Antonio R Caponigro.
When Tony Cponigro was killed in 1980, he was found in the Bronx with $300 dollars shoved in his mouth and lower orifice.
MESSAGE: Donât be Greedy.
MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Marisol MacĂas Castañeda
A Mexican journalist, editor and blogger writing anonymously about drug cartels was murdered by Los Zetas. She was found with her computer keyboard and other peripherals.
MESSAGE: The Cartels can find those who blog anonymously.
MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Abe Reles.
Reles was a Hitman who was just about to turn on Albert Anastasia in 1941. Instead He mysteriously fell to his death while under tight police supervision.
MESSAGE: âThe bird (Reles) could sing (testify) but he couldnât fly (defenestrated).â
Applying the same logic here, POSSIBLE MESSAGE KILLING TARGET:John McAfee.
John died in *exactly* the way he told us he would *never* die: like Epstein.
MESSAGE: âWe can get anywhere. You canât stop it by taking elaborate precaution. We can always murder so it canât be proven.â
- Caponigro
I have never said âJeffrey Epstein didnât kill himselfâ. Because, shady as it was, I couldnât get to a high enough level of belief.
I donât believe the John McAfee I spoke to, focused on his being suicided, committed suicide of his own free will in the manner of Jeffrey Epstein.
Of course, if McAffee wasnât a suicide, it naturally increases my Bayesian prior that Epstein wasnât an uncoerced suicide either.
Oddly, I canât think of two more brash personalities, who would be more indifferent to the concept of public shame.
This is now just too disturbing.
It is hard to read this story of Epsteinâs inexplicable deal with prosecutors without specialized vocabulary not meant for the public. The magical words are likely to be âevent deconflictionâ and âblue on blue incidentâ.
Otherwise you would think that this is about Ken Starr.
Â
If any reporters want to ask about the history of deconfliction between the Federal and International IC and local law enforcement they can contact these entities listed by the DOJ.
This lists the three major deconfliction database systems: SAFETNet, RISsafe, and Case Explorer:
Â
I just called to ask CaseExplorer for South Florida about the history and federal participation in deconfliction circa 2000-2008. I was getting the history going back to 1990.
Then I mentioned a Jeffrey Epstein.
âSir, I am now going to terminate this call.â
Reporters? Anyone?
The Guardian called him a Billionaire. The New York Times called him a suicide. Others called him a disgraced Financier.
Wouldnât we have to rule out IC construct? Why will no media ask about the possibility of a state sponsored Pedophile IC operation?
Is there no press at all?
He was not a billionaire. He was not a currency trading hedge fund genius. He was not a simple suicide.
This isnât about Ken Starr.
I would not trust any newspaper that refuses to ask this question:
Was Epstein a state sponsored operation tripped over by local law enforcement?
I think everyone publicly asking questions about the Intelligence Community and itâs relationship to Jeffrey Epstein knows true fear.
We are waiting for the cavalry (journalists and hearings). But we also know there is no journalism. Thereâs no institution left to ask questions.
Do you have a working hypothesis why nobody is touching this?
We sit here on @Twitter w @jack & @vijaya determining whether anyone will see our questions. Armies of âdebunkers/fact checkersâ assail our credibility, cheered on by those who *refuse* to do their jobs as reporters, senators & representatives.
And we wait. Hoping for a miracle.
But it takes nothing to report an article trying to find the hedge fund records which I claim would show that Epstein was not a hedge fund currency trading genius. I doubt there was a true >1B hedge fund at all. And no one will ask what the tie to the IC is.
As they likely know.
Wait. Jeffrey Epstein was connected to the Intelligence Community?
Thank you @RollingStone!!! Can we finally get to the point where we are asking why THERE HAS BEEN TOTAL COOPERATION of the Press with what is likely a **TOTALY** UNETHICAL IC OPERATION?đ
Â
I want academic freedom on this platform @jack. It takes too long for the normies and the press to get to the truth. Your @TwitterSafety just isnât good enough. This account was taking HUGE risk to talk about Epstein and intelligence.
Donât ever think of throttling me again.
BTW, what matters here is that Rolling Stone is mainstream enough that they are unlikely to be fully ignored. As this account was when repeatedly bringing up Epstein as a construct of the ICâŠ
The point is who labels others crackpots. Or havenât we noticed?
Itâs the class who said Hilary would win easily. That weâd banished volatility before 2008. That the Wuhan Lab Leak was racism. That labor shortages exist in mkt economies. That carbs are good, while fat is bad.
@EricRWeinstein was the first talking about Epstein being an intelligence âagentâ (Mossad IIRC), that was a long time ago, his brother @BretWeinstein was the first to speak about the lab leak, a long time ago, both were labelled as crackpots, now both being shown to be accurate
Those who believe Jeffery Epstein was a âdisgraced financierâ rather than a construct of an Intelligence Community & who never ran a billion $ forex hedge fund. People who think String Theory is our leading theory of physics. Or who said NAFTA lifts all boats like a rising tide.
People who believe an octave has 12 notes, but canât say why 12. Those who think MSNBC just kept misreporting Andrew Yangâs candidacy by accident over and over again. At some point you just have to realize that those who canât think for themselves HAVE to call those who do names.
Itâs tough getting things wrong over & over again as per the above. And every time we go through the exercise the increasingly desperate normies who cling to groups/experts should become more obvious to you. If youâve followed this account, know that this behavior will NEVER die.
The sheep among us will always be angry because their gods will always fail them until we reform our institutions. Which may or may not happen. Time will tell.
But have some compassion: Hug a sheep or NPC today. Tell them there is still hope and itâs not to late to become human.
*too
The cognitive tools for understanding any rationale behind NIH funded Gain of Function Research in China are almost certainly being withheld.
Look at it from the point of a true believer in the system. âWe have to not lose the bioweapon arms race & should keep our rivals close.â
âBut the public will never understand a partnership with our main rival as being safer than being frozen out of all CCP decisions. On the other hand we canât be seen as engaging in a bioweapons arms race. So we had myriad ways to evade the optics of what we were actually doing.â
âThen COVID got out. Suddenly the whole world was talking about zoonotic bat respiratory Corona viruses: a subject the public had never heard of before. Our excuses & proxies for what is essentially military strategy for containment of CCP biowarfare ambitions were center stage.â
âOnly we canât talk about this. And our strategy that worked well enough when no one in the public knew âGain of Functionâ, âSpike Proteinâ or âZoonoticâ terms stopped working when everyone on the planet was forced to become amateur scientists. Then we lost âLab Leak is racismâ.â
âSo what do we do? Do we have an open town-hall to explain all things that are part of delicate multi decade Wash DC political insider theory like âConstructive engagementâ, âIranian Nuclear Containmentâ, âTwo State Solutionâ? Of course not. Thatâs why we have an expert class.â
So we sit around with the expert class withholding all the cognitive tools âwe the peopleâ need to figure out whether we have the CORRECT public spirited Elite. Which we do not.
Thus the âeliteâ get more and more resentful that we are meddling in âtheirâ strategic endeavors. Ha.
The idea that itâs time to come clean about Epstein, Iran, the West Bank, Strategic Engagement, Nuclear Bluffing, Climate & Wealth, internal spying, Assange and Snowden, simply never occurs to a class that believes it is acting in a way that can NEVER be open to public scrutiny.
Start from this insider premise that is never said out loud, âThe purpose of democracy is to give the public the most minimal choice over multi-decade cryptic strategies that must be managed by insider classes, so that they can only slightly course correct from expert consensus.â
The populist premise is simpler: âYou insiders seem to be incompetent at your jobs & more than competent at your extraction of wealth & obfuscation of all with which you have been entrusted. How can we force you âeliteâ to account for your non-elite malfeasance and incompetence?â
Thatâs how I see it. We have to stop talking about this in the exact terms we are handed by the very âeliteâ who donât want us talking about the real issues. We need to stop using the framings weâre handed.
For example, âGain of Functionâ is largely a euphemism for âweaponizedâ.
Do I believe in an actual Elite that cannot share everything with the public. Yeah. Think about it; It cannot be otherwise.
Do I believe in this *elite*? This is the Keystone Cops meets Mr Magoo.
So I am neither a populist nor a defender of the system as it is currently found.
We should join the populists in demanding answers based on pathological extractive, unethical and incompetent behavior.
But you cannot âburn it all the fuck downâ, put it all on the blockchain or vote for complete transparency either.
We need a well paid actual public spirited elite public servant class.
And no one I know is willing to say this. They either defend the system as is, or want some radical revolution.
We need new folks in their 20s-50s. Not Fauci. Not Biden. Not Trump. Not Pelosi. Not McConnell.
If youâve been in power for a long time and are now in your 70s & 80s? It is simply time to go. Thatâs not ageism.
Thatâs an IMPLICIT part of the system. Weâve never before remotely had a President & core group this out of touch, this old, and this technically over their heads.
Soapbox speech over.
As always, thanks for listening and letting me try out these ideas at scale. đ
Distrust ANYONE like Apple who supports scanning your *private* photos, but wonât call for hearings into Jeffrey Epsteinâs fictitious multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund or will ask why NO top dedicated newsdesk will investigate his ties to Intelligence Communities. https://x.com/alexstamos/sta/alexstamos/status/1424054542879006728
Â
Â
This is an easy tell: people who have **less** than **zero** interest in elite pedophiles connected to intelligence, want intelligence on everyone, dominated by ordinary non-pedophiles. If youâre dumb enough to believe this i canât help you.
This is about control, not children.
Â
When you see this campaign, remember this: the face that has the privacy is hidden. Thatâs Apple.
The face being recorded? Why, thatâs you. The sucker.
Â
Prove me wrong @alexstamos, @apple and Tim Cook: join me in calling for hearings into the Intelligence Community, its connection to Jeffrey Epstein and state protected pedophilia in our highest âeliteâ Echelons.
No? Thought so. This is sickening. Creepy Cowardice? Thatâs iPhone.
Â
If I have this wrong, @tim_cook I will happily apologize. Will you join me in calling for open investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and ANY ties he had to the Intelligence Community? Whether he was let off through âevent deconflictionâ in a âBlue on Blue incidentâ in S. Florida? đ
Many appear to be on the lookout for any and all issues that allow authoritarians to concentrate power. So far we have:
A) Child trafficking.
B) Climate catastrophe.
C) âX is actually a public health issue.â
D) Society is Structurally bigoted/Evil.
E) âItâs a PANDEMIC people!â
So the problem is that climate and pandemic may require coordinated action. But there is seemingly no one honest & competent enough to forgo the opportunity to spread authoritarian control to surveillance, censorship, and expectations of obedience inconsistent with free society.
Iâd support the need of public spirited government to narrowly tell us what to do in the most limited of legitimate circumstances requiring coordination beyond our usual.
I donât support what Iâm seeing which is institutional fetish for using pandemic, climate, etc for control.
We have to rid ourselves of a class of authoritarians who want to turn everything into a catastrophe requiring the surrender of our personal freedom & privacy.
By the same token, sometimes there is a war or pandemic. And you may need war-time leaders over peacetime careerists.đ
I have always admired Ed Asner. It takes grit to stand for innocent children and a foundation named âRosenberg.â
This will be an unpopular tweet because Julius Rosenberg was a traitor. But many loyal progressive families were also targeted by the US government for nothing.
Â
Into that quagmire of actual Soviet spies, traitors and other scum alongside loyal do-gooding anti-totalitarian progressive US activists waded people who were focused that children not pay the price of COINTELPRO & other terrifying dirty tricks campaigns.
My family was targeted.
My parents generation bore the brunt of the extra-judicial anti-communist zealotry. And I, to this day, despise the suffocation of Communism and Totalitarianism in much the same way I canât stand the evil cruelty of Anti-Communism.
So choosing to stand for kids is a big deal.
Thank you Ed Asner for lending your name and strength as a man to a hugely unpopular and righteous progressive cause particularly close to my heart.
I donât know why so few stand for targeted children. Whether against Epstein, COINTELPRO, or the Taliban. But most adults run.
RIP to Ed Asner. A man who stood for deserving and innocent children at considerable cost to himself and one who repeatedly stood his ground for a better world. đ
Â
Imagine:
A) âReformedâ Pakistan Backed Taliban as Secret US Regional Security Partner.
B) The Wuhan Laboratory as US Bioweapons Research Partner.
C) Jeffrey Epstein as Trusted Intelligence Partner.
D) EcoHealth alliance as Sensitive Information/Defense Conduit.
were correct.
You would have a pattern. The US government would be trying to get things done (e.g. keeping tabs on PRC Bioweapon research) without an ability to explain anything.
No one wants to explain: âThe US protects pedophiles, works with fundamentalist killers, and empowers its rivals.â
But if you look at it, we donât seem to be getting to the bottom of ANY of these various stories. Itâs as if each story is just too uninteresting or draining to pursue for our Pulitzer hungry journalists. No one wants to hold truly in-depth hearings. Well, why arenât we digging?
Is it that our top leaders know all these truths already? That they have a common issue: we attempted to shackle scientists, spies, generals, geopolitical strategists to a point that they found unbelievably unethical workarounds for EVERYTHING we tried to get them to stop doing?
Â
Are our media, political and research classes effectively telling us: âWe donât owe you a thing. You put restrictions on us so we couldnât move. These nutty workarounds were needed and theyâre all YOUR fault. Not ours. We were trying to do your work until you made it impossible.â
Â
Imagine the Colonel Jessup. Only, this time, heâs not merely evil but also real and NOT good at his job. He is reborn as an incompetent who cannot do his job.
And he lacks the integrity of a real leader to blurt out that he did in fact order the Code Red:
Â
Take a look at the @EcoHealthNYC and @NIAID leadership.
I think what I want at this point is the truth about what we are up to in Afghanistan, Sexual Kompromat, BioWeapons research, inflated money Supply, etc. And I think what they think is that weâre simply not entitled to it.
Only problem is that this is still a democracy, weâre a free people, they work for us, and weâre right on this and theyâre wrong.
I think we need to see that all these big stories may be fitting a pattern: it may simply be Col. Jessupes (and their kluges) all the way down. đ
Â
I hadnât been saying much about @EcoHealthNYC for a reason. I donât have many mentors, but a man I respect as my mentor was on the board: a heroic figure to me & to others. So I had hoped that the situation there was under adult supervision.
I appear to have had misplaced hopes.
In a different world, these issues would first be dealt w/ behind the scenes so as to avoid destruction to our infrastructure. I assume @EcoHealthNYC is a typical proxy for the government which uses outside contractors to evade restrictions on government. But this is way beyond.
If I were a reporter, I would ask the board members about @EcoHealthNYCâs BioWarfare responsibilities given its @doddtra relationship. I would ask the 77 Nobel laureates about who organized the letter supporting the funding of Dr Daszak.
Journalists: Break a sweat. What is this?
This is a big deal. Treat Dr Daszak & Dr Fauci as they deserve: central figures in some story involving grey area BioWarfare strategy and responsibilities that we ordinary humans donât understand because no one will explain it.
The strategy failed: duh. Time to declassify it. đ
Things I don't believe we can't conclusively resolve:
A) COVID's origin.
B) The Jeffrey Epstein story.
C) UAP.
D) JFK assassination.
E) Vegas Shooting.
F) Extent of 'Democracy Fortifying' in 2020.
G) Efficacy of Non-Vaccines.
H) Mysterious WEF 'Build Back Better' mantra.
I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.
J) Adulteration of BLS CPI measure of inflation.
K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.
L) Sudden spike in fake 'Objective Third Party Fact Checking'.
M) Sudden "Diversity Equity Inclusion" explosion.
Q) Joe Biden's state of cognitive decline.
R) Nature of MSNBC campagin against Andrew Yang.
S) Nature of Dean Scream, Anti-Ron Paul and other interference in democracy by Mainstream media News.
T) Impact of loss of mandatory retirement on young people seeking work.
U) Rex84.
V) Collusion between National Academy and National Science foundation division of Policy Research and Analysis to fake demographic crisis in mid 1980s.
W) Lack on anyone building the significant & desperately needed new non-profit institutions despite skyhigh wealth inequality.
X) Loss of Academic Freedom across the board in Academe.
Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.
Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to @doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.
Moral: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.
A last point: I don't know what happened in most all of these (the NSF & BLS stories being exceptions). I really don't. The quality of my guesses is not particularly high. The quality of my suspicions as to what IS resolvable has been *considerably* higher, at least historically.
Can we skip to the âend run around bioweapon research restrictionsâ part?
Can we jump to the âEpstein & the intelligence communityâ story?
Can we discuss our moronic âMeet our partially reformed Taliban security partners.â theory?
No? Ok. I thought not. https://t.co/Ei58KBi5be
Almost every pivotal institution is lying about almost everything of importance, almost all the time now. We have to just stop.
@InfinityJames The stories are popular with some journalists. They are popular with readers too.
Somehow the editors always kill them. Itâs very interesting. âLetâs hold off: Nobody remembers Jeffrey Epstein.â
âNobody cares why @EcoHealthNYC was running some DOD grants through Wuhan.â Etc.
@MediClit The tweet has been seen by slightly more people than live in Dallas Texas.
Out of that, people will self select. I havenât been following the many comments but experience tells me that negative and mean people almost always have much more energy, focus and time on their hands.
Â
@MediClit It also takes some getting used to to realize how many people are watching such tweets since only a fraction engage. But Iâm not following all the comments. Too much to do. Sorry.
@MediClit Men & women are in a partnership.
When men donât stand up for little girls because they fear the state, the media and, in particular, the intelligence community, the partnership goes out of whack. But Iâm old fashioned. Weâre the expendable gender. And this is likely IC related.
@MediClit Letâs try to model better male female dynamics. Moms are pretty ferocious and this is a team effort.
Iâm sorry but there is something about looking at Epstein with that little girl on his lap on his private jet that makes me think we should be out on the DC mall with pitchforks.
âIâve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,â Trump booms from a speakerphone. âHeâs a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it â Jeffrey enjoys his social life.â -@NYMag
What was that about? Jeffrey Epstein was not a âdisgraced financierâ, 14 year olds are not âBeautiful womenâŠon the younger side.â
Was Trump sending us a message, a warning or a confession? Whatever it was, itâs a big deal. Time to revisit this article:
I once again note people reading things in that I didnât write. I canât help you. The difference between making a confession and sending us a warning about Epstein covers a *lot* of possible territory.
Think before assuming.
So this just appears now!?! And what do we learn? That if "Sources and Methods" of the Intelligence Community might be compromised, prosecutors regularly decline to push for full prosecution EVEN IN THE CASE OF SEXUAL ABUSE of minors and INFANTS.
Bingo: Follow the Silence.
Â
Â
I have spent a decade, literally, collecting hundreds of IG reports from the CIA via #FOIA. I've filed 13 requests and sued the agency 3 times since 2012. When @a_cormier_ & I started to review these docs earlier this year we spotted a disturbing pattern
We have an undisclosed program; there's some kind of 'understanding' that we don't understand. I very well understand why we don't casually compromise "Sources & Methods". But trafficking kids is NOT casual business. Nor is USING them as part of 'Sources & Methods' for kompromat.
One question now creates 2 teams:
Team A) 'Sources & Methods' are above child trafficking in importance.
Team B) Child Trafficking is above any exemption for our 'Sources & Methods'.
I believe that if Epstein needed to use kids for S&M as Kompromat, we lost our plot entirely.
Seriously, I am not being naive here. If we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we don't have the right to a nation? If our intelligence community is so pathetic...look you get the idea. If the US isn't protecting kids from our own IC, we aren't the US.
I understand we may occassionally have to fell a monster overseas. I understand that sometimes there's a ticking time bomb and 'extraordinary methods' are needed. I understand that we must surveil people or engage in illegal acts while undercover.
But you-can't-use-kids. Period.
Is there some GIANT understanding involving our journalists & news desks that when the IC says 'Sources & Methods' we all just say 'Ok. Anything you say boys.' Like, for example with @arobach being shut down on Epstein:
Abuse of Kids > Sources & Methods
Notice how everything adds up if there's a giant understanding that Sources & Methods trump everything protecting innocent children? You just say 'Sources & Methods are at risk'. Explains Acosta, Robach, Veritas, etc. Boom: No more Epstein mysteries. It's all 'Sources & Methods'.
Q: Why report Epstein was a disgraced Financier when no one seems to have traded with him?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why so little interest in covering Ghislaine relative to Kyle Rittenhouse?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why did no one ask where GM last crossed a border?
A: S & M.
Moral: Our kids cant vote. We bring them into the world totally dependent on us. If we have a country that deserves an Intelligence Service, we have a right to know that kids are 100% OFF LIMITS as regards 'Sources & Methods' by the IC of us or our allies. Period. Kids >>> S & M.
P.S. And...I appear to be back to being throttled more agressively after several threads were throttled less agressively or not at all by twitter.
At least at first on this thread. We will see whether that continues. CC'ing @lexfridman @benshapiro @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg
I have been told that âSources and Methodsâ of the IC must be protected by any means necessary.
That is likely the most parsimonious explanation for why the Epstein case never resolves. Something seems to happen to everything and everyone who could clear it up.
Is this a conspiracy theory?
Well, think about it like this. When the Intelligence Community is doing itâs job properly itâs supposed to generate conspiracies for the public good. So saying the IC is a conspiracy factory isnât a conspiracy theory; itâs part of a job description.
Further, we definitely have an âEvent Deconflictionâ system to make sure that local law enforcement & district attorneys donât bust & prosecute undercover federal agents, screwing up our secret programs. Events are called âBlue on Blue.â
So that isnât a conspiracy theory either.
Additionally, the use of honey traps, honey pots, and kompromat are all well known as tools of the IC, as is disinformation.
None of that is conspiracy theory either.
The only thing you can object to as irresponsible conspiracy theory is the assertion that this may apply here.
I submit this to you that âThis likely is the best explanation of all the improbable things that keep happening which keep us from learning the truth in this case.â
This isnât remotely tin foil hat territory. This looks like state protection of the Sources and Methods of the IC.
Jeffrey Epstein and the global Intelligence Community (IC).
Which of the following best describes Jeffrey Epstein and his most likely relationship to the IC?
âââââ
Jeffrey Epstein was most likely:
Â
2022
Organized civil disobedience is the correct next response to the prolonged, indefinite and deliberate abuse of exotic emergency powers inconsistent with being a free people in our own country.
I donât want to go there, but it is time.
We are going to have to get CCP influence out of our country. We are going to have to get Fauci and Daszak to explain what we were doing in Wuhan. We are going to have to drive Pfizer out of news sponsorship. We are going to have to extend freedom of speech to digital speech.
We are going to need algorithmic transparency from Twitter through regulation. We are going to need to rein in the Feds ability to print its way into crushing the working class through seignorage and blowing out income inequality for holders of risk assets.
We are going to need to scale back our military obligations so we can actually be counted upon by our partners. We are going to need to prohibit the Whitehouse from attempting to label those who raise the presidentâs cognitive decline as âPurveyors of misinformation.â
We are going to need hearings on the intelligence community and itâs relationship to pedophiles like Jeff Epstein endangering our children. We are going to need the receipts and federal securities filings from his likely non-existent hedge fund. We need student debt forgiveness.
We are going to have to liberate our scientists with full academic freedom and wealth so they can level with us. We are going to have to push for what âBuild back betterâ and âGreat Resetâ actually mean to the Stepford leaders who repeat it as mantra.
Weâre going to have to release Twitter activists from the protections we established for journalists who obey the SPJ code of ethics in trying to report news as news rather than opinion⊠or worse. We are going to have to face this climate crisis without strongarming consensus.
We are going to need nearly FULL transparency on repeated hypersonic invasion of our military airspace by unknown actors with data given to physicists. We are going to need to know what quiet deal we had with the Taliban and ISI around the absurd Afghanistan pullout by US forces.
We are going to have to take back our research universities so that they can do research. We need to severely limit the number of administrators and adjunct/student workers and costly journals and debt financing for educations. We need student debt to be discharged in bankruptcy.
Weâre going to need to stop CPI-U from being manipulated as a closet way of raising our taxes & slashing our benefits while pretending to simply calculate inflation. We need to review our trade agreements in light of revelations that they were always known to be Social Darwinist.
End
Presidents, Senators, Representatives, Agency Heads, Operatives, etc. in a democracy, must and can be *forced* into accountability. This is what Ronald Reagan sounded like when forced out of prolonged silence over the Iran-Contra scandal:
This happened. It hasnât always been like this. This is still possible. We could do this with Epstein, Wuhan/COVID, Bagram, CPI/Inflation, Stock Trading in Congress, Tech Censorship of political speech at government request:
cc:@tedcruz , @BernieSanders
Jean-Luc Brunel
John McAfee
Jeffrey Epstein
All officially committed suicide by hanging in prison without video.
You should check if you have a module installed in your head that IMMEDIATELY triggers to declare that this is likely coincidence or at worst an emergent phenomenon.
I think this isnât right.
We have a world where institutions BLATANTLY lie in the vague direction of the truth to make the truthâŠuhâŠpunchier. More viral.
Some people, upon detecting the lies (e.g. âClimate modeling is settled scienceâ), decide thereâs no truth in it *at all*.
đŽOn the Republican Party: âBecause of Trumpâs fanaticism, the worshipful base of the Republican Party barely regards climate change as a serious problem. Thatâs a death warrant to the species.â
Many believe there is no chance COVID was Zoonotic because we are lying about the lab by saying it has to be Zoonotic. But we donât know.
Many people are convinced Ivermectin is a total COVID solution since weâre obviously lying about human medicine as Horse Dewormer. It isnât.
No one knows if Epstein killed himself. We just know our papers arenât aggressively reporting that story. So many assume Epsteinâs death is fake or an obvious hit. Because it could be either, but our lame institutions donât dare ask even the easy questions. So we lurch to oppose.
Many people donât believe that Russia/Ukraine is a threat or even real because they can see the obvious daily spin. But it is a huge threat and an atrocity. Weâre just lying and spinning parts of it.
They donât believe the Fed has ANY function because it does do some bad stuff.
Moral: if you want a better model of Trump Supporters try this one: they prefer idiosyncratic lying/spin/distortion by a gadfly as an antidote to coordinated credentialed institutional polished lying with amazing production values. Further, they donât think *anyone* offers truth.
But they will react to spin and hype as if there is ZERO substance behind it if that spin and hype are coordinated across multiple venues, institutions & talking heads.
They arenât principally embracing Trump or idiocy. They are rejecting obvious coordination of hype.
That.đ
One example, offered freely and without my asking:
That would be me. A lifetime studying science but have never spent one second looking into climate change. Too many experiences with the left's consensus herd. Don't care about Ukraine, either. Anything they're all in on I ignore.
These powerful people could likely get sex elsewhere.
Epstein was an intrinsically terrifying person. He sold silence. His âvibeâ was terrifying and not by accident.
Even simpler: if Epstein is a disgraced Hedge Fund manager, release the trading records/filings.
And to your question, no one is disinterested in this story. Youâre either interested or anti-interested, as in *nothing* can make you report as if your life depends on ignoring it.
Spoiler Alert: Epstein was not a Multi-Billionaire currency trading hedge fund manager. The records *cannot* be fabricated as they would be referenced to extensive tick data and order books.
This is both an obvious and elaborate cover story. And no one will report out of fear.
One wish for Fatherâs Day: That every Dad w a daughter ask one simple question: âWhy are our news organizations not asking whether Jeffrey Epstein was a state sponsored Intelligence agent of one or more nations whose trafficking of little kids was protected as âSources&Methodsâ?â
Thereâs something that is just too horrible to imagine: that no leading news organization will pursue the question of whether an Intelligence agency of any nation would be permitted to allow an affiliate to traffic little girls. I see 0 evidence that Epstein managed a hedge fund.
I personally donât believe there was a hedge fund. I donât believe Epstein was a âdisgraced Financierâ. I donât believe he was ever a multi-billionaire. I donât believe he made his own money. I donât believe he traded currencies successfully. So: Where does this story come from?
If youâre going to report that heâs a âdisgraced hedge fund managerâ, go produce your evidence! Where is the evidence of this hedge fund??? Where are its trading records? Who was its prime broker? Did it focus on Carry trades? Mean Reversion? Trend following?
Or is it all a lie.
We Dads might at least stand together against any nationâs Intelligence Community trafficking children. If we canât do that, I donât know why Dadâs matter. And Iâm convinced Dadâs matter.
Thanks. đ
So let me get this straight. A âBritish Socialiteâ and a âDisgraced Financierâ recruited underage girls for their own debauched amusement as a romantic couple?
Does it occur to the New York Times that they are âgroomingâ us all to accept what they refuse to investigate & report?
Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit, groom and abuse underage girls, is set to be sentenced on Tuesday. She could spend much of the rest of her life in prison.
Follow updates. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/06/28/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-news-epstein?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes
âThe disgraced financier hanged himself in a Manhattan jail cell one month after his July 2019 arrest as he awaited his own trial on sex trafficking charges.â
Can the New York Times prove either one of their claims:
A) What was the nature of his hedge fund?
B) He hung himself?
I had 2 conversations with J Epstein. In one of them, he told me he had a huge hedge fund which traded currencies at his personal discretion. From what he said, it seemed VERY unlikely that he traded currencies, much less at scale.
Q: Was Epstein lying about having a hedge fund?
I donât believe ANY of this story youâre âreportingâ @nytimes. I donât think you know he was a disgraced financier. I donât think you know he hung himself. I donât think you believe that these people were recruiting as a romantic couple for their own amusement.
Stop grooming us.
My *guess* is that there was no currency trading hedge fund housed here at Villard House in Manhattan. Can the New York Times please establish whether the entire Jeffrey Epstein history is a constructed backstory? Multi-Billion dollar currency hedge funds canât be totally hidden.
Â
The way I look at this is that you the @nytimes know what youâre reporting is an official story. You also know that we know it is simply the official cover story. But what you WANT us to know is that you will not do your job as a newspaper while you are doing your other job here.
I donât believe the WHOLE Epstein story.
Thatâs my guess. đ
We donât hear much discussion of why our intelligence communities seemed so completely unaware of Maxwell & Epstein & unable to STOP their activities harming kids.
Whatâs the most likely relationship of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to the intelligence communities (IC):
Â
I have never heard of this before. Can someone source this please? Thanks.
Seems like something we would already know if it were both true and in the open.
Bizarre that the State Department rented out a five-story upper East Side mansion to Jeffrey Epstein from 1992 to 1996. Does the State Department rent out property to private citizens often? Seems weird.
Â
Claim is that this is the Daily News for December 23, 1997. Thank you.
Apparently this is real and surfaced years ago. And no one ever mentioned this?!? But sure. Details, detailsâŠ
I stand by my claim of two decades now: Epstein was a construct. He wasnât real. This guy was constructed to play a role by something with real money and real power.
"The State Department Once Rented A Townhouse Seized From Iran To Jeffrey Epstein â Then Sued Him For Subletting It.. His subtenant was Ivan Fisher, a NYC criminal defense lawyer who had famously .." https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/jeffrey-epstein-state-department
Â
Letâs get @snopes, @APFactCheck, @ReutersFacts, @PolitiFact to put this to rest.
Factcheckers: LFG!! Letâs get the denials on-the-record. Letâs end the conspiracy theorizing. What are we waiting for? Itâs a slam dunk. Right?
Joe Rogan: Jeffrey Epstein may have been CIA or Mossad spy https://nypost.com/2022/08/01/joe-rogan-jeffrey-epstein-may-have-been-cia-or-mossad-spy/
Â
What are we thinking here? âPants-on-Fireâ. Iâm thinking PoF.
Â
Itâs been about 20 years that I have been saying Epstein was a construct of the intelligence community. I want to know if I have been wrong for two decades.
What I do know is that I have never seen a single story directly debunking this.
Which, if you think about it,...
We donât hear much discussion of why our intelligence communities seemed so completely unaware of Maxwell & Epstein & unable to STOP their activities harming kids.
Whatâs the most likely relationship of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to the intelligence communities (IC):
Â
Jeffrey Epstein said to me directly that he ran a massive currency trading hedge fund.
I donât believe this is true and it is a decidable proposition. It is unfakeable because market impact canât be faked retroactively. No one wants to break this story by asking for the records.
I just asked the CIA my final question, âwhat happened with this?â
Â
If I turn out to be right that Jeffrey Epstein was not a currency trading hedge fund manager, the next question will be who helped him set up an elaborate contrived backstory. No individual scammer could do this. Why do journalists repeat the myth of âJeffrey Epstein, financierâ?
I find the above article a direct contradiction to the statements that I received during my previous communications with the CIA. https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/is-the-cia-involved-in-child-sex-trafficking
Â
Let me say the brutal truth: Oddly, the problem is NOT our journalists!! The story is repeatedly spiked *above* the level of the journalists. That endangers people like @elizableu, @martyrmade, @joerogan etc who take the risks to keep this story alive.
2023
@laten_c @ScottAdamsSays Years. Like 30 years. Intensely since tripping over Epstein 20 years ago.
To our government, there is nothing less interesting than large numbers of unexpected UFOs encountered by Air Force and Navy Aviators. Apparently.
Unless a living Jeff Epstein emerged from a UFO over the Wuhan Institute and confessed to releasing COVID19: https://dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Unclassified-2022-Annual-Report-UAP.pdf
Any updates: on the debris from 2nd, 3rd and 4th objects shot down over AK, Yukon & Lake Huron?
Or origin of COVID and the @EcoHealthNYC interference?
Or the source of the Epstein trading fortune?
Paper mask mandate efficacy?
Money supply changes on CPI?
Vaccine assessment?
Updates on FBI, DHS, GEC, CISA Prebunking citizens sharing real information through manipulated tech platforms?
Election interference via federal suppression of journalism?
Projected impact of Vinyl Chloride cloud in expected deaths & morbidity?
Disclosure of UFO/UAP history?
Updates on how the congressional leadership is able to beat the markets?
To whom Ghislaine Maxwell & Jeffrey Epstein trafficked?
Whether GM & JE were in any way related to the IC?
Why we pulled out of Bagram the way we did?
Why we canât question Ukraine escalation?
Etc?
This is something Iâve never seen: total suppression of answers to normal questions needed to make informed decision in everyday life and at the ballot box.
If this much needs to be protected on a need-to-know basis, democracy is simply over. This isnât compatible w/ democracy.
#TheDISCisReal #SlipTheDISC
Imagine if it were leaked that COVID came from an NIH grant: âThis-has-no-business-being-in-the-public-domain.â
Or if Epstein were foreign intelligence operating with tacit approval of the US IC: âThis-is-not-intended-for-public-consumption.â
Capisce?
My point: you public servants have protected AND failed too much. You smear *every* one of us who merely trips over your mile-wide trail of incompetent statecraft from Bagram to Wuhan that passes through 71st St Manhattan & east of Dayton.
MORAL: Protect less or succeed more. đ
All of us who have been claiming that the Ukraine situation is *wildly* more complicated & dangerous than portrayed, have been subjected to relentless harassment by farms of accounts smearing us as if we were Pro-Putin stooges.
These leaks show you *why* we are being smeared.
The Pentagon leaks are also damaging to the media by revealing that theyâve been parroting bullsh*t Ukraine war talking points.
Â
To cut to the core point: the US is acting as if it and NATO are going to war which requires âpatriotic coverageâ of news & events that does not interfere with a US âwar narrativeâ.
Except many of us donât get why we have a âwar narrativeâ that makes reporting facts unpatriotic.
Once again, we have a story like Epstein or Wuhan where we canât discuss the facts or analyze the news âBecause National SecurityââŠwhich is not a reason.
This is becoming our undoing. âBecause NatSecâ is not an explanation. It doesnât even have a verb. Itâs not an explanation.
The central question remains:
Was Jeffrey Epstein a *construct* of the intelligence community, who as state sponsored predator cannot be investigated by news media cooperating with government for âreasons of national security.â
That should sound crazier than it does today:
Â
I have been asserting that Epstein was OBVIOUSLY not a major financier since well before his Florida arrest in 2006.
These leaders are meeting him years after his conviction and incarceration.
This thing appears just *impossibly* fake. Iâm sorry. It seems fake. Just fake.
CIA's William Burns, Goldman's Kathryn Ruemmler, Noam Chomsky, the president of Bard College, a Kissinger consultant and a Rothschild. They all met with Jeffrey Epstein in the years after his conviction, documents show. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-calendar-cia-director-goldman-sachs-noam-chomsky-c9f6a3ff?mod=e2tw
Â
Simple question: can we be said to have a free press if it refuses to investigate the legally mandated financial records and filings of a multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund at Villard House in Manhattan, directed by Jeffrey Epstein that I claim simply never existed?
The claim from his team of exclusively young female employees at his 71st residence was that he only used Ultra Orthodox men to trade for him and that he issued all trading instructions, which required only a few minutes a day due to his brilliance.
I pointed out, nearly a decade ago, that there were no financial employees at all. No portfolio managers, no analysts, nothing.
My claim is that we all tripped over a MASSIVE âtoo big to failâ intelligence operation whose major revelation is not about Epstein but about near TOTAL material control of our news by intimidation and harassment of reporters:
ABC News Defends Its Epstein Coverage After Leaked Video Of Anchor
Have confirmed my brother @BretWeinsteinâs account has been captured. Unclear if the transparent scam pictured here is the reason, or the cover for the hijacking.
Let me also note by way of coincidence that several days ago my own phone started randomly taking action on its own. In particular initiating calls. Beginning posts to social media. Bleeding chats into each other. Transcribing my conversations from voice to text. Responding to texts in ways I never initiated (e.g. âSorry but I am unavailable right now. Can I check back later?â) and fabricating text.
We also know from the Twitter files that we have a lot of tech savvy people in GEC/CISA/etc and the IC who are desperate to âPrebunk Malinformation.â and who lost access to their white glove concierge-service at Twitter with Elonâs purchase. That means âdiscredit truthtellersâ in spook-speak apparently.
We canât know. So I donât know what to tell you. I just donât know. And it is deeply unnerving not to know. Sorry to bore you. Be mindful that William of occam is well known to those who would Weaponize his razor. Thanks! đ
Â
Keep in mind that everybody smart and outspoken knows that we arenât in tinfoil hat territory any more. That ship sailed with âfringe epidemiologistsâ, âhorse pasteâ âLab leak is racistâ âswift and devastating takedownsâ âEpsteinâs non existent currency trading mega hedge fund.â Etc. We are under attack everyday. Obviously.
He is the âDiscovery & Disclosureâ candidate:
Assassination Disclosure.
Wuhan Disclosure.
Epstein Disclosure.
Ukraine Disclosure.
UAP Disclosure.
Pharma Disclosure.
If youâre totally unethical & need these disclosures *never* to happen, Iâd recommend smearing his campaign.
As for his wildest views, Iâm up for hearing his arguments. As I told him directly, a lot of them have sounded crazy to me. But a lot of things that sounded crazy to me have come true recently. So I want to hear him talking with experts who strongly disagree with him.
But I think the big story is that this is a man who will push to learn what is going on that we canât see and accepts very little of the modern institutional narrative. Really gracious, smart and earnest in person.
2024
For those more interested in the relationship of Epstein to the Intelligence Community than in lurid celebrity details, I recommend searching document 1320-9.pdf for claims about a secret non-prosecution agreement, or 'NPA'. Grateful for any other such pointers. Thx in advance.
Â
Itâs incredibly obvious. But it is so obvious that it has to be made dangerous to say it. Like âWhat are we doing in Ukraine *exactly*?â or âWhy are we inducing children towards surgical irreversible self-mutilation and self-sterilization? or âIf Epstein was a disgraced hedge fund manager in FX, who was Epsteinâs prime broker and where is the history his supposed trades?â
Itâs so fake, as to be self revelatory.
2025
I think many of you made a huge mistake about the âClient Listâ. About âLolita Expressâ. About âPedophile Island.â That is, if the goal was to use Epstein to get justice, and put an end to this abuse of children and civilians by the sickest members of the worldâs ICs.
You had fun with memes. And you let an IC sponsored pedophile get away. We were supposed to be pushing the press:
âWhy donât you ask **any** truly detailed questions about a supposed multi billion dollar FX hedge fund that may not have existed at all?â That wasâŠand isâŠthe first order of business.
We canât know exactly what he did, where and when.
But there is no way to fake this hedge fund. Either he had an enormous fund or he didnât. We can get all the details if he did. Or push as to why they donât exist.
I donât know if he killed himself. I donât even know if he is dead. I donât know if there is âthe Epstein client listâ.
The thing we know best is that he claimed to manage a multibillion dollar fund that ***cannot*** be hidden. Where are its records and employees?????????â Why does the press avoid reporting on this fund like the plague???? It was headquartered at Villard House for Christ sake. Madison Avenue. Who liquidated it? Who worked there? wtf?
This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the worldâs largest mega yachtsâŠthat somehow isnât registered or flagged. It leaves no wake. No shipyard built it or serviced it. It has no crew. No harbor master has ever seen it.
âItâs so quiet that Lockheed asked to study it. Itâs said to be made of optically neural superconducting ice crystals that form only from the tears of virgin sea lions cooled to absolute zero so it canât be seen. He brilliantly purchased a Bugis Prahu Charter that was grandfathered in before the 1609 Mare Liberum was in force so that he alone may sail the seas without ever communicating with other vessels or harbors. It is said that his carbon fiber anchor and chain stretched to the bottom of the Challenger Deep so that he didnât need to approach the shore for years on end.â
Câmon.
The key was that he wasnât a âdisgraced financierâ. He was a construct fitted with a mysterious poorly drawn backstory. And that construct probably belonged to several Allied nation states:
âHeâs so brilliant that he only accepts people who surrender total control of their wealth under power of attorney. He is closed to anyone who doesnât have 1 Billion dollars minimum. In fact: his investor list is so discreet, and is said to be so secretive and closely guarded that he has only one known client.â
Did you not realize that outside investors are a liability to a cover story or front? Beware any super secretive fund that has a story why they dont want family office or institutional money. This is not the only one btw.
HenceâŠthe exclusivity.
Why was he obsessed by Gravity? He was almost certainly a front used for funding edgy science, information gathering, control, etc away from normal channels.
It wasnât one thing. He wasnât a creepy front companyâŠhe was a mall filled with different business providing different goods and services. It wasnât all about raping kids. Some collection of people invested something like 9 figures in creating a weird 11-12 figure fairy tale via leverage. And it was used for a lot of things. It was called Jeffrey Epstein.
Moral: focus on the cover story. Not the memes. Go after the press first. Figure out exactly who is stopping the fund from being dissected. Focus on the non reporting.
This is what Anti-Interesting is all about. Use it.
One manâs opinion. đ
Never let go of âThe Epstein Thing.â
We all need to stand up against rogue psychopaths within our ICs, and find the courage to speak up on behalf of those without the ability to speak for themselves.
How is this complicated?
As the oath says: All enemies, foreign & domestic.
I am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was. Or whether he killed himself. Or what the "Client list" was. Because, like you, I don't actually know about any of those things. And I have never claimed that I do.
I am going to tell you with 100% absolute certainty that Epstein is "Anti-Interesting" to our news desks. No one want to publish a story about how his multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund worked by interviewing a few of those many former eployees that it must have had.
Or by reviewing the fillings it must have made to the Government. Or its trading records. Or by talking to the sell-side coverage it must have had. Or by going through it's records.
Or that it didn't exist. And he wasn't a Multi-Billion financier. And that someone set him up as a construct at great expense.
The scandal is not investigating. Not publishing, Not doing journalism. Clearly the state has control of our news.
I don't care where this leads. I believe he was most likely constructed by a *tiny* number of tight lipped psychopaths who set him up to ruin the lives of children in the service of gathering information. And those people...whoever they are...would need to be brought to justice. Whatever the cost.
I would like to think there isn't a father alive (no matter how flawed) who disagrees with that. And that we need to put ourselves at risk as a group to protect our children from the State, The Press and The Evil co-conspirators. And I don't know who they are. It's terrifying.
I also thing that a number of people who had nothing to do with that but who had deaings with Epstein (e.g. scientists) need to be separated from that aspect of evil and fully exonerated. And those that participated in the Evil with Epstein need to face justice as well.
Pretending that there is nothing further to see here, and that no one wants this investigated remains preposterous.
This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads?
Controversial Professor Jordan Peterson
Disgraced Financier Jeffrey Epstein
Panamanian Strongman Manuel Noriega
Anti-Vaccine Activist Robert F Kennedy Jr.
Dragon Believer Joe Rogan
Far Right Crackpot Laura Loomer
Fringe Epidemiology Professor Jay Bhattacharya
It's their formula.
Dear @Newsweek, I have a name beyond "former Joe Rogan guest."
https://www.newsweek.com/sam-harris-joe-rogan-politics-podcast-social-media-2056158
What is the hold up on JFK, UFO, Epstein and EcoHealth/Fauci/Collins/Daszak? Exactly?
I just don't understand. It's at risk of slipping away. Yet again.
Does anyone get this?? Wasn't this supposed to be the easy part that got done *first*? That is what I was told.
I'm lost here.
Glad to see this promised. I am hoping not to be disappointed only to have the can kicked further down the road.
I have to admit that I have never known specifically what the much discussed "Epstein Client List" is. Is it his total investor pool? His pedophile network? His tax advice business customers? Funded Scientists? Everyone who has spent time on the island? All of them? Does that phrase have a specific or a general meaning?
The quoted phrase just seemed to take on a life of its own on social media. If it means something specific, is that is what is claimed to be the subject of the release tomorrow? Part of it?
Sorry to be obtuse. It's a phrase I don't think think I ever heard defined, so I never used it much as it seems like he was doing multiple different things with very different groups of people.
What does it mean specifically to the best of your understanding?
Thx in advance. đ
Related Pages
- Academic Freedom
- Anti-Interesting
- Blue on Blue
- Church and Pike Commissions
- Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue
- Deconfliction
- Digital Wetwork
- Early is another name for wrong
- Follow the Silence
- Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)
- Map the Silences
- Managed Reality TM
- Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing
- Seberging
- Strategic Silence
- The Portal Ep 25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein
- Distributed Idea Suppression Complex
- Honeypot (espionage)
- Sources and Methods
- Scientific patronage by Epstein
References
- â 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Eric Weinstein on X, Jul 12, 2025
- â 2.0 2.1 Eric Weinstein on X, Jul 9, 2025
- â 3.0 3.1 Eric Weinstein on X, Jun 19, 2022
- â Eric Weinstein on X, Dec 1, 2021
- â Eric Weinstein on X, Jan 17, 2021
- â Eric Weinstein on X, Jul 11, 2025
- â Eric Weinstein on X, Sep 11, 2019
- â Eric Weinstein on X, Nov 5, 2019