Law of Gaslighting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
== Related Terms == | == Related Terms == | ||
* [[Cult of the Art of the Possible]] | |||
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | * [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | ||
* [[Digital Wet-work]] | * [[Digital Wet-work]] | ||
Revision as of 07:06, 4 March 2026
LAW of GASLIGHTING: Any set of outspoken minds X on topic Y not aligning with modern institutions moves through 4 stages.
I) Speaking out about Y.
II) Speaking out about Institutional Gaslighting on Y.
III) Finding X(Y) Gaslighting is Y independent.
IV) Gaslighting *replaces* Y.
Example:
I) âHow can it be that the ONLY thing we know about COVID is that it couldnât be from the Wuhan lab.â
II) âHow is asking about Lab origins of COVID racist? Thatâs both stupid & insane.â
III) âSupporting the Police is also Racist?â âMath is racist?â
IV) Itâs all fake.
In simplest terms:
To the outspoken, everything eventually migrates toward focus on institutional gaslighting/smear campaigns.
Donât believe it? Pick your 3 favorite public minds challenging institutional narratives.
Now look for the signs of this trauma.
So: Howâd I do?
đ
