Jump to content

The Precariat: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 488: Line 488:
|username=pcater64
|username=pcater64
|content=2nd homes on the vineyard 🥴
|content=2nd homes on the vineyard 🥴
|timestamp=4:11 PM · Oct 12, 2025
}}
|timestamp=4:55 PM · Oct 12, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/ericrweinstein/status/1978320840111567135
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So look at this poll.
I am here to tell you we the United States, are drowning in top scientific talent and we are making their lives into a '''precarious''' hell conning them into make everyone else rich. Except them.
“Make value for us to capture.”
Around 1970, Scientific research was transformed into a TERIBLE and '''PRECARIOUS''' U.S. career.
Made much worse in 1990.
Why is no one ringing this alarm? I have no clue.
Look at the poll results.
I repeat:
Scientific research was transformed into a TERIBLE and '''PRECARIOUS''' U.S. career.
Why is no one else ringing this alarm?
I’m simply right on this. It does not matter what the consensus is. This is not a hill to die on. I will win every time.
I am telling you the truth. You are signed up for more pandemics, more drone incursion, more inflation, more Pharma recalls, and to lose to China.
Deal your scientists back in and away from the precariat. This is insane.
Look at this poll. There really is no question about this. It’s a catastrophe.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1977614904174809588
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=U.S. National Interest Poll.
Which competitive occupation can America *least* afford to surrender as a highly attractive career path for Americans:
|media1=ERW-X-post-1977614904174809588.jpg
|timestamp=4:11 PM · Oct 12, 2025
|timestamp=4:11 PM · Oct 12, 2025
}}
}}