Jump to content

Free Speech: Difference between revisions

2,369 bytes added ,  17 September
Line 313: Line 313:
}}
}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1077751822243192834}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751828429778944
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=7/ I hope this is wrong. But if itā€˜s correct, ā€œimproperā€ bitcoin transactions will start to carry serious criminal penalties. Further @jordanbpeterson will not deliver a technological fix as indicated.
Watch @datasociety, @nytimes coverage & payment channels.
Happy Holidays.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751816400433152
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=1/ The Christmas Thread.
First off, Merry Xmas to all.
I’m asking for your help. I want to know whether any of you know about any quiet working groups or meetings involving but not limited to Visa/MC/PayPal/etc working on the issues of ā€œpopulismā€/ā€œradicalizationā€ as euphemisms.
|timestamp=Dec 25, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751820913565697
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=2/ This would be organized by by some group like CFR, NAS or some other blue chip institution. It would be looking to figure out how to handle the ā€œproblemsā€ of popular nullification of institutional objectives. In short it would view Brexit, Trump and restrictionism as ā€œhateā€.
|timestamp=Dec 25, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751822243192834
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751822243192834
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=2/ This would be organized by by some group like CFR, NAS or some other blue chip institution. It would be looking to figure out how to handle the ā€œproblemsā€ of popular nullification of institutional objectives. In short it would view Brexit, Trump and restrictionism as ā€œhateā€.
|content=3/ This quiet meeting would bring together the major ā€œstakeholdersā€(?) which would not include the public. The twin problems the meeting would actually be trying to solve are ā€œfree speechā€ and ā€œdemocratic choiceā€ which the public generally doesn’t want solved at all.
Ā 
|timestamp=Dec 25, 2018
3/ This quiet meeting would bring together the major ā€œstakeholdersā€(?) which would not include the public. The twin problems the meeting would actually be trying to solve are ā€œfree speechā€ and ā€œdemocratic choiceā€ which the public generally doesn’t want solved at all.
}}
|timestamp=2:23 AM Ā· Dec 26, 2018
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751823576981504
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=4/ The meeting would explore the question of how to use the existing anti-terror programs & platform level controls to handle garden variety dissent contributing to popular nullification as if it were ā€œhate speechā€, which it would claim was akin to, or a gateway for, terror.
|timestamp=Dec 25, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751825569181696
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=5/ I’m not asking b/c I have any information that such a meeting occurred. I, in fact, have NO such information. However, I am well aware of how coordinated action has been made to look more ā€œemergentā€, in the past & I now think we’re at a very dangerous juncture between 2018-20.
|timestamp=Dec 25, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751827049771008
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=6/ This all now looks way off to me. Patreon is just the window through which we are glimpsing it. Why? Because theyā€˜re clumsy. I fear weā€˜re seeing some plan to reestablish the former power of the Gated Institutional Narrative well above Patreon’s paygrade using payment networks.
|timestamp=Dec 25, 2018
}}
|timestamp=6:23 PM Ā· Dec 25, 2018
}}
}}