Jump to content

Peer Review: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Criticisms of the peer-review crisis include the ad hominem nature of the review, the appeal to authority, the selection bias, the confirmation bias and the replication crisis.
Criticisms of the peer-review crisis include the ad hominem nature of the review, the appeal to authority, the selection bias, the confirmation bias and the replication crisis.
== Quotes ==
<blockquote>
"The pressure for conformity is enormous. I have experienced it in editors’ rejection of submitted papers, based on venomous criticism of anonymous referees. The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science."Β  β€” Julian Schwinger
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
"Also, funding by peer review results in group-think and whole scientific fields floating off in a self-perpetuating irreality bubble for decades. Randomness will fund mavericks, mostly crackpots, but some may blow up established dysfunctional disciplines."Β  β€” [https://twitter.com/i/status/1128389263526060032 David Chapman]
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
"A technical argument by a trusted author, which is hard to check and looks similar to arguments known to be correct, is hardly ever checked in detail."Β  β€” [https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2014/voevodsky-origins Vladimir Voevodsky]
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
"Research by salaried laborers is becoming a rent-seeking citation ring consisting of large scale imitative rituals, with a decreasing number of results, an increasing cluelessness of participants, and a multiplication of useless rules."Β  β€” [https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1009417068926722048 Nassim Nicholas Taleb]
</blockquote>


== On Youtube ==
== On Youtube ==
Line 9: Line 27:
== On X ==
== On X ==


{{#widget:Tweet|id=5759528816}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=5765238763}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=55469441726693377}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=363741507557142529}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=767774213553860608}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=800777477614280704}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=979383976325390336}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1230888559411789824}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1230888559411789824}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1417982625478705152}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1417982625478705152}}
Line 29: Line 54:
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1687355731291385856}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1687355731291385856}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1770443592999563643}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1770443592999563643}}
== Quotes ==
<blockquote>
"The pressure for conformity is enormous. I have experienced it in editors’ rejection of submitted papers, based on venomous criticism of anonymous referees. The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science."Β  β€” Julian Schwinger
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
"Also, funding by peer review results in group-think and whole scientific fields floating off in a self-perpetuating irreality bubble for decades. Randomness will fund mavericks, mostly crackpots, but some may blow up established dysfunctional disciplines."Β  β€” [https://twitter.com/i/status/1128389263526060032 David Chapman]
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
"A technical argument by a trusted author, which is hard
to check and looks similar to arguments known to be
correct, is hardly ever checked in detail."Β  β€” [https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2014/voevodsky-origins Vladimir Voevodsky]
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
"Research by salaried laborers is becoming a rent-seeking citation ring consisting of large scale imitative rituals, with a decreasing number of results, an increasing cluelessness of participants, and a multiplication of useless rules."Β  β€” [https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1009417068926722048 Nassim Nicholas Taleb]
</blockquote>


== Relevant Essays and Papers ==
== Relevant Essays and Papers ==