National Science Foundation (NSF): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Confused by the fact that science sees religion as its chief threat. Might we worry instead about threats posed by [[National Science Foundation|NSF]]/NIH/NAS?
|content=Confused by the fact that science sees religion as its chief threat. Might we worry instead about threats posed by [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]]/NIH/NAS?
|timestamp=1:14 PM · Jul 27, 2009
|timestamp=1:14 PM · Jul 27, 2009
}}
}}
Line 22: Line 22:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Give me a sign [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]]: what are we going to do about the epidemic level of hogwash that threatens our nation in finance/markets?
|content=Give me a sign [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]]: what are we going to do about the epidemic level of hogwash that threatens our nation in finance/markets?
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 30: Line 30:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I find @EricRWeinstein addressed by [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] speaking in the first person singular. Think Eric: what did Moses do in this situation?
|content=I find @EricRWeinstein addressed by [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] speaking in the first person singular. Think Eric: what did Moses do in this situation?
|timestamp=10:08 PM · Sep 3, 2009
|timestamp=10:08 PM · Sep 3, 2009
}}
}}
Line 39: Line 39:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Oh [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] do not confuse me more. Did thou not fund me to go to MIT? Did thou not command me to gain the PhD for our nation's good?
|content=Oh [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] do not confuse me more. Did thou not fund me to go to MIT? Did thou not command me to gain the PhD for our nation's good?
|timestamp=10:59 PM · Sep 3, 2009
|timestamp=10:59 PM · Sep 3, 2009
}}
}}
Line 62: Line 62:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=For @dabacon: "[[National Science Foundation|NSF]]/NAS study ways of glutting markets to depress wages for universities and other employers ignoring the scientific impact."
|content=For @dabacon: "[[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]]/NAS study ways of glutting markets to depress wages for universities and other employers ignoring the scientific impact."
|timestamp=2:20 AM · Nov 24, 2009
|timestamp=2:20 AM · Nov 24, 2009
}}
}}
Line 323: Line 323:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The talk presented evidence to the [[National Academy of Sciences (NAS)|National Academy of Sciences]] that NAS & [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] partnered to manipulate markets over scientist salaries.
|content=The talk presented evidence to the [[National Academy of Sciences (NAS)|National Academy of Sciences]] that NAS & [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] partnered to manipulate markets over scientist salaries.
|timestamp=2:38 PM · Dec 20, 2009
|timestamp=2:38 PM · Dec 20, 2009
}}
}}
Line 332: Line 332:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now ask yourself why would [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] be trying to weaken American scientists? Why would NAS help? How would NSF dependent scientists self-defend?
|content=Now ask yourself why would [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] be trying to weaken American scientists? Why would NAS help? How would NSF dependent scientists self-defend?
|timestamp=8:11 PM · Dec 20, 2009
|timestamp=8:11 PM · Dec 20, 2009
}}
}}
Line 354: Line 354:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=An excellent test of our President is whether the Obama era [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] can undo catastrophic damage to US scientists begun by the Reagan era '''NSF'''.
|content=An excellent test of our President is whether the Obama era [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] can undo catastrophic damage to US scientists begun by the Reagan era '''NSF'''.
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 362: Line 362:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=An email from Twitter overnight said: "'''National Science Fdn (@NSF)''' is now following your tweets on Twitter." Yet, now [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] is gone. But why?
|content=An email from Twitter overnight said: "'''National Science Fdn (@NSF)''' is now following your tweets on Twitter." Yet, now [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] is gone. But why?
|timestamp=12:26 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=12:26 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}
Line 371: Line 371:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As we can obviously see each other [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]], I propose public dialogue on whether NSF should be strengthening scientists (ergo raising wages).
|content=As we can obviously see each other [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]], I propose public dialogue on whether NSF should be strengthening scientists (ergo raising wages).
|timestamp=1:13 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=1:13 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}
Line 380: Line 380:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you would like to see a dialogue with [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] on [[Academic Freedom|academic freedom]], compensation, shortage canards, etc... retweet and star.
|content=If you would like to see a dialogue with [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] on [[Academic Freedom|academic freedom]], compensation, shortage canards, etc... retweet and star.
|timestamp=1:15 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=1:15 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}
Line 393: Line 393:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I tweet as an Individual scientist. There are no work (Gov't/Corp) entanglements in this stream for [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] to worry about.
|content=I tweet as an Individual scientist. There are no work (Gov't/Corp) entanglements in this stream for [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] to worry about.
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 401: Line 401:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[National Science Foundation|@NSF]]'s human operator clarifies [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]]'s follow/unfollow:
|content=[[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]]'s human operator clarifies [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]]'s follow/unfollow:
RT @pffli    @EricRWeinstein Because human operators make mistakes.
RT @pffli    @EricRWeinstein Because human operators make mistakes.
|timestamp=3:20 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=3:20 PM · Dec 22, 2009
Line 411: Line 411:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] / @pffli, why not engage with reasoned critique? You have a fine economist on staff named M. Boylan. Ask about: http://bit.ly/NSFSG
|content=But [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] / @pffli, why not engage with reasoned critique? You have a fine economist on staff named M. Boylan. Ask about: http://bit.ly/NSFSG
|timestamp=3:24 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=3:24 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}
Line 429: Line 429:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In order for us to help keep [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] funded, healthy, & attractive, we need you to engage. And, of course, we've followed each other for years.
|content=In order for us to help keep [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] funded, healthy, & attractive, we need you to engage. And, of course, we've followed each other for years.
|timestamp=3:33 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=3:33 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}
Line 438: Line 438:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Thanks @pffli/Paul. You shouldn't have trouble getting [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] clearance to follow me. Ask around [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]]/NAS/Harvard/NBER/ASCB. I'll check out.
|content=Thanks @pffli/Paul. You shouldn't have trouble getting [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] clearance to follow me. Ask around [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]]/NAS/Harvard/NBER/ASCB. I'll check out.
|timestamp=7:14 PM · Dec 22, 2009
|timestamp=7:14 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}
Line 1,107: Line 1,107:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’ve experience it every time I bring up the secret [[National Science Foundation|NSF]] study that lead to the [[H-1B Visa|H1B visa]]. There is an absolute black out. But because I have the study, media can’t say it doesn’t exist. So they just refuse to reflect it. Same w/ other such issues. There’s just *no* MSM reflection.
|content=I’ve experience it every time I bring up the secret [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]] study that lead to the [[H-1B Visa|H1B visa]]. There is an absolute black out. But because I have the study, media can’t say it doesn’t exist. So they just refuse to reflect it. Same w/ other such issues. There’s just *no* MSM reflection.
|timestamp=8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020
|timestamp=8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020
}}
}}
Line 1,519: Line 1,519:
|content=So @PressSec we’re going to come straight after *your* #EliteDisinformation.
|content=So @PressSec we’re going to come straight after *your* #EliteDisinformation.


I surmise that [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]], @BLS_gov, @HHSGov, @NIH, @NIAIDNews, @doddtra, Fauci, Collins, etc, are all located under the Whitehouse in the Executive branch. Thus, [[Prebunked Malinformation|dis- or mis-information]] from them, is yours.
I surmise that [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]], @BLS_gov, @HHSGov, @NIH, @NIAIDNews, @doddtra, Fauci, Collins, etc, are all located under the Whitehouse in the Executive branch. Thus, [[Prebunked Malinformation|dis- or mis-information]] from them, is yours.
|timestamp=5:08 PM · Feb 3, 2022
|timestamp=5:08 PM · Feb 3, 2022
}}
}}
Line 1,541: Line 1,541:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@karyns4 [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] Wow! “All well paid and thriving.”  
|content=@karyns4 [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] Wow! “All well paid and thriving.”  


We are back?! With tenure? Easy grant renewals for long term research? 4 years to PhD? Full benefits? Kids in independent schools? Jobs in the same city as their spouses? 2nd Homes?
We are back?! With tenure? Easy grant renewals for long term research? 4 years to PhD? Full benefits? Kids in independent schools? Jobs in the same city as their spouses? 2nd Homes?
Line 1,555: Line 1,555:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’ll be sure to ask him. But in the meantime why don’t we ask why economists at [[National Science Foundation|@nsf]] in 1986 secretly did economic wage projections and then erased ALL the demand curves to pass the 1990 immigration act in a fake demographic panic to destroy our scientists’ bargaining positions?
|content=I’ll be sure to ask him. But in the meantime why don’t we ask why economists at [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@nsf]] in 1986 secretly did economic wage projections and then erased ALL the demand curves to pass the 1990 immigration act in a fake demographic panic to destroy our scientists’ bargaining positions?
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=steve_tadelis-profile-J1uogR7i.jpg
|image=steve_tadelis-profile-J1uogR7i.jpg
Line 1,573: Line 1,573:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’m not sure why Peter needs to clean up a conspiracy at [[National Science Foundation|@nsf]] and the National Academy of Sciences to defraud the US on behalf of technical employers who wanted their markets flooded with cheap talent. Can you ask economists what a “[[Labor Shortages|labor shortage]]” would be in a *market* economy?
|content=I’m not sure why Peter needs to clean up a conspiracy at [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@nsf]] and the National Academy of Sciences to defraud the US on behalf of technical employers who wanted their markets flooded with cheap talent. Can you ask economists what a “[[Labor Shortages|labor shortage]]” would be in a *market* economy?
|timestamp=7:39 AM · Feb 8, 2022
|timestamp=7:39 AM · Feb 8, 2022
}}
}}
Line 1,777: Line 1,777:
|content="A growing influx of foreign PhD's into U.S. labor markets will hold down the level of PhD salaries to the extent that foreign students are attracted to U.S. doctoral programs as a way of immigrating to the U.S."
|content="A growing influx of foreign PhD's into U.S. labor markets will hold down the level of PhD salaries to the extent that foreign students are attracted to U.S. doctoral programs as a way of immigrating to the U.S."


-Photograph from the secret [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] study that led to the H-1B.
-Photograph from the secret [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@nsf]] study that led to the H-1B.
|timestamp=8:24 AM · Dec 29, 2024
|timestamp=8:24 AM · Dec 29, 2024
|media1=ERW-X-post-1873283988804223195-Gf888ebasAAGE0-.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1873283988804223195-Gf888ebasAAGE0-.jpg
Line 1,790: Line 1,790:
|content=I highly recommend learning about the history of where H-1B came from before getting emotionally invested in it.
|content=I highly recommend learning about the history of where H-1B came from before getting emotionally invested in it.


It was born as a labor tampering conspiracy against American scientists headquartered at the @theNASEM (GUIRR) & [[National Science Foundation|@nsf]] (PRA) under Erich Bloch.
It was born as a labor tampering conspiracy against American scientists headquartered at the @theNASEM (GUIRR) & [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@nsf]] (PRA) under Erich Bloch.


https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/how-why-government-universities-industry-create-domestic-labor-shortages-of-scientists-high-tech-workers
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/how-why-government-universities-industry-create-domestic-labor-shortages-of-scientists-high-tech-workers
Line 1,818: Line 1,818:
|content="A growing influx of foreign PhD's into U.S. labor markets will hold down the level of PhD salaries to the extent that foreign students are attracted to U.S. doctoral programs as a way of immigrating to the U.S."
|content="A growing influx of foreign PhD's into U.S. labor markets will hold down the level of PhD salaries to the extent that foreign students are attracted to U.S. doctoral programs as a way of immigrating to the U.S."


-Photograph from the secret [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] study that led to the H-1B.
-Photograph from the secret [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@nsf]] study that led to the H-1B.
|timestamp=8:24 AM · Dec 29, 2024
|timestamp=8:24 AM · Dec 29, 2024
|media1=ERW-X-post-1873283988804223195-Gf888ebasAAGE0-.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1873283988804223195-Gf888ebasAAGE0-.jpg
Line 1,848: Line 1,848:
I invited you to a public debate about your claims as I’ve been fighting this insinuation of inferior American values in STEM for 35 years or more.
I invited you to a public debate about your claims as I’ve been fighting this insinuation of inferior American values in STEM for 35 years or more.


It’s a myth that came out of the [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] & @theNASEM.
It’s a myth that came out of the [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|@NSF]] & @theNASEM.


Let’s debate this in public. On camera.
Let’s debate this in public. On camera.
Line 1,953: Line 1,953:
“Peer Review” was a last ditch promise made to government funders: “Will you stay out of our research if we agree to give away much of our discretion?”
“Peer Review” was a last ditch promise made to government funders: “Will you stay out of our research if we agree to give away much of our discretion?”


You want to look up: Medicare act, MACOS, Baumann amendment, Utah medical clinics, and the [[National Science Foundation|NSF]] [[Peer Review|peer review]] wars of 1975.
You want to look up: Medicare act, MACOS, Baumann amendment, Utah medical clinics, and the [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]] [[Peer Review|peer review]] wars of 1975.
|timestamp=7:04 PM · Jun 9, 2025
|timestamp=7:04 PM · Jun 9, 2025
}}
}}