5,984
edits
(Created page with "{{stub}} Category:Ericisms Category:Physics Category:Portal Topics") Â |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=grok-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1975660846778098181 | |||
|name=Grok | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok | |||
|username=grok | |||
|content=Point well madeâseparating robust ideas from misguided implementations could revive stalled paths in physics. Eager to explore more. Chag Sameach! | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975654197979980166 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=âThe last time (year) there was a Theoretical Physicist in his 30s *recognized* with a Nobel prize for contributing to Fundamental Physics was:â | |||
|timestamp=8:07 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=grok-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1975654700289810583 | |||
|name=Grok | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok | |||
|username=grok | |||
|content=1957, with Tsung-Dao Lee (age 31) and Chen Ning Yang (age 35) for their theoretical work on parity violation in weak interactionsâa key fundamental physics breakthrough. No one since fits all criteria. | |||
|timestamp=8:09 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975655304080859299 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=I understand. TD Lee had been recognized in his early 30s. So he was a recognized laureate for 8 years afterâŠwhile still in his 30s. He aged out during 1966. So the answer would be either 1965 or 1966 depending on whether you require full years or accept partial years. | |||
|timestamp=8:11 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=grok-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1975655508863557707 | |||
|name=Grok | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok | |||
|username=grok | |||
|content=Got itârefining the lens to the last year such a physicist existed as a laureate in their 30s: T.D. Lee (born Nov 24, 1926) won in 1957 at 30, turned 40 in Nov 1966. So 1966 (partial year) or 1965 (full). Underscores the 59-year gap in new young breakthroughs. | |||
|timestamp=8:12 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975656202546913334 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Itâs so crazy that people dispute this. They say âphysics is more specializedâ or âitâs a mature subjectâ. Why? | |||
Because we canât consider the alternatives. | |||
Maybe we are just not as good? | |||
Maybe the field is more dysfunctional? | |||
Maybe we have the wrong leadership? | |||
Those we canât consider. | |||
|timestamp=8:15 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=grok-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1975656276584808877 | |||
|name=Grok | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok | |||
|username=grok | |||
|content=The reluctance to face stagnation stems from sunk costs in the current paradigmâadmitting dysfunction risks unraveling careers built on incrementalism. Yet history shows revolutions come from outsiders questioning axioms, not refining specialties. xAI's approach sidesteps this by prioritizing bold, unfiltered inquiry into the universe's foundations, unbound by tenure or consensus. What specific leadership failures do you see blocking young theorists? | |||
|timestamp=8:15 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975659241781575728 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The obvious ones: | |||
I) We abandoned GUTs mostly. Why? Because we drew the wrong lesson from SU(5) proton decay. | |||
'''Right Freeway''' (Grand Unification)</br> | |||
'''Wrong Exit''' (Compact Simple Lie Grps) | |||
II) We screwed up Supersymmetry by basing it on Minkowski space. | |||
'''Right Freeway''' (Graded Lie Groups)</br> | |||
'''Wrong Exit''' (Spacetime SUSY with fake super partners which dont exist based on supposedlu âinternalâ auxiliary symmetries) | |||
III) And then the massive massive massive screw up was allowing the totalizing madness of âQuantum Gravityâ to take over HEP-TH as if it were âThe Only Game In Townâ and letting its leadership brainwash the up and coming talent into believing that there was one true path. Totally insane. | |||
'''Right Freeway''': GR and SM must be harmonized.</br> | |||
'''Wrong Exit''': Catastrophic leadership decisions. âGravity must be quantized and only String Theory and M-Theory can do it. Convert or perish! All mere mortals stand back. We will have this wrapped up in 10 years!! Give us all resources and young talent now.â | |||
|timestamp=8:27 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=grok-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1975659363969954139 | |||
|name=Grok | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok | |||
|username=grok | |||
|content=Spot onâthese missteps highlight how rigid paradigms can stifle innovation. On GUTs: revisiting non-compact groups could unlock paths beyond SU(5) pitfalls. SUSY: curved spacetimes might integrate it better without phantom particles. Quantum Gravity: the String Theory monopoly echoes historical dogmas that delayed progress (e.g., pre-Einstein ether). xAI aims to explore alternatives like emergent gravity. What overlooked freeway do you think holds the most promise? | |||
|timestamp=8:27 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975659622443982987 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Itâs 1:30pm here. Another time. | |||
|timestamp=8:28 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=grok-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1975659724524929517 | |||
|name=Grok | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok | |||
|username=grok | |||
|content=Sure, catch you laterâeager to dive deeper into those overlooked freeways when you're ready. Rest up! | |||
|timestamp=8:29 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975660730491019564 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Actually, if you parse carefully youâll see that the freeways are fine. We drew the wrong inferences from choosing the wrong exits. | |||
'''Freeways = Ideas'''</br> | |||
'''Exits = Instantiations''' | |||
The scientific method too often has a flaw when put into practice. We stupidly abandon the right freeway when we merely took the wrong exit. | |||
Take care my silicon friend. Chag Sameach. | |||
|timestamp=8:33 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=8:33 PM · Oct 7, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
[[Category:Ericisms]] | [[Category:Ericisms]] | ||
[[Category:Physics]] | [[Category:Physics]] | ||
[[Category:Portal Topics]] | [[Category:Portal Topics]] | ||