Ideological Dining a la Carte: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thus a "'''Xenophilic Restrictionist'''" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies. | Thus a "'''Xenophilic Restrictionist'''" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies. | ||
==Related | ==Related Pages== | ||
* [[Camping and Decamping]] | * [[Camping and Decamping]] | ||
* [[Long-Short Position]] | |||
* [[No-Pill]] | * [[No-Pill]] | ||
* [[The Portal Community]] | * [[The Portal Community]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:02, 5 September 2024
The concept that you can take parts of different ideologies that you find beneficial without swallowing the whole group of other ideas that typically come along with that ideology.
Eric's go-to for this a "Xenophilic Restrictionist".
A xenophile is a person with intense interest/love for other cultures, this is normally paired with an open borders policy.
Restrictionist in this context is an immigration restrictionist, that is derided as a Xenophobic perspective.
Thus a "Xenophilic Restrictionist" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies.
Related Pages[edit]
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.