Neo-Debunker: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Ā |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=The heart of my war on | |content=The heart of my war on ā[[Neo-Debunker|Neo-Debunkers]]ā. Ā | ||
Old debunkers confined themselves to conmen and bunko artists. | Old debunkers confined themselves to conmen and bunko artists. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 5 March 2026
The heart of my war on āNeo-Debunkersā.
Old debunkers confined themselves to conmen and bunko artists.
The Neo debunkers donāt hesitate to go against *targets* of covert NatSec bunk & disinformation campaigns.
A real debunker *HAS* to go against NatSec bunk & disinformation.
I think you are avoiding the reality that at a minimum, our government(s) is/are almost certainly faking a UFO/NHI presence from time to time. That we have UFO/NHI SAPs that we deny. That UFO/NHI is used as cover for aerospace at a minimum. That we do harm to our own people by pretending that everything has a prosaic explanation.
And that you are not debunking the govt bunk (at a minimum).
My issue is treating our own people like garbage. I despise gaslighting our own people. And the energy you bring is that we donāt need to go to that layer.
Again: Iām the only guy in UFO space who has seen nothing conclusive about NHI. Iām with you on that.
But I do think there was a secret serious physics research program that was affiliated with this UFO anti-gravity stuff. I think Roger Babson and Agnew Bahnson were likely CIA or IC cutouts. I think this is all bound up in the āGolden Age of General Relativityā.
And I wish you would stop pretending itās all innocent mistakes, coincidences, people making silly claims. A lot of it is. Sure.
But after you strip that off, a lot of whatās left is toxic NatSec gaslighting. And if you canāt face that Iād prefer you stop. Because you then hurt the people who got gaslit.
