Sources and Methods: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{stub}} {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367858910435024901 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein |username=EricRWeinstein |content=Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & donât ever call @Twitte...") Â |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
|timestamp=10:54 PM · Dec 1, 2021 | |timestamp=10:54 PM · Dec 1, 2021 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Related Pages == | |||
* [[Jeffrey Epstein]] | |||
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | |||
* [[Digital Wetwork]] | |||
* [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)]] | |||
* [[Seberging]] | |||
* [[Universal Institutional Betrayal]] | |||
Revision as of 05:45, 12 October 2025
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.
What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile & trafficker.
Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a âBlue on Blueâ screw up?
Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?
Q: Do our sources and methods permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?
Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn & @npr conspicuously will not?
Q: Do you have the financial records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs supposed âhedge fundâ offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund?
Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? đ
Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & donât ever call @TwitterSafety âSafetyâ again.
So this just appears now!?! And what do we learn? That if "Sources and Methods" of the Intelligence Community might be compromised, prosecutors regularly decline to push for full prosecution EVEN IN THE CASE OF SEXUAL ABUSE of minors and INFANTS.
Bingo: Follow the Silence.
We have an undisclosed program; there's some kind of 'understanding' that we don't understand. I very well understand why we don't casually compromise "Sources & Methods". But trafficking kids is NOT casual business. Nor is USING them as part of 'Sources & Methods' for kompromat.
One question now creates 2 teams:
Team A) 'Sources & Methods' are above child trafficking in importance.
Team B) Child Trafficking is above any exemption for our 'Sources & Methods'.
I believe that if Epstein needed to use kids for S&M as Kompromat, we lost our plot entirely.
Seriously, I am not being naive here. If we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we don't have the right to a nation? If our intelligence community is so pathetic...look you get the idea. If the US isn't protecting kids from our own IC, we aren't the US.
I understand we may occassionally have to fell a monster overseas. I understand that sometimes there's a ticking time bomb and 'extraordinary methods' are needed. I understand that we must surveil people or engage in illegal acts while undercover.
But you-can't-use-kids. Period.
Is there some GIANT understanding involving our journalists & news desks that when the IC says 'Sources & Methods' we all just say 'Ok. Anything you say boys.' Like, for example with @arobach being shut down on Epstein: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vjwf9F_v5cI&ab_channel=FoxNews
Abuse of Kids > Sources & Methods
Notice how everything adds up if there's a giant understanding that Sources & Methods trump everything protecting innocent children? You just say 'Sources & Methods are at risk'. Explains Acosta, Robach, Veritas, etc. Boom: No more Epstein mysteries. It's all 'Sources & Methods'.
Q: Why no discussion of Villard House records? A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why no investigation of Epstein's Hedge Fund's trading partners & brokerage? A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why do editors claim no one cares about Epstein? A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Project Veritas? A: S&M.
Q: Why report Epstein was a disgraced Financier when no one seems to have traded with him? A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why so little interest in covering Ghislaine relative to Kyle Rittenhouse? A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why did no one ask where GM last crossed a border? A: S & M.
Moral: Our kids cant vote. We bring them into the world totally dependent on us. If we have a country that deserves an Intelligence Service, we have a right to know that kids are 100% OFF LIMITS as regards 'Sources & Methods' by the IC of us or our allies. Period. Kids >>> S & M.
P.S. And...I appear to be back to being throttled more agressively after several threads were throttled less agressively or not at all by twitter.
At least at first on this thread. We will see whether that continues. CC'ing @lexfridman @benshapiro @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg @bariweiss @BretWeinstein @joerogan @esaagar