Redistribution of Empathy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1965129628399607947}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1965104944325050420}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1849136194820731308}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1849136194820731308}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1849142607919935955}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1849142607919935955}} | ||
| Line 82: | Line 84: | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1283098876660989952}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1283098876660989952}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1027226395095654400}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1027226395095654400}} | ||
== Related Pages == | |||
* [[Degraded State]] | |||
[[Category:Concepts]] | |||
[[Category:Ericisms]] | |||
== Related Pages == | == Related Pages == | ||
Revision as of 04:32, 9 September 2025
Eric Weinstein argues that empathy, a crucial social and moral tool, is being misused or "redistributed" in ways that distort and erode justice, rational discourse, and the ability to make real societal progress. He sees this as part of a larger cultural and ideological trend where empathy is redirected toward individuals who commit harm or who claim victimhood for ideological purposes, often at the expense of actual victims or those who are genuinely suffering. This redistribution creates a competitive atmosphere in which individuals and groups vie for moral superiority by demonstrating excessive empathy toward those who are responsible for harm or criminality, thereby overshadowing the legitimate needs and suffering of the actual victims.
Eric's core concern is not with empathy itself but with how it is redistributed, misused, and manipulated. True empathy, in his view, should be thoughtful, broad, and informed by a sense of responsibility, not a tool for social signaling or a weapon of ideological coercion.
On X
European lives donāt.
Straight lives donāt.
Christian lives donāt.
Conservative lives donāt.
Israeli lives donāt.
Cis-gendered lives donāt.
Ahmadi lives donāt.
Police lives donāt.
Wealthy lives donāt.
Etc. Etc.
This isnāt empathy.
Itās redistribution of empathy.
People die because of what Twitter, Facebook and Google do when censoring truth. So we arenāt going to stop. Even if itās futile.
@jack is a brilliant interesting soul. One of these days heās going to wake up like @ggreenwald, @mattyglesias and others who realized their errors.
Thatās not a dig at @jack, @ggreenwald or @mattyglesias. There seems to be some dreamworld where you think āAbolish the police isnāt really a thing.ā or āThey donāt really mean no justice no peace.ā In the dream You think TheLancet is objective. That Peer Review is pro-science.
In the dreamworld you think revolutionary thinking is a pro empathy movement rather than a redistribution of empathy away from others. You imagine excesses are confined to college campuses and that people grow out of it when they get mortgages. That progressives want progress.
Inside the dream, anti-racism is anti racist rather than a form of racism. Antifa is simply against fascism. Black Lives Matter is about nothing more than Black Lives Mattering.
Sooner or later everyone wakes up. I donāt give up on any friends. And we need our top folks to wake.
I donāt like to block people I disagree with. But here are common reasons i block:
A) Personal attacks.
B) Deliberate misportrayal
C) Misuse of ridicule
D) Trying to get to @joerogan.
E) I canāt afford to get the person therapy.
F) Desire to spar from an anonymous account.
G) The account is trying to drag me towards reputational quicksand.
H) The account is focused on āpick a sideā level analysis
I) Repeated appeals to authorities.
J) Use of invariant phrases (e.g. āIām going to invite you to sit in your own discomfortā) associated with cults.
K) Someone pretends to be pro empathy when they are trying to redistribute empathy away from some people in pain.
L) I could program an Eliza program to deliver the level of challenge.
M) The account makes arguments where Refutation requires divulging personal details.
Etc...
The basic point is this: if youāre absolutely determined to get blocked there are many ways to do it, but It wonāt happen lightly or by accident. And if that means that you have triumphed in your own mind, I feel sad for who you could have become.
But Iāll now gift you your win.
